dark light

Axel-edwards

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 524 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wetland wildlife park #1837886
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    I do as little as I can out of the camera so most of it is in the camera

    in reply to: General Discussion #233821
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    I would doubt VERY much that Axel, has just started out on the road of photography. Ask anyone who has just started photography what the rule of 2/3 ds are, and they will look at you gone out. I did advise him however to get A/P magazine, where he will learn more from that, than he will on here.
    Jim.
    Lincoln .7

    you would be correct I started when I was five and I am now 18 so already around 13 years

    in reply to: Sunset #1837888
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    I would doubt VERY much that Axel, has just started out on the road of photography. Ask anyone who has just started photography what the rule of 2/3 ds are, and they will look at you gone out. I did advise him however to get A/P magazine, where he will learn more from that, than he will on here.
    Jim.
    Lincoln .7

    you would be correct I started when I was five and I am now 18 so already around 13 years

    in reply to: General Discussion #234225
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    No ill-feelings at all, Axel!:) Most of us are reasonable souls here, if a bit mad!!:cool: Anyway, as you know, I like your sunset!!

    thank you for understanding

    in reply to: Sunset #1838396
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    No ill-feelings at all, Axel!:) Most of us are reasonable souls here, if a bit mad!!:cool: Anyway, as you know, I like your sunset!!

    thank you for understanding

    in reply to: General Discussion #234230
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    I know im sorry for my outburst you should know that i am known for saying things i dont really mean because i have asperges syndrome and ADHD

    in reply to: Sunset #1838420
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    I know im sorry for my outburst you should know that i am known for saying things i dont really mean because i have asperges syndrome and ADHD

    in reply to: General Discussion #234333
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    also thank you

    in reply to: Wetland wildlife park #1838448
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    also thank you

    in reply to: General Discussion #234335
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    We fight because we have our freedom and it is our responsibility to fight so other people can have theirs as well, it may not concern us to begin with but asoon as peoples freedoms started to be lost it was a part of us until it is over, and the comments on here could be seen as slightly racist as you are saying that they will start blowing things up as soon as we leave, most of them were not doing that just some

    in reply to: Afghanistan – how long before #1838477
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    We fight because we have our freedom and it is our responsibility to fight so other people can have theirs as well, it may not concern us to begin with but asoon as peoples freedoms started to be lost it was a part of us until it is over, and the comments on here could be seen as slightly racist as you are saying that they will start blowing things up as soon as we leave, most of them were not doing that just some

    in reply to: General Discussion #234339
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    Not sure about that……taking a stupidly simple example just to make the point – if the photograph is out of focus, then technically it could be improved. Or would you argue that the effect might have intended, despite its obvious shortcomings?

    no the out of focus was not intended but i thnk it isnt really notisable as your eyes are drawn to the acctuall subject of the photo which is the sun set also you are the only one that has a problem with what i am saying noone else so have you considered that you might be the one that is wrong on this occasion

    in reply to: Sunset #1838481
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    Not sure about that……taking a stupidly simple example just to make the point – if the photograph is out of focus, then technically it could be improved. Or would you argue that the effect might have intended, despite its obvious shortcomings?

    no the out of focus was not intended but i thnk it isnt really notisable as your eyes are drawn to the acctuall subject of the photo which is the sun set also you are the only one that has a problem with what i am saying noone else so have you considered that you might be the one that is wrong on this occasion

    in reply to: General Discussion #234349
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    as always there is a technical element but that element will change depending on the phtotographer

    in reply to: Sunset #1838510
    Axel-edwards
    Participant

    as always there is a technical element but that element will change depending on the phtotographer

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 524 total)