dark light

mjr

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 676 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: "Hot" instruments – clear guidance on buying from abroad. #952103
    mjr
    Participant

    Radium emits two types of radiation, alpha and gamma. Alpha radiation, high-energy helium nuclei, can hardly penetrate the skin but gamma radiation is harmful for some distance. Alpha radiation does become dangerous inside the body. The real danger is if small particles are ingested or inhaled. The body treats radium as it does calcium and radium will become incorporated into bone. There it will irradiate the surrounding area for years and can eventually cause bone cancer and leukemia.

    No. It emits all three by way of its decay chain and daughter products, Beta particles included. it depends which radium isotope it is , as to which is its primary emission. I believe that instruments are mainly 224 and 226, both Alpha particle emitters, hence why used in instrument faces, since the glass stops it all. It’s the Alpha and Beta that is dangerous however in the instruments, because of the high inhalation risk from exposure of dust particles from inside the instrument and Radon gas. Just don’t mess with them in a confined space. Use a dust mask and gloves if you must handle them in poor condition. If it’s been transported, theres a high risk that particle emissions have got outside of the instrument and into the box if the glass is not sealing or cracked, and/or the Radium paint is flaking off.

    in reply to: "Hot" instruments – clear guidance on buying from abroad. #952233
    mjr
    Participant

    very true, David Burke has hit the nail on the head. All your repsonsibilities are available in black and white on line

    in reply to: "Hot" instruments – clear guidance on buying from abroad. #952236
    mjr
    Participant

    MJR -If the ‘Russian diplomat’ your refer to is Alexander Litvenenko – he died as a result of a healthy dose of Polonium 210 in the tea he was served! The evidence
    of this being provided by a ‘hot’ teapot .

    That is correct, and demoonstrates my point. A healthy dose is miniscule! Btw. Once injested it does damage, simple. Have a look at the activity charts for Alpha emissions on it, then what resultant cell damage is effected. The simple fact of the matter is unless you know the exact position of the Radium decay, and ALL of its daughter products in relation to their stable isotopes along their chain too, and that none of the emissions have surface contaminated the instrument or escaped, the iunstrument is potentially very dangerous. At 70 years old, best bet is leave it alone.

    in reply to: "Hot" instruments – clear guidance on buying from abroad. #952252
    mjr
    Participant

    Individually they can be very harmful! As such they are controlled, quite rightly. In their prime, such Radon222 instruments were not a problem, since the glass, seals and paint were in good condition. The glass stopped all of the Alpha emissions, while what little Beta emission escaped, has a small enough wavelength that it wasn’t a problem.

    The dosage, stood infront of it is not the issue, that is less than your yearly exposure in most cases.The issue is that some of the instruments are 70 years old, seals have perished, glass is cracked, and the painted Radon pigment has broken down into dust and fragments. Airborne Alpha and Beta contamination from the decay chain and hence inhalation is real. The very short half life products in the decay chain are frivelous, and an inhalation risk. for instance, Polonium is one of the decay daughters, the same Polonium that killed the Russian diplomat from inhalation exposure, within 3 months, it’s a huge alpha emitter that kills tissue cells in hours once inhaled. If the instrument is in poor condition, I wouldn’t mess with it.

    Seriously, dont mess with them.

    I wouldnt even consider buying and shipping them if they are Radon instruments. They are all at leasy 60 years old

    PS nit just gamma detectors, they can pick up Alpha and Beta nowadays too. Gamma sticks out a mile.

    Ah – there’s a question.

    Personally, I don’t believe that individually, they are particularly harmful. I wouldn’t want to sleep with one under my pillow; nor would I want to own them in huge quantity (I don’t by the way; my stuff is clean!!).

    However, they have been deemed as harmful – principally to the nuclear industry worker who may visit an aircraft museum, and put his dosage over the limit I suspect.

    Bruce

    in reply to: Aircraft for sale at Gatwick Museum. #970005
    mjr
    Participant

    Quite so, the tenacity of the management to get this hangar project completed successfully really is admirable, well done guys! Especially seeming as some hard decisions have been faced regarding rationalising the collection-with hindsight and a shiny new building I’m sure the museum will look back and be sure they did the right thing 🙂

    It’s the tanacity of the entire volunteer compliment, not the “management”. Without the rock solid, less than ten volunteers, whom have worked hard with Peter Vallance and his elected trustees for the last 20 years, we wouldn’t be here now

    in reply to: Aircraft for sale at Gatwick Museum. #970919
    mjr
    Participant

    That plan looks great, I hope GAM pull it off. Fingers crossed for them!

    Everything is crossed!! Has Andy contacted you yet re prop matters etc mate? pm me if not, and I will give you his mail address 🙂

    in reply to: :eek: Cull at Gatwick Museum! #977419
    mjr
    Participant

    MJR – I understand your concerns ! However I also share the idea that its more manageable to at least house some of the aircraft in the long term if there is a realistic amount of ground space to aim for .

    That will largely be dictated by the local council authority. Much hard work is being done on that front.

    in reply to: :eek: Cull at Gatwick Museum! #977825
    mjr
    Participant

    Blue and Nimchick have expressed valid concerns about the number of airframes culled. As a long time volunteer myself, it is alarming to see one third of the airframes go so quickly from a large collection. Some were always earmarked as likely to go, some others, like the Gannet not. They have sold incredibly fast, which we have all been stunned at. The interest has been unprecedented.Obviously It’s a bitter pill that no one really wants to swallow, but it is warming that many of these airframes are going to HFL, a company that actually fly aircraft!

    The Victor cockpit and Jag were very close to being pots and pans, but both have been saved. No one wants to see the Gannet go, but it going to HFL makes it an easier medicine to take, hopefully it has a very bright future ahead of it with them. It is a shock that we are losing so many, but thankfully we still have all of the most important airframes to preserve, especially the rare runners. Hopefully it will have a positive effect on our long time planning issues and we can hold onto them in a nice dry building!

    in reply to: 100A inverter #997467
    mjr
    Participant

    Thanks mjr I will look at that but I think all phases were the same.

    hmm that is odd that all phases are down, I would suspect the controller then, but you could try and adjust the pile on it. The adjusting screw is on the front of the controller, near the cooling fins. if it hasn’t been disturbed it will have a red datum mark painted across the screw and body. Try adjusting up with that.

    in reply to: 100A inverter #997608
    mjr
    Participant

    we have a 100a inverter which seems to be running slow giving approximately 300 cycles and 90 volts it should be 400 cycles 115 volts can any one help with how to adjust it please.
    we have a copy of AP 4343B but gives no info on adjusting the inverter but I am not convinced the copy we have is complete also any information on the type 12 control panel would help also.
    Thanks in advance.

    I dont think you will adjust that out on the Carbon pile, its too large. Your have a deeper problem there if the frequency and voltage are that far out. things to check;

    1) check each phase output separately to establish which phase output is incorrect….

    2) once you have done that, check the noise filters for th low phase, 450v 50Uf If I rememeber correctly. If you have a filter or two broken down, that will affect it

    3) run it up off airframe without the type 12 controller, and see if your output is correct, type 12’s are solid state and they do cause problems when the start to go u/s

    in reply to: Aircraft for sale at Gatwick Museum. #999660
    mjr
    Participant

    Sold a loong time ago

    in reply to: Aircraft for sale at Gatwick Museum. #999792
    mjr
    Participant

    Thanks MJR,
    is that why the prices that were listed the yesterday were removed??

    Peter, yes thats right, there was a bit of a break down in communication, the prices were a mix up

    in reply to: Aircraft for sale at Gatwick Museum. #999809
    mjr
    Participant

    Thought this would be under discussion here.. Hopefully these airframes can all find good homes especially the Shack!

    http://www.gatwick-aviation-museum.co.uk/sale/forsale.html

    Please note, The advert is for expressions of interest not instant sale!

    in reply to: XL578 for loan ASAP #980263
    mjr
    Participant

    I have a rear bullet fairing complete if you are interested. it’s a swiss one, so has some minor differences, but bolts straight on. PM me if you are interested

    in reply to: Fancy a Thunder City jet? #996345
    mjr
    Participant

    The CAA would never allow a Lightning to fly and warned both Thunder City and the SA CAA about their safety concerns.

    If you have a spare hour, pull up the accident report and have a read. It makes interesting but shocking reading. It will prevent any Lightning flying again anywhere.

    Rgds Cking

    :rolleyes: Not quite…

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 676 total)