It’s lasted over 90 years so far. Plenty of states have almost split in that time, but ended up staying together & becoming stable. There’s a big one in North America, for example.
Well yes, but Quebec indendence movement is not totally dead yet…
Not everyone in the world has the same safety standards like western world…
Yeah, not even the western world… 🙂
Agreed, makes you think that despite it coming with political strings and not being the most advanced solution, had the IAF gone with the F-18E/F or F-16I, they may well be inducting their first sqd instead of playing games with the French.
Of course if they had just decided to buy off-the-shelf aircraft, no domestic production etc. requirements attached to MRCA tender, things would be different. That is what French offered them with Mirage 2000-5, but India wanted more ambitious route, so that’s why they are there now.
I would not say it is on the verge of breakdown. India has signed some deals quickly and efficiently via FMS for items such as C-17s and P-8Is that have been delivered on time (or even before time) and on budget.
Have they? I’m sure that is the case once the deal was signed, but how long it took from Indians before they got to that point?
Also, not all US deals have gone so well – for example INS Jalashwa.
India leads the world in bureaucratic inertia & ineptitude. Puts me in mind of the Russian Empire.
And it just seems to get worse…their military procurement is on verge of breaking down. Even a simple procurement takes a decade, to say nothing about domestic development.
“XXXX paper company: We cannot accept your tender because it is not on the correct pre-printed tender form. Your argument that the Government Stationery Office has run out of forms is not in the list of valid reasons set out in the regulations.”
This reminds me of a story how Finnish army lost Vyborg to Soviets in 1944: artillery battalion requesting shells from a nearby supply depot was denied…because the depot had ran out of correct forms.
Charge the relevant MoD & HSL people with treason & sabotage?
Naw, the trial would take 18 years…quicker to just buy new subs.
Given Iran’s previous submarine building experience….I don’t think anyone needs to worry.
One sank recently IIRC.
“In the land of the blind, one-eyed man is the king” 🙂
It’ll give good excuse for everyone else to start training ASW, if nothing else…
Worrying in the sense that there are no known subs in the region beforehand, no? Actually I was under impression that some sort of treaty was in effect banning submarines, but I probably imagined it…
Why would the radar scope be deliberately disabled? Even if I am in a bomber, I’d still like to know what’s around me.
Radars require quite a bit maintenance (especially old 60/70s technology radars), if it is not essential for the role, might just as well get rid of the radar entirely and lighten the plane. Also, for radar to be any good (especially radar of that era) pilot has to continuously operate it, and it gets difficult if you are already tasked for ground attack.
Novorossiysk has actually slightly warmer climate than Sevastopol. However it is subject to powerful winds sweeping down the mountains (bora). These can be quite damaging on occasion as can be seen by above picture…also, Sevastopol is just larger, better harbour, ready infrastructure, less civilian maritime traffic etc.
Of course, part of the increase is just good old-fashioned inflation. That said, this once again serves us an example why cutting resources from a project does not necessarily produce net saving.
Oh well, I’m sure Russians have some carrier hulk somewhere they can sell for a bargain…
But more seriously yes the 1155. lacks any area AD, though its up close protection is excellent.
I guess I have no issue with the Kerch being brought back to play flagship temporarily….wish they would replace Shtorm and those giant ugly guidance radars. Then we get into more serious and time consuming repairs though and the whole point is lost.
That Podberezovik is a beast.Kerch is equipped to lead a task force, whilst Udaloys are not
Could you go into more specifics?
AIUI, Karas were designed to lead ASW task forces (original plan was for a Kara to lead Krivak class frigates but it didn’t work out) so they have at least some sort of flag facilities, communications etc. Udaloys were designed to be more ‘line’ ASW ships and probably do not. I’m not 100% sure tho. That said, other fleets need their Udaloys so they probably can’t borrow one anyway. I guess they could transfer Varyag to Black Sea, but that is even less available.
I wonder what’s the condition of SAM and radar systems on Kerch, since they are old systems and last remaining examples. OTOH, since all other ships featuring those have been scrapped, maybe there are plenty of spares. No point upgrading newer systems on 40-year old hull, if it can scrape by remaining last few years. By 2018-19 there should be several new frigates available for BSF and Kerch and Smetlivy can be retired.
^That pic shows well how different hull shapes Kara and Udaloy have. Latter seems to have been designed for better seakeeping.
By the end of 2015, when Moskva is going off for repairs and modernization (taking Ustinov’s place @ Zvezdochka in the north), Kerch will be brought back into service and will act as temporary Flagship of the BSF.
Hmmm. Not out of the ream of possibility, but old man Kerch was slated for decomming soon. Wait and see what the preliminary repairs reveal I guess.
Awesome, my favourite BPK gets another extension!
It sorta makes sense when you think about it: they want gas turbine ships as they’re easier to deploy, but other fleets have no spare cruisers to borrow. I guess they could move an Udaloy to Black Sea, but those are sorely needed too, and Kerch is equipped to lead a task force, whilst Udaloys are not. Also they do not have area air defence system, whilst Kerch has Shtorm. Admittably obsolete, but better than nothing.
Zelenodolsk received an order for 5 more project 22100 coast guard ships, for FSB use in the North primarily. The lead ship of the class was laid down in 2012, and should be launched this year.
These are the biggest ships built by the shipyard, at around 3000 tons.
It’s kinda funny that such big ships are being built like 1000km from the sea. I wonder how big warships they could theoretically transfer via channel network. ISTR that there is a Krivak class frigate moored in Moscow.
No such thing as ‘Arabian Gulf’ 😛
“FMV stated that the primary purpose of the “Malmo operation” (note it was under armed escort! ….can’t imagine the MoD raiding Bae Systems with gun-toting guards ;-)) was to ensure that the state regained control of all advanced defense technologies attached to the A26 program so that it does not leave the country.”
Perhaps the Swedes didn’t do their homework or the Germans weren’t quite ready to hand over what the raid was set up to obtain:
“….it now appears that FMV officials left empty-handed, failing to locate or secure the classified defense documents and naval technologies relating to the A26, which sparked the raid.”
The thing is even if Saab take over all and buy the physical sites of the sub building subsidiary the intellectual property rights can be held by the parent company or other group company and not necessarily held in the Kockums subsidiary….perhaps ThyssenKrupp are looking to negotiate for a pay-off? (The new build submarine and refit contract is worth $4.5 billion).
Really, the Germans are unwise if they are trying to play hardball here. A government acting on what it perceives as a matter of national security does not have to play by the rules.