dark light

Eric Mc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 543 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gemini Spacecraft #1356064
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    It wasn’t that the American engineers and designers were unaware of the fire hazard. If weight had not been such a crucial issue when designing the Mercury capsule, they would not have gone withb pure oxygen design. As I mentioned aerlier, the original Apollo Command Module was being designed even before Mercury had flown, so pure oxygen was retained as a basic requirement for Apollo as well- again to save weight.

    By 1967, the technicians had become so used to dealing with pure oxygen that they had grown casual and blase about the risk and minimised the hazard in their own minds, On January 27 1967, they paid the price for that lax atitude.

    in reply to: Gemini Spacecraft #1357511
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    It was in that context that he was making those comments. I wonder what the astronauts’ opinion was when it was announced in 1972 that the same company (now Rockwell of course) got the contract for the Shuttle Orbiter?

    What a lot of people often don’t realse is that NA were actually building two very different kinds of Command Modules in the mid 1960s, called Block 1 and Block 2 respectively. The Block 1 design dated back to 1959/60 when the successor to Mercury was being formulated. It did not have any EVA or docking capabilities as these requirements were not envisaged at that time. Once JFK announced that America was going to the moon and Apollo was going to be the vehicle to get there, NA had to totally redesign the Command Module to allow docking and EVA. To save time, they cointinued with the original concept – the plan being that the early Apollo flights, which would not carry a Lunar Module, could go ahead more quickly if the earlier spaceship was used. Apollo 1 would have used a Block 1 Command Module.

    After the fire, the whole idea of using Block 1 spacecraft was dropped and no Block1 ever carried men into space.

    in reply to: Gemini Spacecraft #1357872
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    No you didn’t – but the thread title is about Gemini capsules – and not everyone here may be up to speed on who flew what spaceships. 🙂

    Since we have deviated onto other US space programmes, I am currently reading Gene Cernan’s autobiography. He explains early on in the book how unhappy the astronaut corps were with North American who built the Apollo Command Module. They MUCH preferred dealing with McDonnell, who had built the Mercury and Gemini capsules. The astronauts felt that the NA people were far too arrogant and unwilling to take on board the astronauts’ suggestions – unlike McD who were far more receptive and co-operative.

    in reply to: Gemini Spacecraft #1358309
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Which is a Mercury capsule, of course.

    in reply to: Hundred days that Shook the World #1358881
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Digging back into a 35 year old memory, I seem to remember that it was an odd combination of fact and fiction punctuated with colour paintings similar to the one you see on the cover. The narrative alternated between an historical account of the battle and a ficticious story.

    in reply to: Gemini Spacecraft #1359011
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Good guess by me then 🙂

    I’ve always been a fan of the Gemini programme. It kind of gets forgotten because it came between Mercury and Apollo and yet they carried out some dramatic and important tasks during those flights. The photos and film taken on the Gemini missions are some of the most spectacular manned spaceflight images ever.

    in reply to: CL-44 skymonster @Bournemouth – status? #1359283
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    RUPERT Keegan was the son of Mike Keegan (of BAF fame) and was a handy racing driver. He did well in the UK based Aurora F1 series in 1978/79.
    I wonder is it him they are referring to.

    in reply to: Gemini Spacecraft #1359286
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Is it full size or a boiler plate I wonder? I’ve seen photos of a black and white dummy Gemini capsule being towed aloft behind a DC-3 and I’m pretty sure it had a fixed wheeled undercarriage.

    The big question is, how did this device end up in the UK?

    in reply to: Hundred days that Shook the World #1359290
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I used to draw it out of my local library around 1970 so 1969 sounds correct. It was cashing in on the Battle of Britain movie a bit I think.

    in reply to: Roy Cross #1359992
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Although I didn’t see the programme, I had heard about this particular element of the show. Methinks they were trying to be a mite controversial.

    It is true that about 25 years ago, Airfix did sanitise a lot of their box art. Partly this was to do with being a bit more careful about what they were depicting but there was also a general tightening up of what could be displayed from an “accuracy of depiction of contents” point of view. By 1981/82, Airfix and most other kit manufacturers had got rid of their box art completely and were showing less than inspirational photos of made up models on the box lids.

    The good news is that for the past ten years, Airfix have gradually reintroduced a lot of the original artwork and commissioned a lot of new stuff as well. You might be pleased to know that their current boxing of the 1/72 scale Lancaster shows the same picture that adorned the Lanc box back in the 60s i.e. the plane coming in over the black and white chequered hut at the end of the runway with one of its engines streaming flames and smoke. Very dramatic.

    So, May was sort-of correct but really out of date.

    The one genuine PC element of modern kit selling is the lack of Swastikas shown on Luftwaffe kit boxes or included in the enclose decal sheets. Did they mention that?

    in reply to: Time Warp Back to the 1950s #1360274
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Looks more like a Victor to me 🙂

    Is the Dinger Bell you mention the same Dinger Bell who flew Lysanders during the war on clandestine missions to France?

    Nice photos.

    in reply to: Brought Down #1373105
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    There’s an Italian fighter in the background in the Arado picture. Definitely the Mediterranean area.

    in reply to: Moreton-in-Marsh aircraft #1375622
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    It is on the site of an old WW2 airfield. During 1939-45, it was used as a Wellington OTU. Just outside the town, there is a small privatley run but intersting little museum containing bits and pieces of Wellingtons and memorabilia associated with the aircraft and its operations at Moreton.

    in reply to: Fan trainer from the mid eighties #1377122
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    The Fantrainer certainly displayed at the 1986 show.

    in reply to: Moreton-in-Marsh aircraft #1377131
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I didn’t realise that they had so many aircraft on strength. What’s the reg’ of the Viscount?

    If you’re in the vicinity of Moreton, pop into the Wellington museum.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 543 total)