dark light

Y-20 Bacon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,666 through 1,680 (of 1,779 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Chinese stealth UCAV start roll #2272428
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Oh yes could be something like WS-12, forgot about that one (nozzle is quite similar to RD-93 no ?)
    http://i1163.photobucket.com/albums/q552/luritie/900x600_8FTJNO3154GQ0001_zps2cf173c9.jpg

    no

    http://pafwallpapers.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/jf-17_thunder_exhaust_idle_3-300x237.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2001294
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Not that it would surprise anyone here. Yet, I believe India’s only real option is the F-35C or F-35B. (I favor the former) As the Naval PAK-FA is yet to be developed and would be 20 years off! Further, the latter is really to big to operate efficiently from the Vikramaditya and/or Vikrant.

    So, personally I see little option. Of course India could continue to operate the Mig-29K’s, N-LCA, or possibly Rafales in the future. Yet, all are likely to be outclassed by a number of 5th Generation Types after 2020-2025.

    Yakovlev did have a model of a 5th gen looking svtol aircraft.

    in reply to: Turkish Air Force – News & Discussion #2272497
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    lets move on from the silly idea of f-5 trainers over t-38s

    Some useful information about Hurkus-C configuration 😉

    http://www.nefermenu.com/tai/_assets/pdf/tai-hurkus-c-eng.pdf

    where does Hurkus fit over KT-1s that TuAF already operates?

    in reply to: The Chinese stealth UCAV start roll #2272504
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    How so? Can it maneuver ?

    jf-17 is not known for maneuvering it’ll be fine

    in reply to: KF-X/IF-X & TF-X for Europe? #2272508
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    The ones that don’t have US/European components won’t be as good.

    like the j-31 right

    in reply to: The Chinese stealth UCAV start roll #2272519
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    looks like a single mig-29 engine in the butt.
    this is basically the unmanned stealth jf-17. i bet the PAF wish they waited for this!

    in reply to: The F-CK-1 IDF #2272523
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    when Taiwan unites with PRC, i wonder what China will do with all the Ching-kuos.
    would they keep them? use them to replace j-7s?
    would they rename it to Mao?

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    With all this talk about it being pointless for Serbia to have an air force because it surrounded by NATO. What if we have a scenario in a few years were Serbia does become a member of NATO and then hostilities or a minor conflict erupt with one of its neighbouring NATO countries. In this case NATO wouldn’t be able to invoke Article 5, leaving it up to military’s of both countries to defence their interests.

    If Serbia was to buy aircraft like the J-7, Yak-130 or Jf-17 as some people are suggesting. These aircraft would be most likely insufficient to defend itself against neighbouring forces which in all probability be operating F-16s, JAS-39 and Old Gen MiG-29 by that time.

    If Serbia eventually buyers more MiG-29M later down the track to deploy a fleet of atlest 12 to 24 aircraft. This will give the Serbian air force a good fighting chance over many of it neighbours or at minimum match their capacity.

    On the flip side of the coin the Flanker would just be overkill. Why does a country with such a small and mass need a long-range heavy fighter like a Flanker.

    Half of Serbia’s neighbors don’t have an air force.
    but Bulgars existence alone does complicate it.. now that Turkey is gone, they are facing Serbia was angst.

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    we all talk of the future I asked should Mig design a single engine fighter using parts and avionics already around well maybe Serbia should look to spend its money on going in with Mig and build the production line in Serbia it has a aircraft industry ?

    there was talk of an updated serbian Novi Avion design right hur
    http://tangosix.rs/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ml.jpg

    but doubt Serbia can afford to build such a thing.
    also if they did build it..it wouldn’t use Russian engines.. Serbia wanted French stuff inside of it not Russian.

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    TR1,

    The Russians are certainly interested in maintaining some sort of presence in Serbia (although perhaps not an overtly military presence). That said, Russia is certainly very interested in Serbian security matters – not least because Serbia is the least stable of the countries through which Gazprom is building the South Stream gas pipeline.

    ———————————————————

    More generally, I think some of you are missing the point a little. It could well be true that the M2 is the best option for Serbia but that does not mean to say that Serbia can afford it. No plane or capability is worth Serbia’s economic future at a time when that is threatened more than its military security. I doubt I need to explain in detail to anybody here that, beyond air policing, the M2 is only useful in a full-blown conventional war (in which scenario the small number of airframes calls into doubt its usefulness yet again). Serbia’s main security threat (beyond air policing) is low-scale conflict and counter terrorism against the potentially separatist ethnic or religious groups in the PreÅ¡evo Valley and Sandžak. MiG-29M2s are of no use for those conflicts whatsoever. A much more useful capability here would be equipping the armed forces (the Gendarmerie and army) to be able to operate at night and in poor weather – something like TI equipped ground vehicles, helicopters and UAVs would be more apt than fast jets. Somebody said the M2 comes with a useful ground-attack capability – I would argue that, in Serbia’s case, that capability is far from useful.

    With that in mind, raising debt in order to maintain a capability that would only truly be of any use in the extremely unlikely event of a conventional war against another state (again, Serbia is surrounded by NATO member states) is a hugely risky – I would almost say, potentially dangerous – move when the money could be better spent on supporting locally sourced equipment and training more suited to the country’s threat profile.

    your rational words fly over the head of mig-29 fanboys here who just wanna see a shiny new planes. almost all of them aren’t even from Serbia (except for Wander) so they won’t have to deal with funding issues.
    I agree.. more G-4 upgrades for you guys until the economy gets into shape and funding permits re-introduction of new supersonic fighters.

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Its not about shiny new migs. its about slow investment for rebearth pof air force. Not temporary covering holes of outdated air force. Decision was made to start a new project, if you will. That’s why 6 planes to start with is more than plenty for the next few years at least.

    I’m not disagreeing that on the paper Serbia does not have money for six Mig-29Ms. Of coarse we don’t 🙂
    Its 100% true that we better give up on air force altogether, and invest in hospitals, and new factories. But that is not going to happen. Decision to buy additional aircraft was made. No one knows how and when they will be paid exactly, and how long will that drag out. Deal might as well include Russian airbase in the middle of Serbia for all we know.

    ****

    Here is today’s article from same web page. Talks a bit why they are sticking with new Russian technologies after all.

    http://inserbia.info/news/2013/05/serbia-buying-russian-aircrafts-and-air-defense-systems/

    best regards

    wanderlust, thanks for the link.
    i see you understand the difficult situation in Serbia, but I can see you really are worried about its ability to defend itself especially when it has a neighbor fielding mig-29s.
    i can understand you’re concern over this threat.
    but the budget is so small.. it would be good if some how Serbia raises taxes and find other ways to increase funding. I understand that you feel its necessary to have mig-29m2 to protect serbia from bulgar.

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Actually I think if Serbia and Croatia aren’t really that interested in maintaining even a basic all weather air policing capability, then outsourcing the function to NATO/Russia would be the smart thing to do.

    I’m sure the Russians would love an airbase so close to Western Europe.

    Most of the rest of the Balkans doesn’t have any air policing capability and neighbouring countries that do seldom have much more capability anyway.

    lets see
    Serbia’s neighbors

    Bosnia: no fighters
    Croatia: dying mig-21 force
    Kosovo: no fighters
    Makedonia: no fighters
    Hungary: 14 Gripens
    Bulgars: 16 Mig-29s only. mig-21 to be retired, su-25 grounded
    Romania: 12 F-16s to replace Lancers

    I could see your point.. very impotent neighbors.. yet 16 Bulgar Fulcrums are a cause for concern, especially the aggressive nature of Bulgar foreign policies.
    perhaps Wanderlei is right and Serbia should get a newer better model of mig-29 to counter the older migs..

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    I think the worst option for Serbia (and Croatia) is to keep flying the antiquainted MiG-21s.

    Whilst there is no money now, there will probably be no money in the future either. Keep delaying the purchase of new aircraft and eventually you stop flying aircraft.

    I suspect this will happen to Croatia – they’ll “fly” the MiG-21bis to 2023 as basically a glorified 1960s day fighter with limited flight hours per pilot (less than 100 per annum) and then in 2023 they’ll scrap the ability altogether due to lack of funds.

    Serbia risks the same thing with their supersonic fleet – once it’s gone it’ll probably stay gone.

    well there’s no money now and maybe none in the future.
    mig-29s right now aren’t flying
    mig-29 refurbs aren’t flying either
    mig-29M2s can be bought so they’d have new aircraft that aren’t flying
    mig-21s barely flying.

    what do you suggest?

    perhaps they should go the way of the Baltics and just invite the Russians to open a base and let them do the air policing.

    Croatia is looking at purchasing additional 1970s vintage MiG-21bis to maintain a squadron of 12 a/c. F-7 with HOTAS, HUD, MFD, Mil 1553 Std, modern radar, modern AAMs, is a lot better than these old crates. But then with an overhaul/acquisition budget of US$28 million, beggars can’t be chosers.

    It also shows why Croatia’s MiG-21 will be the first and last fighter operated by that force. Government is unwilling to invest any money in defence. It didn’t buy new fighters before GFC and now has a handy excuse to not invest anymore.

    I think the bigger issue would be buying Chinese.[/QUOTE]

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    In the Croatian forums there is discussion of maybe obtaining some of 8 ex-Yemeni MiG-21s that the Yemenis cancelled the overhaul. Two of these 8 were ex-Algerian birds.

    The Yemenis originally contracted a Ukrainian firm to overhaul 30 of them but only took delivery of 22 and then cancelled the contract on grounds of poor work.

    The Croat enthusiasts are denying the poor workmanship claim and instead are stating Yemen made up the story so they could cancel the MiG-21 overhaul order which became superflous once MiG-29SMT’s were delivered.

    By any standard, Croatian fighter force is a pathetic joke. Most of the 10 airframes are unserviceable and there are no pilots qualified for night or bad weather flying.

    In a recent bombing exercise, the only pilots qualified to fly ground attack missions were the squadron commander and test pilot.

    in other words, they are no different than the serbian af

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    No more new build J-7, the production line is being decommissioned now the last export order has been completed! These are the last examples to come off the line for Bangladesh:

    As for JF-17 rather then Mig-29M2 whilst I agree it would be a good type for the Serbian airforce the latter will be easier to induct. It fits into current infrastructure, carries the same munitions and pilot conversion should be far easier. If Serbia has any sense they should look at acquiring a simulator as well meaning they can keep pilot currency up without using up airframe hours. A variant of the Rheinmetall Defence Electronics simulator of the Mig-29K for the Indian navy shown below is reasonable. If they can’t afford full motion at least a fixed dome example!

    you are right. No j-7s for them. probably no jf-17s either.
    its either upgrade mig-21s, fix existing mig-29s, or buy new mig-29m2 which will replace the existing mig-29s in storage.
    don’t feel bad.. South Africa places most of its new gripens in storage too.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,666 through 1,680 (of 1,779 total)