dark light

Eric Mc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 543 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Prewar British Engine Names #1428205
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Is Naiad a mythical nymph?

    It gets confusing with all the mergers that took place in the 50s and 60s. We ended up with oddball nomenclature such as Rolls Royce Olympus and Rolls Royce Proteus.

    in reply to: Scale Spitfire #1428209
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I rest my case M’lud.

    in reply to: Scale Spitfire #1428256
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Conscience?

    in reply to: British WW1 Pilot's without parachute's #1428367
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    The RAF probably started issuing parachutes to aircrew in the early 1920s. There was no Fleet Air Arm at the time. Aircaft flying off Royal Navy ships were flown by RAF aircrew. The Royal Navy only regained control over its naval aviation assets in the 1930s by which times parachutes were standard issue.

    in reply to: Prewar British Engine Names #1428397
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Rolls Royce started calling their aircraft engines after birds of prey with the World War One “Eagle”. We then had the more famous ones – Merlin, Kestrel, Griffon and the not so famous Goshawk, Exe, Peregrine and Vulture. They decided to call their jet engines after British rivers (Derwent, Tay, Trent, Dart, Nene, Tyne, Avon, Conway etc) Then they gave up on the river names and went down the boring “numbers” route – RB162, RB211 etc. More recently, the rivers have been resurrected although rather than find any new river names to use they have decided to recycle some of the old ones (Tay and Trent). Why have they never called an engine after the Thames or Severn I wonder?

    Bristol engines were named from characters and places in Greek and Roman Mythology – Perseus (Greek), Taurus (Roman), Olympus (Greek), Centaurus (Roman), Pegasus (Greek) etc.

    De Havilland seemed to call all their engines “Gypsy” – which was slightly coinfusing.

    Napier were totally random, – Dagger, Sabre, Nomad, Elland.

    Armstrong Siddeley named their engines after big cats – Jaguar, Cheetah,

    in reply to: British WW1 Pilot's without parachute's #1428552
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I think the atitude of the expendability of the combatants had a lot to do with lack of urgency in developing a practical parachute for aircraft. As aircraft became more sophisticated and pilot training became more involved – and expensive, the economics of throwing a good pilot away as well as a good aeroplane just didn’t make sense.

    in reply to: Scale Spitfire #1428578
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    “Waste of money” for a start. The same model can be bought a lot cheaper all in one go – according to others on the forum. And of course, you cannot afford to miss an issue – as each issue contains some vital components. One of the complainants on TV last night did miss an issue. They tried ordering the missing part for the Subaru from Di Agostini and they are still waiting after 18 months.

    Why not go out and buy the big 1/24 Airfix Mk 1 Spitfire. Looks fantastic and less likely to end up in pieces.

    in reply to: British WW1 Pilot's without parachute's #1428738
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Early parachutes werte pretty primitive, and heavy. I think the ones used in observation balloons tended to be left on the floor of the basket. When the balloon had to be vacated in a hurry, the occupant merely lifted the parachute in his arms and leaped over the side. This wasn’t practical in the aieroplanes then in use, especially those being used at the beginning of the war. Of course, by about 1917, weight wasn’t such an issue and Irvin (I think) had developed a rip-cord activated chute which could have been used in an aeroplane. However, the precedent had by now been established that aeroplanes didn’t carry ‘chutes and it took until after WW1 for them to become sdtandard in the RAF.

    The German Imperial Air Service started using chutes in 1918 so that was probably the first time that it was really possible to fit them into the standard cockpit of the day.

    in reply to: Scale Spitfire #1429365
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    This has just been featured on BBC TV’s consumer affairs programme, “Watchdog”. Generally, the concensus appears to be that it is a “bad idea”.

    Two years ago they did the same with a Radio Controlled Subaru Imprezza model rally car. Some people are still waiting for missing parts!

    in reply to: Latest Op shop find's #1429587
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Aircraft Aircraft was one of my favourite books from my local library as a kid.

    I’ve managed to pick up the companion books – “Cars Cars” and “Racing Cars Racing Cars” at local charity shops.

    in reply to: Blue Max Pfalz D.III Flies in NZ #1431198
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Not today, I’m afraid. I will have to do a search first in my slide boxes to find the correct set.

    The planes were put on static display at two airshows held at the Powerscourt Estate in 1977 and 1978. As it was not too far from where I lived, my friends and I took local buses (too poor for cars in those days) to the estate for the airshows. The estate was, for a long time, owned by the Slazenger family (of sports wear fame etc) and they operated a private strip in the estate grounds. A number of other Blue Max planes were displayed along with the Pfalz (an SE5A replica and a Caudron if I remember correctly).

    in reply to: Blue Max Pfalz D.III Flies in NZ #1431479
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I have some slides I took of this aeroplane dating from 1978 when it was living at the Powerscourt Estate in Co. Wicklow. Nice to see it alive again.

    in reply to: Confederate Air Force Airsho 1981. #1431648
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Is it still flying?

    I know the A-20 crashed not that long after I saw it.

    in reply to: Confederate Air Force Airsho 1981. #1431681
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    A few more from the 1981 CAF airshow. The last photo is rather sad. Even though it is slightly out of focus I decided to include it. It depicts the scrambling of a US Navy Bell UH-1 following the fatal crash of Sea Fury N11SF. The smoke from the post crash fire can be seen in the background drifting across the picture.

    I have lots more images on slides and prints from my great USA trip of 1981 which I will endeavour to scan into my computer and post to the forum in due course.

    in reply to: Scale Spitfire #1432565
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Without wanting to sound disingenuous, I think if you’re building it for a chap aged 85, I’d be inclined to go out and buy a kit in one go – and then buy him a subscription to Flypast (or even the “other” historic aviation magazine) with the excess you would have spent on the Spitfire Mag.

    At the age of 85, there’s a strong chance that he may not be around to see the finished item if you are buying it over 50 issues (that’s over 4 years!).

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 543 total)