dark light

Eric Mc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 543 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 'Bomber Crew', Episode 4, TONIGHT! #1374647
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Max Hastings’ book is called “Bomber Command”. I read it back in 1981.

    in reply to: Biggin Hill 1982 & 83 Video #1380156
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Cor – I’d forgotten all about this.

    I certainly don’t remember being e-mailed about it either.

    Oh well, cross me of the list as it’s getting rather complicated. I taped the ’82 display off BBC at the time but the picture quality was not that great. I’ll just have to dig it out and watch my snowy images of the Ruskin Airlines DC-3 and the T-33 with the stuck undercarriage.

    in reply to: Swiss Dh-115 belly landed yesterday – AOK ! #1380177
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    A return of the rubber deck would have been useful.

    in reply to: Aircraft in lake at Glenda Lough, co Wicklow, Eire #1386695
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Can’t add anything to your query on the aircraft but the lake is actually spelled Glendalough (all one word). It is am Anglicisation of Gleann Da Lach – the Glen of the Two Lakes.

    in reply to: 'BOMBER CREW'- third sortie, TONIGHT! #1386899
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    And James looked none too happy when he wasn’t selected as “prime pilot” for the Lanc. My money was on him to be honest.

    They obviously aren’t going to let the chosen pilot have too much control over the aircraft.

    in reply to: 'BOMBER CREW'- third sortie, TONIGHT! #1387117
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Still interesting – although the archive footage was a bit haphazard – Bostons, Wellingtons, Halifaxes, B-24s, B-17s, Manchesters – all muddled together in scenes supposed to be depicting one raid.

    in reply to: BOMBER CREW PART 2 TONIGHT #1398615
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    And didn’t those Whitley’s look weird as they came in over the hedge for a mass landing – like a gaggle of geese on approach.

    I must dig out that old Whitley kit I’ve got stashed away.

    in reply to: DH91 Albatross Replica #1398791
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I don’t see much point in doing this type of project unless it is a pretty exact replica – i.e wooden construction. Apart from its beautiful looks, the big “thing” about the Albatross was how it was made. A plastic or composite look-a-like would not be the same. And the chances of an exact wooden reproduction being made and allowed to fly would be precisely nil. I would suspect that the DH91 would not get a civilian CofA under modern licence regulations – they had inherent structural design flaws.

    However, I do think that the Albatross was one of the most gorgeous aircraft ever built.

    in reply to: B52 performance #1401312
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    The reason the B-52 had/has 8 engines is because that was what was needed to haul its weight into the air back in 1952. Don’t forget, the smaller B-47 needed 6 engines AND rocket assistance sometimes just to get airborne.

    in reply to: B52 performance #1401501
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I doubt it could maintain height on one engine (1/8 power!!!!!!!!!). Obviously, the various marks of the B-52 had different versions of the Pratt and Whitney turbojet and the H model, of course, uses the TF33 turbofan.

    in reply to: Farnborough museum #1401549
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I keep meaning to pop in as I pass by the museum quite a few times each week. I last visited about 9 months ago so am due a visit. I want to buy the second of the DVDs they are compiling from old RAE test film footage which you can buy direct from the Museum shop.

    in reply to: Flying Beaufort restoration milestone Australia AGAIN!! #1403444
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    What a fantastic project. I would dearly love to see a Beaufort in the air after all these years – they are very much a forgotten aircraft these days. Do you have access to veterans who flew these aircraft or worked on them back in the 1940s.? Obviously, as time progresses, these individuals become more and more scarce.

    in reply to: Aircraft in 80's TV series… #1410874
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Buccaneer – lantern jawed hero flies Bristol Britannia for fictional airline “Redair”. Series axed when the real airline whose Brit they used, Redcoat, wrote off their Britannia in a crash in the US.

    The Brothers – trucking company takes over run down freight airline owned by Kate O’Mara and lush hubby Mike Pratt (Jeff Randall in the original “Randall and Hopkirk Deceased”). He always kept a bottle of whisky in the filing cabinet, I seem to remember. The airline used freighter DC-3s. That might have been the 70s actually.

    in reply to: BOMBER CREW CH4 UK 21-00 TONIGHT #1410879
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    It’s the ubiquitous channel hopper which causes the “I must repeat the basic scenario after every commercial break” syndrome. I find it truly annoying and one of the biggest nuisances when watching documentaries on channels other than the BBC. Imagine how rubbish “The World at War” would be if that appraoch was used 30 years ago. Sir Lawrence Oliver would have walked out!

    in reply to: A packet marked 'Bovingdon Mitchells 23 May 1978' #1411963
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    N94552 and N9115Z staged through Dublin on 9 March 1979 – it says on my plane spotter’s notes!

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 543 total)