Even if it wasn’t a MiG-21 drop tank, it would only prove that a non-Indian drop tank fell to the ground. That does not require that an aircraft accompanied it all the way down.
I don’t think it is the USAF’s job to explain the F-15X if it is something that would have been taken up by the OSD as an industrial base play. Certainly, the health of the industrial base is a major Pentagon responsibility, whether that is a republican controled WH or a Democratic controlled and it was no coincidence that one of the first things the current administration began to look into was the state of the industrial base something that was also on the mind of people like Frank Kendall and Bob Work in the previous administration. But I agree, they should have done a better job explaining why we need two primes as suppliers of fast jets (or potential suppliers) to the USAF and why we cannot drop down to one. I would love to hear their reasons as well.
Well, in fairness, it is perfectly obvious why having one manufacturer monopolize fast jet production and development is potentially very bad thing. This was shown with Pratt & Whitney, same thing happened with space launch service providers. Of course Boeing does have T/X now, which is grand scheme of things is likely more important than handful of F-15’s.
Taiwanese AF denies that the missile wreck found by Indians could have come from Taiwanese batch.
“The Air Force in Taipei said Friday afternoon that after checking the information, it had concluded that the identification numbers shown did not match any of its missiles, and were not compatible with any weapons systems in its possession, the Central News Agency reported.”
Checked Yefim Gordon’s MiG-29 book, it says that chaff cartridges could be carried in countermeasures dispenser, but usually were not.
Thanks
but as far as I know in the 80s the mig-29 9.12 were fitted with chaff dispensers from the start , is that true ?
No idea. I have a MiG-29SD sales brochure from mid-90s, it mentions “passive jamming against heat-seeking missiles”, so it seems that export aircraft at least came only with flares by default.
IIRC, the Indian pilot captured in 1999 said on his return that Pakistanis and Indians share more than they this. I may be mistaken and it could have been the PAF officer who interrogated him said something like this. You give Pakistani establishment more credit than they deserve. In today’s day and age, more people have camera phones than those who don’t. I have seen videos of recent incidents made by locals before army got there. I don’t post such stuff simply because I don’t consider it to be ethical. Do you really think Pakistani army has such control over the locals that they cannot leakage of images from downed F-16 (per Indian media) but controlled everything in a place where 300-500 terrorists were killed. Is Pakistani army so efficient that they cleared the whole thing within 24 hours and BBC reporters only saw craters. I have no doubt you would have a counter argument, but you are adding credence to BRF claims that Pak army has djinn powers (pun intended).
Well, it’s a mountaneous region, it is plausible that a plane would crash in remote area which military would reach much quicker than the locals and cordon the area off. Still, I think there is a notable dearth of evidence of more than 1 plane crashing yesterday – other than the helicopter which interestingly Pakistan did NOT claim. Civilians were aware of the air battle and were filming, if there really were more casualties we should have seen more pics and footage of the flaming wrecks, parachutes etc.
Poses of the men and focus of the photo suggest it’s a major piece of wreckage in the location.But an F-16 (or any other jet) would leave behind much more wreckage.
I dunno, maybe it’s a piece from a drop tank?
Finland chooses ESSM for Squadron2020 corvettes:
[h=1]Surface-to-air missile system for Pohjanmaa-class corvettes[/h]
Wasn’t Malaysia unhappy with high Israeli content in Tejas? FA-50 has nearly as much Israeli stuff.
Supposedly JF-17 Block III will have longer service life.
Paralay suggested this in another thread 2015.
That looks similar to British Aerospace SABA from the eighties:
[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”3.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3852451}[/ATTACH]
It was meant as COIN aircraft with special attention given to shooting down helicopters. SABA used unducted fan though. Regular turbofan was also considered.
Some Polish Scorpion proposals were also turboprops.
If we only stay in the narrow confines of the subsonic visual range aerial combat, then yes, absolutely, it would be possible to design a turboprop fighter with performance good enough to hang with modern jets. Several attempts at turboprop fighters were made in the ’50s, for example XF-84 and Lockheed XFV. Performance they had was equivalent to 1st generation jet fighters like Sabre etc.
We do know that well-flown subsonic jets like A-4, Gnat, MiG-17, Super Etendard were and are credible challengers for modern fighters in a close-in maneuvering fight. So no reason a turboprop fighter developed with modern technology wouldn’t have power loading, acceleration, turning performance etc. required to acquit itself well in WVR regime.
However, operationally, such a fighter would make no sense at all. Dash speed and acceleration provided by afterburner is way too valuable to give up. Even though modern fighters no longer strive for Mach 2.5 or above speeds, nobody is planning to give up supersonic capability in fighter aircraft. Coincidentally this is why nobody bought Harrier as land-based air superiority fighter.
Not to mention obvious challenge of making propellors stealthy.
After Georgia, Crimea, Donbass and military buildup along the borders with Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, Finland would be wise to prepare for Continuation War 2.0.
Yes, there is no chance of returning to Cold War era grovel…appeasement policies. Even most Finnish commies are hardly big fans of the Putin era Russia.
(“Continuation war” is such a dumb translation, it would be more properly called ‘Sequel War’ as that’s what it was in very literal sense. “Winter War 2: Payback Time”.)
I appreciate that the government may be advised that they need to reduce spending but that does not mean savings have to come from the defence budget, does it? All the same I can see that short of postponing air force/naval procurements there might be pressure to focus more closely on the cost of an F-18 replacement.
No it doesn’t, but last two previous governments got through depression by making enormous savings in infrastructure maintenance, education and research (which were slashed by one-THIRD), there is not going to be much left where to save more. At the same time, there is not much chance to postpone Hornet replacement as the airframes barely last through the current projected service life.
2025?
This particular competition seems like a foregone conclusion, unless something spetacularly strange happens, its an F-35A win.
With Russia right next to its door, a decently sized budget, no indigenous product and no particular political problem with any of the five contestants, the Fins are (almost certainly) going to acquire the most advanced option, and with their timeline, any teething problems with “Dave” will be long gone.
Don’t get too excited about ‘decent sized budget’ just yet. Ministry of Finance announced recently that next Government needs to conjure up savings of around six billion euros by 2025. And that is assuming that current economic growth continues. By coincidence, that is almost exact same as current projected cost of HX fighter acquisition, and Finland has contemporary naval building program too competing for funds…
Before the ’80s, very few fighters carried chaff dispensers, much less internal ECM. I believe F-15 had internal jammer from the start, but chaff dispensers were added only later. For the most part, fighter aircraft in both East and West had no protection against radar-guided missiles except their own maneuverability and performance.