dark light

Eric Mc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 543 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Raciest sounding aircraft #2682817
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    To be fair tough, the surviving 707s, P & W powered E-3s, KC-135 and DC-8s are all turbofan versions of the JT-3 engine and are not quite the same as those old pure turbojets.

    in reply to: Raciest sounding aircraft #2682900
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Shackletons sounded pretty impressive at full throttle.

    Although I never experienced it in real life, I’ve heard the BBC recording of the first take off of the Bristol Brabazon and it sounds very similar to the B-36.

    Old turbojet 707s and DC-8s had a very distinctive howl when taxying.

    As many have said, an F-104 performing a high speed low level pass at an airshow was pretty dramatic sound wise.

    in reply to: Trident 3b G-awzk……saved!!!!!!!!! #664181
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Originally designed by De Havilland as the DH 121 Trident, it was to be built by a consortium called AIRCO. However, the great amalgamations in the British aircraft industry in 1961/62 forced De Havilland into the Hawker Siddeley group. From that point on it was referred to as the Hawker Siddeley HS121 Trident.

    in reply to: Ever Wondered?? #1605739
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    BEA used Northolt as its base until its purpose built facilities were ready at Heathrow.

    in reply to: Ever Wondered?? #1606526
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    It might be fun to do a SABENA early 50s fleet list check to see what they used at the time.

    in reply to: Ever Wondered?? #1606533
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    The words DC-3/Dakota and “Radar” don’t automatically go together. You might have been looking at a SABENA Convair 340/440.

    Certainly sounds like the mid 50s but perhaps post 1955 rather than pre?

    in reply to: War machine or Thing of beauty #1606622
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I have often thought about this issue. How can a weapon designed for death and destruction be also admired as a thing of beauty?. Well, the answer is of course, it can.

    Throughout history, man has made weapons, often to hunt, sometimes to defend, sometimes to attack and also to kill each other. But one can admire the skill and craftmanship that has gone into many of these weapons, whether it is a 50,000 year old flint axe head or whether it is “Enola Gay”.

    Knowing the context in which the weapons were used is usually a factor in whether it is admired or despised. As someone said earlier, a Stuka may be a thing of beauty to a retired Wermacht officer but to a Dunkirk verteran it might be epitomised as the flying equivelant of a Swastika and the evilness that symbol embodied.

    I think admiring man’s handiwork, whether built for good or evil, is not an issue. Knowing the context in which the weapons were or are used, knowing the background history and the way it effected people’s lives and appreciating the technology are the factors which keeps me fascinated in military aircraft.

    I also do my best to ensure that my love for combat aircraft does not cloud my political judgement. Just because I think an A-10A Thunderbolt II is an aweome and impressive piece of kit does not mean that I would support every miltary action it has been involved in.

    in reply to: Messerschmitts!! #1607091
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I never thought about that. I presume it was the back seat man.

    in reply to: Nostalgic pic #668567
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I flew to Houston in 1981 on a BCal DC-10 (and returned on a similar aircraft). They were lovely flights with cheery and helpful staff. We even got a trip to the flight deck on each flight.

    BCal itself was formed when the original Scoittish based airline, Caledonian, merged with British United Airways in 1970.

    in reply to: The Dublin meet… #668572
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    That shot of the approach over the coastline showed Portmanock and its beaches – only about two miles from where I originally come from.

    Did you know that back in the 1930s, some famous aviators (Amy Johnson, Jim Mollison, Ross and Keith Smith) took off on early trans-Atlantic flights from those beaches? Before my time, I hasten to add.

    in reply to: Whats different about this picture #668589
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Aircraft performing a flypast or overshoot/go-around?

    in reply to: What happened to the MD-82? #668639
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    I remember when this happened – although I’d never seen that amazing piece of footage before. It was definitely an accident and I remember wondering at the time whether the MD-80 was a “stretch too far”. At the time of this accident the aeroplane was still referred to as the Douglas DC-9 Series 80/81/82.

    As for the deliberate crash of a “707” – this was actually a time expired Boeing 720. The plane had been in use by the FAA and was in full FAA livery. It was fitted with remote control gear and the main purpose of the crash was to test a new anti-misting fuel. Although there was a massive initial fire at the moment of impact, the fire almost extingusihed itself which seemed to vindicate the effectiveness of the fuel additive. Unfortunately, the idea was never taken beyond this test. The test was conducted in 1983.

    in reply to: Messerschmitts!! #1607203
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    No excuses accepted – they are so small they take about 5 minutes to put together. I’ve made the Airfix one- which is nice and the PM model of the original DFS194 which was the (in modern terminology) the “proof of concept” design.

    in reply to: Messerschmitts!! #1607314
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    With all the talk of Bf-109s and Bf-110s, all the other Messerschmitts are getting hardly a mention.

    What about the 410, one of which resides in the UK and whose engines are run up from time to time? I saw it at St Athan in 1988 but I think it lives at Cosford now.

    Then there are the 163 Komets scattered about the place. I always get shivers when I see those things up close – and hope that there are no dreggs of C-Stoff or T-Stoff sloshing about in the tanks.

    One Messerschmitt I would LOVE to see would be an Me-323 Gigant. Now that WOULD be something to behold.

    in reply to: Ju-87 Stuka #1607496
    Eric Mc
    Participant

    Thank’s for that. I have always wondered what their eventual fate was.

    I spotted a Stuka in a trailer for the BBC’s “Dunkirk” the other night (which I’m taping for later viewing). Are these shots done by CGI?

    In fact, with CGI will we see a resurgance of interest in WW2 epics and maybe re-makes of such films as “The Longest Day” and “A Bridge Too Far”?

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 543 total)