You’ll be surprised what can be lifted with relative ease using a few scaffolding poles, some 5 tonne ratchet straps and 6-8 willing volunteers. Does look like some kind of mechanical funeral procession but it’s cheap and works.
Let’s not also forget that a c-17 can hold a lot of special forces paratroops. I’m sure there are both people drawing up contingency plans at the MoD and some of our MI6 friends keeping an eye on the situation in Argentina. Besides the Mail’s only real use is as an emergency toilet roll substitute.
Merry Christmas to you all BTW!
I just don’t understand why the Nimrod MRA.4’s were not modified to act as long range high altitude smart bomb trucks/storm shadow launchers. They had a huge bomb bay and we could have retired a few tornados from the bomber role and ended up with a superb maritime patrol and defence aircraft and a real strategic bomber all in one neat, cost effective and well utilised package. Still we could always push some MOAB’s out of our C-17’s. I’m sure the yanks have a few spare, after all with our Christmas gift of free harriers (just pay shipping and handling) and our political and financial support of the Joint Strike F*ckup they kind of owe us a favour.
There is however one reason they wont put anything into action. Our submarine fleet with tomahawks.
Also worth remembering that sometimes the best place to hide something is in plain sight. You are looking at an era were aerospace innovation was fast paced and we were at the sharp end. Most people wouldn’t know what they were looking at especially when you consider the amount of experimental and test aircraft about. If it flew in and was immediately moved to cover you would also be relying on someone being there with the knowledge to recognise it or having a camera just at the right moment.
I’m sure refuelling stops could have been carried out in greenland and iceland without too much of an issue, especially at night. Does anyone even have the vaguest idea of the ferry range of an Orenda PS.13 Iroquois engined Arrow with maximum internal and external fuel loads? In terms of operating the aircraft they could have used llanbedr or Machrihanish.
Never say never, it’s not that outlandish of an idea. Stranger things have happened.
May I suggest you place a large empty and thoroughly cleaned fuel drum near to your aircraft in which you hide wearing a suitably scary hockey mask or something similar. Another more sensible idea is to set a small night vision enabled camera up mounted inside of your aircraft and activated with a motion sensor covering the area of your fuel filler. It would even be possible to stream the image online if you have access to a wifi signal at the airfield or use a 3G gsm sender. You could then monitor from the comfort of your own home and even inform the police of the act being in progress which must open up the possibility of the thieves being caught in the act.
I live in the new forest but I’d be more than happy to set up the electronics for you if interested and needed! Either way good luck.
The sheer speed and accuracy of those control surfaces are remarkable. I can’t wait to see the first proper showcase of this thing. Any heads up on when we can expect further airframes to join the testing?
Agreed, the firefly seems reasonably priced considering the work done and the fact its in dollars.
Solent sky in Southampton is worth a look in if your in the area. You can walk around inside the sandringham (including the flight deck if you ask) and they have a few other gems like the sanders roe jet flying boat.
My kids enjoy the FAA museum the most. It’s a fantastic day out and if you have little ones the carrier experience will blow their socks off!
You could use rocket assisted takeoff in combination with the steam catapult for heavily laden aircraft. The Vulcan and victors would have needed a double wing fold like the gannet. Alternatively there could be a hanger ship that docked with the flight deck ship only when transferring aircraft for launch or after recovery.
For alternative launch options how about having a vulcan doing circuits of the carrier. You line the next v bomber up and along with the catapult have a large bungee cord attached to the nose glider style. The flying Vulcan uses a modified arrestor hook to catch the large loop on the other end of the bungee at high speed. A sensor detects the pickup and triggers the catapult which launches the deck aircraft with the flying Vulcan helping to heave it into the air.
Just a though, considering were thinking outside the box. Although probably impossible you have you admit it would be bloody entertaining to watch.
Its only meant to be a bit of fun. He said the largest aircraft to carry navy titles not the largest to be active on a squadron.
Would it not be possible to self publish digital copies of books like this through a retailer such as Amazon? I have a friend who has self published her novel on Amazon. Its costs almost nothing and the money from any sales goes directly to you minus a small deduction for the retailer.
The other advantage being that you can sell much cheaper while maintaining the same margin as you have no printing or distribution costs.
I apologise for this comment being somewhat removed from the subject of the thread, it was just a thought!
The one I would have liked to have seen in reality the most was still the DH.91 Albatross. I guess that’s got to be an order of magnitude more unlikely than seeing an ’86 rebuilt from the bits that are left!
If anybody does indeed have a contact number for Peter Wood I would be grateful if they could either pass it on to me or alternatively pass on my email address to him. [email]Wb556@London.com[/email]
Many thanks, Matthew
I did not unfortunately, he only had one and that went to a guy that collected it by strapping it to the roof of his Skoda.
Does anyone know of a set going spare? Long shot but you never know!