dark light

Eric Mc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 543 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lancaster MKII #1357519
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I wonder would you get many volunteers to fly a Manchester?

    in reply to: Lancaster MKII #1358494
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    The words “snowball” and “hell” spring to mind – unfortunately.

    A far more worthwhile project would be to try and get a Halifax or even Wellington into the air.

    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Was there not some swept wing research already underway in the US BEFORE the captured German data was available?

    in reply to: Could Some one please explain……… #1366764
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Regarding tax allowable donations in the UK, these are, of course possible. However, it is the recipient of the donation who benefits rather than the donor (which is only right, in my opinion).

    First of all, the recipient has to be a Registered Charity. Secondly, the donation has to be paid under either the Gift Aid provisions or a Deed of Covenant. If these conditions are satisfied, then the charity can claim back from the government. 28p for every £1.00 received from the donor.

    One factor which is often forgotten is that a donation has to be just that, a “donation”. In other words, the donor cannot expect to receive anything in return for their payment. If they are allowed soimething in return, such as admission, membership, a booklet (or even a ride in an aeroplane) it won’t be considered a donation and tax relief will be blocked. Many charities appear to have forgotten this and encourage their members to pay their subscriptions or entrance fees under “Gift Aid”. The UK Treasury is currently looking into this as it appears to be an incorrect interpretation of the basic legislation. So far, they have been reluctant to make a fuss on this topic because it is poltically sensitive but they have sent out warnings to a number of charities.

    Finally, if the individual making a Gift Aid or Deed of Covenant donation to a charity pays tax at the UK Higher Rate (40%), they can personally claim back the tax at the higher rate on the donation. To do this they need to make the relevant entry on the UK Self Assessment tax return form.

    in reply to: Dresden. #1366780
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    There’s no harm in commemorating this event. The Dresden Raid has become a symbol of the horrors of total war and therefore, should never be forgotten. Allocation of guilt or blame is another matter and should be avoided at these times. To qoute the old hackneyed phrase, “there was a war on”, a war in which gradual escalation of the use of massive force had rendered such raids morally acceptable and militarilly justifiable to those making the strategiic decisions.

    It was only in the luxury of peace time that the question as to whether such raids should have been carried out began to be asked.

    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Lovely shots.

    Was a dog compulsory in every personnel photo I wonder?

    in reply to: Scrapyard Photos; Any More? #1373473
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    One corner of Lichfield is now the Curburough Sprint Track (for racing cars). I’ve competed in few events there and many of the RAF buildings are still in daily use, although there’s no sign of runways etc.

    in reply to: Kelly's Heroes #1380462
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Very much a film of its time I guess. As a ten your old child at the time I actually thought it was rubbish too. I knew even then that nobody talked like that in the 1940s and that it had a definite “hippy” slant totally out of keeping with the setting. To be honest, I never really believed that WW2 was that funny a subject and most attempts at comedy based on WW2 fall flat (in my opinion) with the notable exception of “Dad’s Army”.

    For the record, I never rated “Where Eagles Dare” much either.

    And Clint was willing to try his hand at anything back in those days. These are his pre “Dirty Harry” days so I guess he hadn’t quite achieved the iconical status he did later. Other examples of his “comedic” work at the time are “Two Mules for Sister Sarah” and the dreadful “Paint Your Wagon”.

    in reply to: 20 years on….. #1384494
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Maybe “was” is a more appropriate word then.

    Although I could give her the benefit of the doubt and assume it’s the makeup she’s using for that particular role.

    in reply to: 20 years on….. #1384698
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I thought the plot was cheesy from the very beginning, but the aerial sequences are just gorgeous (as is Kelly McGillis). Of course, the dogfight with the “Russian” F-5 is based on Cunningham and Driscoll’s dogfight against Colonel Toon in 1972.

    in reply to: Some English Stuff #1388964
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Is the bi-plane a Parnall Peto?

    It was intended to be launched from a submarine.

    The Scimitar flypast looks awfully like Farnborough to me.

    in reply to: Duke of Kent killed in RAF #1434153
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    The aircraft involved was a Short Sunderland and it flew into high ground.
    Don’t know much else.

    in reply to: More Farnborough Gold #1434157
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I wonder what Brazil sees in making all those airliners these days – when Britain can’t seem to make it work.

    As British Aerospace technically doesn’t exist (it changed its name to BAE Systems a number of years ago) I often wonder about their commitment to genuine “aerospace” work.
    I have a general theory that business is not JUST in business to make profit. Although making profits is a fine goal for any business and without them a business will eventually fail, a business still has to have regard for its core activity – why it was set up in the first place. In Britain today, far too many businesses have deviated from the original “business” that got them going in the first place – as a result we have research esttablishments which make more money as land owners, we have brewries that don’t brew beer any more and we have an aviation manufacturer who seem to think that building aeroplanes is an activity they would like to get out of.

    Profit and shareholder returns isn’t everything.

    And to say that a quiet “airshow” (i.e one where there iis hardly anything flying) is better than a good old fashioned “blood and thunder” air display is probably indicative of the loss of passion, heart and soul from the people involved in the British aviation industry today and doesn’t bode well for the future.

    in reply to: Vickers Valiant XD818 #1434169
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    BBC ran a documentary in the 1970s or early 80s about the withdrawl of the RAF from Hendon called “Goodbye London Aerodrome”. It featured film of the Beverley flying in.

    The documentary was narrated by the late Glynn Wursnip.

    in reply to: Worst Airshow #1353165
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Cork 1985.

    The airshow that never was. It was cancelled in the morning of the show due to low cloud/fog. Most people found out as they sat in their cars waiting to park. We went in anyway and all we saw was the Frecci Triclori MB339s neatly lined up on the apron. A few of the booked “acts” gave impromptu displays at Shannon instead!

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 543 total)