dark light

XB-70

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News #2107338
    XB-70
    Participant

    Update on Gripen-E development. They will be using more flight aircraft.

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/saab-ready-to-step-up-tempo-of-gripen-e-testing-456945/

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2107352
    XB-70
    Participant

    Absurd…………China is developing the WS-13 for the J-31 and last I heard it was progressing well.

    But it doesn’t offer stealth. And, given that China is experiencing some hiccups with the Ws-15 – the real engine for their intended stealth platform – they are tied down on that and don’t have the resources to undertake a major retrofit of the Ws-13 design. So that leaves the FC-31 with a great vulnerability/weakness from the rear which will not be mitigated for the foreseeable future.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2107357
    XB-70
    Participant

    As far as evaluating the aircraft Post “Syria”, which systems would you evaluate?

    I wasn’t so much speaking of systems evaluation as evaluating the platforms themselves in concert with other combat platforms in simulated future battlespaces. What I was saying was that we have a better idea of what a future battlespace with a near peer power will be like. We’ve now got the chance to work in near vicinity to advanced A2AD systems like S-400 and we’ve now been experimenting with combined 5th and 4th gen platforms in training simulations for a while (and the Russians and Chinese will be doing it now as well). So, this helps the USAF to evaluate it with that forward picture in mind. In order for the F-15X to make sense it has to be able to successfully/reliably accomplish roles/tasks against near peers on the future battlespace over the next 25 years. It doesn’t have stealth, so it can’t do everything, but if it can just do that much then it has potential.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2107368
    XB-70
    Participant

    So, I see it’s prospects as very “grim”

    [USER=”1416″]Scooter[/USER] – I see. Yet the FC-31 doesn’t have a suitable engine. And, as far as anyone here knows, there is not one in development! So, considering the time involved in producing one, what are the FC-31’s prospects if not “grim?” It’s a dead end. The design was likely a useful technology demonstrator, and it may find some future export potential as a cheap fighter (assuming the Chinese can figure out how to make it cheap). But by the time an engine will come along which would allow the design to grow into an all aspect stealth aircraft it will be borderline obsolete.

    There are only two viable foreign stealth fighter designs on a short time horizon. J-20 and Su-57.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2107546
    XB-70
    Participant
    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2107547
    XB-70
    Participant

    [USER=”4698″]bring_it_on[/USER] – I’ll take your word for it. I really don’t know how involved the USAF gets involved with the purchases of partner nations. I still am going to try to find out as much as I can on how they did at Red Flag though. Any initial evaluation was done in the late 00s early 10s. After Syria and such, we know a lot more on how to model a future battlespace.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2107550
    XB-70
    Participant

    Now things are different. Fighters have a lot of expensive systems on board. Radars, antennas, ECM, EOS, whatever. It all needs power, it all needs cooling (space), it all needs maintenance.

    That’s the key right there. No way would the Su-57 be able to drive all of its radar and EW arrays and DIRCMs with just a single engine. The shifts in systems costs is true, but it is the need for electrical power which is the big driver. And future designs will only need more and more electrical power.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2108061
    XB-70
    Participant

    https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2019-03-22/saudi-red-flag-involvement-gives-usaf-glimpse-advanced-eagle

    A pretty nice summary of the improvements made in the F-15 line and how SA’s F-15’s in Red Flag might provide a nice assessment on how a F-15X would fair under modern battlespace conditions. I’m not sold on the F-15X (an ordinance trucker), but if the F-15SA does well then maybe.

    XB-70
    Participant

    So it’s official that the Tejas thread is gone permanently? I believe both of the other threads were restored so I thought the Tejas one would soon be also.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2108443
    XB-70
    Participant

    [USER=”1416″]Scooter[/USER] – If you had some news that said the deal was equal to 1% of Egypt’s nominal GDP and they were paying cash up front then you would be on to something…

    in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2108453
    XB-70
    Participant
    in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2108465
    XB-70
    Participant

    Russian Mi-28 attack helicopters to receive missile with extended range.

    http://tass.com/defense/1049469

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2108467
    XB-70
    Participant

    DOD orders second stealth aerial target drone to be built to simulate stealthy Russian and Chinese designs.

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pentagon-orders-second-stealth-target-drone-to-be-bu-456793/

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2108469
    XB-70
    Participant

    Surely, Egypt doesn’t have that kind of money.

    [USER=”1416″]Scooter[/USER] – News page, man! Post news or at least meaningful commentary. Drivel like the above just shows that you didn’t even bother to read (or understand) the article. A deal worth less than 1% of Egypt’s nominal GDP isn’t very hard to do…especially if they finance over several years.

    [USER=”20563″]haavarla[/USER] – I think the Su-35 is probably the better fit for them. They already have a very good fighter in the Rafale. The Mig-35 wouldn’t get them much. The Su-35, with its hefty range, does though.

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1783069
    XB-70
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 331 total)