Brian Lecomber also wrote a novel. Was it called “Talk Down”? I seem to remember it was pretty good. Has he written any more?
What the coverage lacked was an anchor who really “felt” for the subject matter and the related history. That’s why folk like Raymond Baxter were so good. They knew when to stay quiet and exactly what note to strike in their reporting.
Also, being knowledgeabe about the topic being covered would have prevented the howling “gaffs” and inaccuracies.
None of those factors are a function of budget – just a function of the type of people who work in the media these days i.e people whose entire professional career is “media” based. Reporters of Baxter’s generation all came to the media having already had careers in more “meaningful” areas – such as flying Spitfires 🙂
Bought the Haqlifax last week. Definitely the Matchbox kit. Great that we can now do both major sub-types of the design.
If only someone was brave enough to give us a Hercules option on the Lancaster.
I certainly remember seeing UO-T at Greenham in 1976 although that was one of the Memorial Flight machines. If you noticed, both the Spitfire and the Hurricane were in glossy paint schemes. Back then, it was condsidered better to use gloss paints as they retained their finish better than the matts available at the time. Even the Lancaster was in gloss.
I think Shuttleworth had their Spitfire flying in 1976 and the Confederates in the US had one as well.
Thank’s for finding that. Very good.
I never knew that the Queen worked as a Public Announcer at the London Air Terminal 🙂 The voice was extremely plummy wasn’t it – but the diction was perfect.
I didn’t spot any Accountants though. That film was made very early in the 50s, almost ten years before the Accountant flew. There was some footage of the Armstrong Whitworth Apollo.
Although Hooker’s work was extremely important, like the Enigma point above, Hooker’s work on the supercharger for the Merlin only came into effect AFTER the Battle of Britain.
Britain did not have superior technology during the Battle of Britain. What it DID have was technology which more or less matched what the Germans had coupled with a well integrated radar based defence system and the huge advantage of operating over home soil.
Technology on its own is never decisive. It’s how the technology is used that makes the difference.
From an aircraft point of view it can be argued that there was virtually nothing to chose between the opposing sides. Bomber wise, the Luftwaffe aircraft were not really up to the job of strategic bombing. Fighter wise, the Bf109 was every bit as good as the Spitfire and better than the Hurricane, but severly hampered by lack of range. The Bf110 proved itself virtually worthless in its intended role.
The British posession of radar was not decisive (the Germans had already independently devised similar technology) but it was the properly intergrated defence system of RAF Fighter Command using radar stations and sector control centres all co-ordinated through Bentley Priory that REALLY was important.
I visited the Bournemouth museum lastb Sunday and G-AGSH is looking gorgeous. She seems to be in fantastic condition.
Where did you get yours from?
Was Gerry Marshall involved?
The true prototype of the low cost scheduled carrier is Southwest Airlines of Texas. They began operating in 1973 (Laker began operations as a regular scheduled airline and charter operator in 1966 – his low cost operations began in 1973 but due to all the restrictions put in place, he wasn’t really able to operate the way he wanted to until 1977).
I think “Daz” washing powder did something similar in the 70s. The models didn’t half pong though.
An impressive career.
I presume Masefield House at Gatwick is called after him?
Is the mystery Fuji 200 mentioned earlier actually a Ryan Navion by any chance?
It was pretty ugly, whatever it was.