Having just seen the original black & white photo in “The Years Flew Past”, I’m impressed.
Is this an “Observer” type book?
I’ve been given some old (1950s and 60s) books from the Observer and related series. They have very little monetary value but are of interest.
Web Pilot’s post was interesting in that it shows how cumbersome radio and recording gear was back in 1944 – it needed two people to operate it and the crew had to take on less fuel to accomodate the extra weight.
No “Ipod” nonsense in those days.
I’ve seen on board film of Mike Hawthorn taking a D-Type Jaguar around Le Mans on a practice session in 1957. The microphone he is using looks like someting from His Master’s Voice ( a plastic horn arrangement) which is bolted to a wooden box which in turn is strapped to his chest by means of a harness. The sound quality is actually quite good, and the film is a hoot, especially as the road is still open to the public and numerous French cyclists are seen taking avoiding action as Mike barrels towards them at 150 mph plus.
I think that the Rolls Royce “Whizzer” woukd have been a good name, but not the Rolls Royce “Chips”.
There was also a comic called “Battle” which no doubt inspired Fairey.
Recording techniques were quite crude back then. Studio recordings were made direct to wax master discs. Recordings in the field were made on wire recorders. The Germans (BASF) had already invented magnetic tape by then but I don’t think they were in a position to supply any to the BBC in the 1939-1945 period – for obvious reasons.
Wouldn’t it have been great if the BBC had been able to make a video recording of Chamberlain’s return from Munich in 1938. If you look carefully at the newsreel film footage, you’ll see a BBC TV camera in place at the foot of the steps of the aircraft. His return was obviously broadcast live on TV.
BBC did not obtain any magnetic video taping facilities until 1957.
I do not think that the BBC would have carried out “live” broadcasts from such missions. What they used to do was supply their correspondents with a wire reel to reel tape recorder into which they carried out a “live” commentary on the scene and then broadcast an edited (and no doubt censored as well) version later on.
Another recording of a similar nature is Wynford Vaughan-Thomas’ crossing of the Rhine in 1944.
Does anyone know if the radio broadcast of the Luftwaffe raid on Dover made during the Battle of Britain was broadcast live? Technically it would have been possible as it would have been broadcast on home soil but may not have been for security and censorship reasons.
Although Viz did get some aviation fame during Gulf War .
There I was thinking that the top execs at Rolls Royce were avid comic readers. To be honest, I always wondered why the Rolls Royce Bunty and Judy were never proceeded with.
As was the GAL Hotspur.
British aircraft and engine builders were obviously comic fans judging by the names they gave their aircraft and engines –
Armstrong Siddeley “Jaguar” (Jag)
Armstrong Siddeley “Tiger”
Hawker “Hurricane”
Napier “Lion”
Vickers “Valiant”
Rolls Royce “Eagle”
Handley Page “Victor”
Luckily, they didn’t appear to read the Dandy or Beano.
Blenheims were used to bomb German invasion barges during the B of B. I’ve heard that Bomber Command lost a similar number of aircrew to Fighter Command in this period of the war.
I wasn’t a million miles out.
To be honest, I’ve read a few of his books so maybe there was something buried in the dim recesses of my memory somewhere that I could just about dredge up.
His book on flying the Luftwaffe stuff at Farnborough is really good.
Spitfire Mk IX
P-51D
Fw-190D
??????????????
Not in any particular order –
Supermarine Spitfire
North American P-51 Mustang
Focke Wulf Fw190
Am I close?
Blimey – I was standing under that Vulcan last week. If only I’d known!
I didn’t take it personally.
I do realise that modern aircraft are much more complicated than those of earlier periods and that collaborations are the main way forward. Hpowever, not all aircraft are tremendously sophisticated and with Britain’s proud history in aerospace you would think that at least one home grown design could see it through to production without the need to find an overseas partner. As I stated earlier, Embraer of Brazil are turning out some decent airliners and have really stolen a march on what we could be doing here.
The fault lies with short sighted government policies going back 50 years and the failure of British financiers to get behind long term aviation projects in this country. The UK aerospace companies also sowed the seeds of their own demise in earlier eras by failing to grasp the fact that a proper commercial outlook was much more imporatnt than just tendering for domestic military contracts or requirements issued by the nationalised airlines. In effect, the only customer the British aircraft manufacturers ever took seriously was the British government. Overseas sales were usually an afterthought.
The difference in the pre-war groupings is that they came about organically through the expansion of the various companies and commercial mergers. The Government forced mergers of 1962 were purely political. Some of the companies who were already in “groups” had to leave those groups and join up with new government appointed partners. A good example of this is the case of the De Havilland DH121 Trident airliner. De Havilland revived an old name (Airco) to stand as the group name for the companies who were going to collaborate in the building of the plane. One of the companies in the Airco group was the Bristol Aeroplane Company. However, Bristol became part of the British Aircraft Corporation whereas De Havilland became part of the Hawker Siddeley Group. As a result, the Airco group had to be disbanded and Bristol had no further involvement in the project (a lucky escape for them – perhaps, as it turned out).