dark light

mjr

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 676 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Four flying Lightning's together. #1279917
    mjr
    Participant

    so who’s the driver for big bad dog?? think it might have been a certain Virgin 747 left hand seat driver. hope he didnt call in sick! 😀

    in reply to: Four flying Lightning's together. #1280710
    mjr
    Participant

    Fantastic effort from all at ThunderCity……. 😎

    Be interested to know who was flying them all..?

    Congrats Thunder guys, you pulled it off afterall,

    What an absolutely collosal effort and achievemnet. To get 4 up at once is trully monumental, I doubt the DA themselves could have pulled it off! Hail Thunder City. Once again a foreign firm goes where our own cotton wool wrapped authorities dared not, and now its too late. So Well done mike and team.
    I dont know, whom No4 was, but the other three would be Mike Beachyhead, Dave Stock and Keith Hartley. No prices for guessing which ship Keith was flying! 😀

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook as it was and in 2006 #1282020
    mjr
    Participant

    peter,

    the set of wings in the crate are spares for 724, and the set on the ground are a set of Saudi f53 wings from Zf577 53-668, for use in LINCAIR’s T55 project.

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook as it was and in 2006 #1282510
    mjr
    Participant

    Xs899 being cut up, now thats an unbelivable sight.!! There is a 5 minute sequence on “Thunder and LIghtnings, a quest for power” ( Thunder city’s dvd) of the Cranfield ships being broken up by Nev and co. The longest sequence is of 899 resisting to the very last, whilst the muncher driver tries to snap the Starboard wing off. If you have ever wondered how strong a lightning really is, that sequence pretty much sums it up. Unfortunately I cant put the clip up on Key, copywright etc.

    in reply to: Local Council Threat To Kemble Airfield #1282801
    mjr
    Participant

    Best solution is for the airfield operator to let slip to the press, that hes had enough of all this harassment rom the council, and that hes decided to sell up, and infact has secured a deal to sell the land to a very nice Pikey, whom has offered a deal thats too good to be refused. 😀

    So, local belly ache brigade, whats it to be?, as is? or 15,000 caravans on site? :p

    in reply to: Last Shoreham….Possibly!! #1283425
    mjr
    Participant

    realist wise, Andys jumbles are mainly attended by those in South and cater for that, obviously there are people that do travel far from it. I dont believe that if this Jumble finished, it would particularly benefit Whitwick or Newark, they are just too far for those in South East, and South West. I personally go to Shoreham beacause its only an hour away. You need an event that is convenient for each region, as is the case at the moment.

    in reply to: Local Council Threat To Kemble Airfield #1283487
    mjr
    Participant

    Yes I agree, they are applied for, but are a formality, if you can prove the airfield has been used as an airfield with air movements for over 10 years, with no significant change of use, then the lawful use has to be issued along with planning permission. That’s the law. KAS will have inherited the historic lawful right to carry on as an airfield wich they can probably prove, since they baught it as an airfield, and use this to win the issue of a certificate from the council. Though the council can add restrictions, such as reduced air movements, and no escalation in activities from a point onwards. the council wouldnt have a record of lawful use issue anyway, since the airfield was previously MOD property. here is a case that there has been no change of use and the airfield has been used lawfully for decades, without resistance or hinderance, with the majority of the houses having been there during that period, regardless of a lawful use certificate or not. That is why such airfields such as Dunsfold, Rochester, headcorn, North Weald, Farnborough etc , are still there, despite the Councils attempts to wrong foot them years back using the excuse that they dont have a record of lawful use issue. They were there first, before the whinging brigades.

    IMHO Its about land redevelopment, and councils are under pressure to get big spaces re-developed. My local scrap yard had exactly the same stunt pulled on him, and after 5 years of the council trying every trick in the book, to get him out and put houses there, he won his lawful use, being able to prove that the site had always been a scrap yard ( for the last 35 years anyway), even before him. This is purely an issue because locals are whinging about it, and gives the councils an excuse to push it as is always the case with these notices. I doubt the district or county would have the impetus to instigate enforment notices without the local driving force offering a reason, but they can rely on the local parish and preverbial moaners lobbying their local MP and making noises. A sad state of affairs really that nambie pambie brigade cause so many problems.

    in reply to: Local Council Threat To Kemble Airfield #1283554
    mjr
    Participant

    :confused: what a joke, what is wrong with these idiot nimbies, who complain about noise from an airfield!?. Dont buy a house next to an airfield! And as for the council. what a load of poppy ****, how many times do they have to go through this airfield mallarky before they learn?? Lawful use certificate? get real! They know damn well that there will be no lawful use paper work from 70 years ago. there has been no change of use, just owner, and Kemble air services inherited that lawful use as an airfield.

    If the airfield has been used as an airfield for the past 10 years, (it has been used as an airfield for over 70 years), then rightful lawful use is defaulted anyway. Always amazing that local councils try on this stunt, with airfields, scrapyards, farms and the like, after ignoring it for well over the statuary period. Councils rarely prosecute and win an enforcement notice under lawful use act, where the current operator is using/doing the same thing that the premises has been used for for decades. There are 100s of examples where the council cant enforce. Dunsfold beng a case in point. Its still there 6 years down the line, despite the council trying it on. The council will issue the enforment, KAS will argue that its always been a lawful airfield, and the council will perpetually be a pain. Kemble operators should take legal action.

    in reply to: Last Shoreham….Possibly!! #1283683
    mjr
    Participant

    good luck with that, communications I mean.. hmm, have had similar experience with , great place, but a bit too much of the old school tie club heel dragging goes on, cogs stutter along, if you know what i mean. 🙂

    in reply to: Last Shoreham….Possibly!! #1283692
    mjr
    Participant

    Might have my dates mixed up here, but isnt redhill airshow at the start of September? at least I think it may have been this year anyway, a nice event to coincide it with. Brooklands is a nice venue, I think I heard that they held some sort of jumble event recently.

    in reply to: Last Shoreham….Possibly!! #1283702
    mjr
    Participant

    headcorn is too far into Kent, its not central enough or near enough to the main motorways. How about Redhill Aerodrome?, Hangarage, 5 minutes from the m23 and M25, people can still fly in. Re the event at Gatwick, it wasnt a a success. infact, honestly, it was a waste of time, hardly any stall holders attended. it was mainly books and the like. however, it was in addition to the one that had already gone ahead at Shoreham, not replacing it, and it was the weekend before or after Popham, already well established, (cant remember), it also clashed with Legends and one or two other events, The middle of June is the wrong time to hold an aerojumble IMHO, There are so many other event people are saving themselves for during June and July, people end up travelling 2-3 weekends in a row, perhaps an aerojumbled just drops right down the pecking order, especially with ebay being around. September and March are ideal, theres no other events really to distract.

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook as it was and in 2006 #1284581
    mjr
    Participant

    its a shame PK664 was never displayed properly after Binbrook.

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook as it was and in 2006 #1284596
    mjr
    Participant

    tut tut, obviously in the first picture you were taking pictures of WAFS using the hangar as an excuse.!

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook as it was and in 2006 #1284598
    mjr
    Participant

    Andy, you been inside the QRA sheds? Charles mentioned that one half is nice and the other has been trashed, used for storage of grain or something??
    pretty mad to think, that your qra’s will be the only ones in the country still being used to actually house Lightnings.!

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook as it was and in 2006 #1284605
    mjr
    Participant

    Sad, place indeed 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 676 total)