Chuck Yeager wasn’t impressed when he test flew a captured MiG 15 in the 1950s.
“Mismaligned” surely must mean “highly praised”? 🙂
Just done a Google search and the US Navy have one for restoration for their museum at Pensacola.
The problem is that Cunningham, being an ex-US Navy officer, would probably have had very high moral standards for most of his life. It’s the political process which corrupts. I know there are some honourable politicians, but it takes an exceedingly strong minded individual to remain in politics and retain their integrity.
Read that yesterday. It just goes to show that the temptations of office can be very difficlt to resist.
I found the news rather sad and depressing.
Is that really true? Did Britain have enough atomic information available to it in the late 1940s to enable it to develop a fission bomb purely on the data it held alone?
Or had it acquired enough data during the Manhattan Project to allow it to go it alone when (and if) America locked the Brits out?
I am genuinely curious about this as the full story of Britain’s involvement in the US atomic and hydrogen bomb projects is still not well known.
I assume that this is an American series modified slightly for showing in the UK. Many aviation documentaries seem to fall into this category these days. There doesn’t seem to be anyone in the BBC or ITV willing to fund aviation documentaries with a British (or even European) slant.
Since the retirement of people like Raymond Baxter, British TV seems to have lost any interest or enthusiasm for British achievements in science and technology. All we ever get is a constant litany of mistakes, failures and disaster (both actual and financial). Is there a plot out there to destroy our souls?
Well, does it say it all?
It basically says what everyone tends to say, especially in the UK.
The mystery element to all this is to what extent Bell relied on Miles data. NOTHING has ever been published stating categorically that Bell made use of the Miles work. That’s what I would like to see resolved for once and for all.
The other mystery element is the reason given by the UK Air Ministry for the cancellation of the project. I do not really think that safety of the pilot was the real issue. My theory is that pressure was exerted on Britain by Washington to cease work on the project. Britain did not come out of the deal empty handed however. Has anyone ever considered that there might be a link between Britain’s withdrawl from early supersonic research and their apparent sudden acquisition of information on the construction of atomic weapons?
To be honest Flood – I sometimes feel the same way about these British aircraft industry “hard done by” stories. British aviation enthusiasts are sometimes very begrudging to the achievements of the US aircraft industry.
If anyone serves flak over British aviation industry missing out on opportunities it’s British politicians – who consistently dashed the prize out of British manufacurers’ hands just when it was within reach.
Eric Brown is still with us (and appeared in yesterday’s programme). He is a great source for first hand details and has written a few books on these subjects himself.
Essentially what you say is the gist of the story – at least, the version that is common currency here in the UK. All moving tailplanes had been used on aircraft before – after all, the Wright Brother used an all moving plane to control pitch on their Flyers. However, I’m pretty sure Miles were the first to propose using it on an aircraft designed for supersonic flight. What would need to be done is a serch of the Bell archives to dind their drawings of their all-moving tailplane design and see if it predates their visit to Miles – or even whther it bears any relationship to the Miles concept.
Good stuff. What film footage exists of the French aircraft? I’d certainly buy a relevant DVD of British and French projects.
Not often?
Often enough in that we tend to see them to the exclusion of everything else.
It would be nice to see more stuff on the British research aircraft of the period of which there were many (too many, probably) and also the French, who built stuff that made the American and British aircraft look relatively conservative in comparison.
hm – 06 – not a mention, I’m afraid. Only the British efforts that went wrong, particularly the DH-108. The DH-110 accident at Farnborough was also covered at length – although what that incident had to do with air speed records I don’t know.
Exactly my thoughts too. In fact, they hardly mentioned ANY of the official World Air Speed Flights at all – which was rather odd as I thought the programme was about Air Speed Records. Certainly the other two programmes cover the Land and Air Speed Records. The only official air speed record flight mentioned was Teddy Donalsdon’s 1946 606 mph in the Gloster Meteor – and then only in passing. None of the other TRUE air speed records got a look in at all – and that included the American flights as well.
I was expecting to see footage of pre-war Schneider Trophy seaplanes, the Messerschmitt 109R/209, maybe the aborted high -speed Spitfire project, Donalsdon’s Meteor, Lithgow’s Swift, the FD-2, the F-100 Super Sabre, the Hawker Hunter and Douglas Skyray. Even the SR-71 was left out.
Anyone watch this programme last night?