weel….as i read it…they wont be flying the with VF units…..the plan was to keep 2 to 4 tomcats per carrier air wing for some special mission role….i`ll try to look it up, and post the link here….
but yes…the F-14 VF units will go this year
last i check…..besides F-14D, the rest of the fleet will be pulled from service by 2008….F-14D are currently planed to be kept in service till 2015……
but believe me…if i get enough money, i`d sure as hell love to keep to birds flying…breaks my heart to see them go
arrite….thanks 🙂
hey Asad ! kee haal tussi ?:)
me fit…tussi daso :p :diablo:
Sounds promising, if they could perfect unmanned aerial refuelling they’d have near limitless loiter capability in addition to the ability to strike nearly any given point in the planet without crew endurance becoming a factor, a very useful trick to have up your sleeve.
as far as i know….autopilot does perform air to air refueling and on the Hornets auto carrier landing as well….so that really isnt the problem…..the problem is make the drone smart…..
There are three related radar technologies that have confusing names.
Phased Array Antenna means the shaping or focussing of the beam is done by feeding an array of emitters with a single high power feed at appropriate phase relationship. Here the phase relationship is fixed, so the beam points at a fixed direction with respect to the array. The beam is scanned by mecahnically moving the whole array
Electronically Scanned Array means the phase relationship is electronically varied to scan the beam without physically moving the antenna array.
Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA / PFAR in Russian) is the phase is changed passively using phase shifters and switches. Typically a single high power source is used which is passed through the phase shifters and fed to the antenna array.
There are two types of Active Electronically Scanned Array (AFAIK). One type is similar to PESA, but there are amplifiers in the individual antenna modules, so the phase shifting can be done at low power, resulting in better efficiency. AFAIK, the russian systems in development follow this route. I would be glad to be proven wrong there 🙂
The other AESA have individual modules generating its own signal. This system has a number of advantages over the others, including high efficiency and high agility of the beam. On the other hand this system arguably have lower S/N ratio.
S/N ratio :confused: ……can you explain that please….i got the rest of the reply though…thanks 🙂