You can use photobucket or similar,this also means you can post bigger photos 😀
Very nice photos btw
Thanks bazv, I do use photobucket, but they seem to take ever-and-a-day to load up!
Yes, There was a dual control version.
John
You mean like this one! Inscribed ‘those are my mates standing by it’.
Probably 38 Sqn. RAF Marham 1937?
RAF10 with ‘Hutchinson Henlows’ enscribed is possibly White Avro Cadet 640 G-ACPB, used by the Cobham Circus in 1934 with two others of the mark painted red and blue. The name could refer to a Mr Hutchinson who was Cobhams chief engineer of that year.
Richard
Thanks Richard – that’s an amazing piece of detective work from such a small well-thumbed print!
G-ACPB
http://www.nvva.nl/renekrul/catalogs/avro.640.cadet.g-acpb.jpg
http://www.sywellaerodrome.co.uk/gallery/large/sywellaerodrome1398.jpg
Great links! To my inexperienced eye they appear to be the same aircraft.
Re the F Sheds, I must stress that in the Wallace pic I’m reffering to the hangar on the left, unsure on type in foreground on right,looks like a C but it isn’t!
You do find variations in F Shed finishes, as some of these hangars were relocated.
As I say Cranwell definately had them, but not heard of them at Manston.
Thanks! We seem to be talking about the same hangar – I was referring to the vertical flying buttress directly over the prop on the 3rd Wallace from the right in photo RAF03.JPG, compared to the similar one at Manston. Bye the way this same designed buttress/truss is visible by its shadow (3rd bay from left) in photo RAF15.JPG. As you say – possibly a relocated hangar with improved buttresses.
I hope my son will take over my collection. I would rather see him sell things than give to a museum. I have given to museums in the past only for the items to disapear. I also have seen archivist’s get rid of things they dont like and when museum policies change due to new management. I have found its better to sell, at least the person who pays money for the item should look after it. I never use to think this way but have learnt a few things over the last 15 years.
Dave
My sentiments precisely. I have first hand experience of a museum mysteriously losing historic photographs, which I had visited previously to view and arrange for prints to be taken. I Went to pick the prints up – which turned out to be of an atrocious jpeg quality – they were embarassed by their quality of printing they could undertake, so I offered to photograph them with my camera whilst I was there and print them myself later at home – they went to get the originals out of the files, but the best and most interesting ones had mysteriously disappeared. To date they still have not been found and in my opinion never will!
My late father had the right idea (he could be ruthless) – split your possessions into two (1) Your personal and most treasured family related photographs, documents and items which you keep and (2) All other non-personal items such as books, trade literature, other documents and items, which you should sell whilst you are still able (he did, and that included a lot of rare aircraft, airframe instruments and manuals – I even remember him selling an early RFC wooden propeller). Now the secret is in the timing – if you sell before you pop your clogs, then you’ve got a bit of spare money to enjoy, but make certain that you don’t leave it too late or you’ll be too infirm even to enjoy that, and HMRC will be laughing all the way to the bank.
Now the bright ones amongst you will say ‘what if I drop down dead tomorrow’ – well don’t worry, someone will sort your mess out! Either your family if you have some, or the house clearance boys if you don’t, but please leave a note to your family to be discrete about the disposal if you have high value items, as HMRC will be lurking and waiting for his cut!;)
Now just an additional word for those of you who possess those lovely old photos – please – please have them annotated lightly on the back or in the album to identify who or what it is, and when and where it was taken. It is a distressing sight to see so many lovely old family photo albums which were treasured by their owners to be lost forever, hidden away in auction sale-room boxes with no marks at all to identify the family or photos. Some of you may disagree, but even certain Ebay sellers respect family and genealogical interest.
Have a great day!
The a/c behind the reclining “erk” is a Hawker Hind T. Yes “my mates “are standing in front of a Hendon
John
Thanks John.
A few more photos.
RAF19.JPG Another complete mystery. This aircraft appears to have just been set back on its feet by the look of the mud on the prop hub and broken blade tips – any suggestions as to the aircraft and likely airfield appreciated.
RAF20.JPG – RAF23.JPG I believe this Hawker Audax K7385 must be accident prone. These shots are obviously not of its final demise at Peterborough 11.01.40, as TB, seen in RAF21.JPG and taking it easy on the left in RAF22.JPG was at 4 Wing Hednesford 13 Oct 1939 before getting his sea legs at Stn. Gosport on 13 Mar 1940. Probably RAF Marham – any suggestions?
i take it its a crash recovered engine as it looks like its had one hell of a hit
Sorry but I just had to smile at this one!
I was going through the 1944 Rolls-Royce Instructors’ Course Notes for their Merlin series engines, to see if I could find any useful info. for poor old retrowalter’s engine and I came across this sheet headed:
CHECKING DISTORTION OF CRANKCASE AND REDUCTION GEAR AFTER SHOCK LOADING
Item (9) Check neck of crankcase and engine bearers for cracks or damage.😀
Found the info. I was looking for. This is my late father’s notes for identifying the various Merlin engines. It may not be too helpful in view of the amount of missing parts on the engine, but you should be able to see at a glance from the route chart, which series you can eliminate and which to consider. I see you’ve already identified it as two-piece cylinder block, single-stage, two-speed.
So you’re looking at the series shown in diag. top right listed under ‘X’ which is also in column ‘B’ of the bottom diag. Hope you can read it and see the colours ok!
Best of luck!
That was Rocketeer throwing a spanner in the works! It has single piece blocks and a single-speed single-stage blower. The key with the photos is the design of the blower casing which was introduced in 1940 as the Merlin 45 ruling out any earlier versions.
The chart is interesting in showing how diverse the Merlin variants were.Pete
Thanks Pete – the engine is far too modern for this chart!:D
No19 is a Hawker Fury. The Audax looks to be used for solo flying as there is no gun ring fitted and it has the ballast weights fitted. It was with 7FTS. 7FTS at Peterborough also had some Furies.
John
Thanks John – that ties in well with other info. since found!
Just some observations:
Appears to be a glaring discrepancy between the stamped date at top right which looks more like 9 SEP 1946, the date of the incident and the date the seller states the form is of 1939, or am I missing something here?
Perhaps you should ask the seller to explain this discrepancy!
The first thing that struck me is how well the typing looks ie. has survived, apart from the grammar which could prove difficult through trying to interpret what a polish (with a small ‘p’) pilot, perhaps with poor English was trying to tell you!
……………First, many (if not most) of the original items being sold were amongst those stolen many years ago from Kew…………
Do you know if there were any wads of blank report forms stolen at that time… similar to the theft of blank M.O.T. certificates from garages which subsequently lead to a spate of false certificates in the motor trade? On second thoughts, I suppose they wouldn’t have to be stolen, knowing the AM bureaucracy there must have been thousands of blank forms kicking around which ended up in the auction house sale-rooms. There are just a couple of other thoughts to ponder: How come any Combat Report has been separated from the others and put up for sale, are they not public records and should be returned as such? Also why hasn’t Kew publicly listed the stolen/missing reports, or haven’t they in turn been keeping a proper inventory?
Sadly to conserve the rapidly diminishing ‘Attachment Memory’ in my account I’m unable to post pictures of all of NAM’s ‘engine test-bed’ airframes however I would note the following………………………………………………………Footnote to Mods how do I proceed when the attachment quota is reached?
I have the same problem – so interested in the reply from Mods!
I’m having to delete previously posted attachments to free up space for further posts and attachments. I do this on the premise that there appears to be rapid feedback on this forum, so the info. has already been disseminated to the most interested parties and feedback received within at least the first 48 hours.
Others on the forum have suggested loading images etc to Photobucket, but I find that method too slow and user unfriendly!
…………To a military historian years later……………………………… can of worms…………
:diablo:
Heehee … too late.. already spotted!
You were spot on though, not only with these reports but for much larger parts of military history. The older and hopefully wiser I become, the more despondent I am when viewing/reading so called reports and documentaries. Inaccuracies so far seen relate not just to forum based information, but unfortunately extends to official information. I have for instance, original documentary evidence which proves an official squadron history is incorrect. My late father also had errors and omissions on both his RAF Service & Release Book (which he managed to have corrected and re-signed some 6 years after the war) and also (conveniently), omissions from his Service Record Form 543, centered around numerous FAA secondment postings from HMS Condor and HMS Daedalus which he was unsuccessful in having included. In his own words in a more recent letter “… After six months correspondence mainly with HMS. Centurion, at Gosport I have almost come to believe that my presence is just a recurrent bad dream!……….” The old saying ‘you cannot rewrite history’ is correct, as once written even incorrectly, it cannot be changed, it’s like a cancer, others feed off it to write even more tosh!
Regards
ps. So that was you on duty at Wattisham that night back in the mid 1970’s when the Tower wouldn’t change the lights to let me back across, from halfway down the active runway. I was stranded for over an hour late at night waiting to get back after giving a survival & map reading lecture in the ATC hut at the far side of the airfield. I bet you all sat there waiting for me to jump the lights!:D