dark light

hardtarget

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 79 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fairey Gannet XT752 Takes To The Skies……….AGAIN! #821502
    hardtarget
    Participant

    Hi All, is there any news on ANY progress on her following court ruling to release the parts that were delivered to the UK and then ‘stolen’? Website is down, FB hasnt been updated, i fear this project is dead as its still in Goose Bay isnt it and without the parts she cant fly anywhere.

    in reply to: HJ711 got one turning #775743
    hardtarget
    Participant

    Could this ever be made into a flyer?

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2018 #775857
    hardtarget
    Participant

    It is a shame especially as its a sell out and i really wanted to attend but this front for a 12hr period is smack bang in the middle of the airshow section. Bloody shame as Monday is beautiful and Sat isnt that bad. Im a Sunday ticket and i will monitor up to sun morning and then decide.

    Im sure that min ft for takeoff and display is 1000-1500 (500m). With the CB between 250-500ft (70-150m) its safe to say they wont even take the covers off the aircraft. AC wont be able to transit from operating bases and add to that the strong gusts there is little chance of flying.

    in reply to: F6D Little Margaret….. #794872
    hardtarget
    Participant

    Badly damaged today after failing to take off from Woodchurch. The new owner who was flying it is ok

    Really, thats not good, Rob was having a little pleasure on Tuesday flying around WM, must have went off to Lashenden after that around 4. Spoke to him on FB last night stating this was going back tomorrow, today. Bot good for the new owner, speculation can start here as to the cause 🙂 Weather looked ok if a little overcast at times.

    in reply to: Peter Teichman to retire #798905
    hardtarget
    Participant

    The display at Southport this July will be the last one for Peter. He stands out as a very sharing person who deserves high accolades for many years of flying and devotion to restoring aircraft while juggling family and business.

    Source? its not public knowledge if he has and normally he keeps his following folk up to date on his FB page. Would be a tragic loss to the display scene and for North Weald.

    in reply to: Just Jane "She will fly again" video #800080
    hardtarget
    Participant

    R4118 – Whats makes you think so? If they raise the funds its highly possible she will.

    hardtarget
    Participant

    I believe they may be looking at a Legends booking after speaking to them on Facebook.

    in reply to: Report on Battle of Britain Airshow DX #830139
    hardtarget
    Participant

    I was there as saw with the mk.1 eyeball. It was a prop strike to the port stabiliser. My take on the event is as follows. It is my opinion of what i saw and may not be 100% accurate, which im sure an investigaiton will find that out.

    The two Mustangs turned in line abreast away from the far end to form onto sally b who was returning to line up for approach on the display line. Sharky was the inside AC (lower AC) and Miss Helen outside (higher AC). As they truned to sbt to form on to sally b, Sharky stood his ground (as if to form on her stb side (lower AC just behind and a bit below) rather than forming on her port wing slot (higher AC). With Sharky being the inside AC on the outward leg, he should have moved outward and gain height for the port slot however he clearly turns to stb for the sbt slot. In doing this, miss helens pilot not seeing sharky as he is to the rear and left, dropped slightly to get into position on the sbd slot and this is where there was a little got a little chop. Obviously if at the briefing Sharky was to take up this position then Miss Helen’s pilot is at fault, however with the formations and approach they were taking, i would have though the former should have happend.

    Im glad the issue worked out safely even if it was a bit hairaising at the end of the landing due to the high speed of the approach as he didnt have full flap on approach (presumably to prevent a stall and increase stability).

    in reply to: The CAA would have an airshow field day over this #831131
    hardtarget
    Participant

    Now that would be good demo for the Gunship team!

    in reply to: Biggin Hill Festival of Flight 2017 #840187
    hardtarget
    Participant

    I was there that day and on theexit of a loop he stared right at me with that spit nose oin a good 35 degree dive. Awesome.

    in reply to: Biggin Hill Festival of Flight 2017 #772337
    hardtarget
    Participant

    Dan performed what seemed the same display at Manston to that of Biggin. Everyting was within a TV screen in front of you, he rolled and pulled so tightly you thought the elevators and ailerons were going to break and then you remembered this is what it was built for and how it should be flow rather than a sedate fly past. This was flying a spit at its best and certainly challenged the great man. Rays’ was different however, he flew the spit in a graceful manner going to the extremes using the energy he had with loops and rolls. They were different displays of airmanship but I think this is the closest you will get to seeing spitfire flying at its best. Well done Dan and a great end to the show on sunday and i know you had a lot of fun in the pit.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2017) #798967
    hardtarget
    Participant

    Did anyone catch the landing approach to see if it had issues? We have also had AC misfire on approach as well catching the freshhold and bouncing up, Miss Helen comes to mind. wondered if this is the same?

    in reply to: Flying Legends 2017 #804250
    hardtarget
    Participant

    Well the list is complete, and with teh first opprotunity to see 5 Hurricanes in formation for the first time in my lifetime, its going to be a good one.

    in reply to: Biggin Hill Festival of Flight Saturday 11th June 2016 #854544
    hardtarget
    Participant

    Yes will be going with the family as we every time its on.

    in reply to: Gnat Display Team Crash 2015, Report out May 2016 #870693
    hardtarget
    Participant

    This was 12 hours on the Gnat only and averaged over the previous five years – were it not for the particularly low figure in 2011, the average would likely have been about 15 hours.

    If 12 hours per year on type is considered insufficient for display flying, we may have to say goodbye to seeing quite a number of aeroplanes in flight ever again 🙁

    Concur entirely with this statement. Id be interested to see all the display pilots and their hours for last 5 years on type before someone can say that’s insufficient or not. Does it say anywhere that you need to have x hours on a type per year? I would say this is potentially a problem should an AC be grounded for any reason. 12 hrs per display season doesn’t sound bad to me. 15 min display with transit of say 45mins equals 12 displays a season. Taking into effect bookings that’s not a bad return.

    He simply made a mistake as we all do.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 79 total)