dark light

Y-20 Bacon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 1,779 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Finland Air Force #2246451
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    are you sure.. mig-31 for finland.. really?
    a bit overkill

    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    You are joking, aren’t you? Compare the length of each leg of Tamouré, & remember that they were one way, & unarmed. You’re envisaging flying a round trip, each leg of which is about 50% longer (without taking into account the extra distance to avoid overflying Brazil for half the route) than any leg of Tamouré (i.e. flying three times as far non-stop), & doing it armed – & you think that’s (1) possible with two tankers, & (2) would win a war. And you even propose burning even more fuel by going supersonic!

    As I said, LOOK AT A MAP!

    harro kitty kat

    using daft logic
    falklands to ascension island is roughly 6,000km

    the french if they used French polynesia (flying around the tip of argentina) or French Guyana (flying around brazil)
    would be about 8,300km

    in reply to: should India have gotten Su-35 instead? #2246524
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    India shouldn’t go for the aircraft China is purchasing

    but I understand Indian fears of China’s sudden Su-35 purchase and the vulnerabilities of the Rafale.
    the French would’ve never sold the Rafale to China (not because they don’t want to but they can’t).

    in reply to: Why China's air power does not seem threatening. #2246531
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    In that case, you can include yourself in the list of ultra-nationalist fanboys who immediately respond whenever anyone says anything against their airforce/country, and in your case like JSR it’s the RuAF and Mother Russia, as demonstrated by your posts in this thread and others…
    All we need now is the contribution from the Islamists in the form of PLA-MKII, and the thread will be complete with nationalistic flag waving from most corners of the world.

    I assure you TR1 is no fanboy.. ok slight sensitivity to Russian aircraft, but TR1 is a good boy or girl (i dont know gender or name). If you were trapped in a burning house TR1 would ask you if you need food before walking off.

    now as for fanboys loyal to mother russia. most of them are not even Russian
    haarvalalala is norwegian (at least in name), msphere is french, and jotaku is mormon.

    even some of the chinese fanboys are not chinese
    like golden dragon and pla-mkii

    us fanboys.. we got a few indians and spaniards.

    however french fanboys tend to be only french. why is that.

    in reply to: Brazil as a military power #2247722
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Yes Embraer has been one of the most efficient global aircraft manufacturers in taking advantage of unexplored niches in the world market. But be careful not to put in the same basket civilian commercial product lines such as biz jets and light civilian transports with advanced weaponized military products such as supersonic fighters. Since most of Embraer’s corporate revenue comes from their civilian line it is absolutely not to their advantage to have this civilian line “pay” for sales of indigenous supersonic fighters to countries that are no the best of friends with the US.

    Regards,

    Hammer

    or embraer can work with the US just like how they worked with Italy with the AMX?

    btw I noticed you are a hammer
    did you do this?
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/rugby-player-matthew-probert-hammer-2246271

    in reply to: JUST A NICE PIC – Mirage III #2247728
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    maybe you might know this
    but which exact Mirage III aircraft has the most kills ever?
    its likely an IDF one but which.

    in reply to: Two Aircraft Design Ideas for CAS in Contested Airspace #2247739
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    lets revive this topic and revive PLA-MKII who has disappeared after eating his usual dish of curry and big mac.

    since we’re talking about Pakistaniland

    would a prop based CAS solution be more effective than a helicopter one?

    in reply to: Brazil as a military power #2247742
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Like any privately owned corporations wants the Brazilian government to prioritize defense programs that give it the largest share of governmental investment. What`s so unique in this point of view? On the other hand developing, building and especially exporting advanced fighter aircraft is sure to expose the company to US restrictions or even sanctions, things very bad for the prospect of exporting Brazilian civilian/commercial aircraft, Embraer’s cash cow, to the largest market in the world, the US…

    Comments,

    Regards

    Hammer

    hey stud.
    well thats why i said, sell a niche product the US does not sell. Just like how Embraer does well because it has no competition from Boeing or Airbus.
    and that area right now is light fighters

    in reply to: Brazil as a military power #2247747
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Y-20 Bacon

    While your assessment of Brazil’s strategic realities is spot on, your beach knowledge is lacking.

    There are no nude beaches in Brazil and no-one ever dares to bare there. Brazil is a very religious and well-mannered place so while it is perfectly OK to wear a bikini that only functions at a sub-atomic level, it would be unthinkable to take it off.

    However the Russians are mad for it – snow or no snow.

    i do not understand this sub-atomic bikini.
    could you please post pictures?

    in reply to: Westernisation of Eastern European Air Forces #2248132
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    big bob thobb

    you’re right about Poland, they’re still very much active in the defense industry.

    look at their new tank unveiled this week! (it has a bit of swedish dna they say)
    PL-01
    http://www.janes.com/images/assets/624/26624/1513470-main.jpg

    they also had another one called the Anders
    http://www.army-technology.com/projects/6528/images/135498/large/2-three-crew.jpg

    supposedly they’re competing against each other.

    in reply to: Russia vs China in terms of product support #2248162
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    i don’t know about airplanes
    but Thai sources have been very unhappy with their Chinese sourced ships and tanks.
    not even in service for 20 years, and the Thais dumped all their Chinese tanks in the ocean.
    their general basically said the reason why they bought them was due to Thailand’s limited budget at that time
    and very good chinese pricing. the quality of the tanks were not very good and the main problem was
    once the chinese stopped producing them, spares and supplies dried up very fast, making them inoperable.
    on the other hand old russian tanks that are out of production can still run due to plethora of spares.
    but again thats tanks.

    in reply to: Brazil as a military power #2248163
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Embraer make successful bizjets, succesful supertucano etc… no point in criticizing them tbh

    Embraer finds success in markets that are not dominated by others. i.e. bizjets, small airliners, etc.
    Russians, French, and American’s aren’t really doing the light fighter thing anymore
    perhaps they got some potential
    Chinese aren’t going to get far with their jf-17
    neither the Koreans
    Saab is the only real rival for them.. but if they can offer the same for less..

    its samba time.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2248167
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant
    in reply to: Brazil as a military power #2248168
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Guys please cut Jungle Boy some slack, he is just echoing the general impatient and disheartened mood that we have been recently taking hold of many of our defense related internet forums. It is true that the lack of contracts signed this year clearly symbolizes the Brazilian government’s significant economic-related unease. The local currency has sharply devalued in comparison to the US dollars and the (government induced) heated internal demand for gas and diesel is uncomfortably multiplying the international payments deficit. So naturally this is far from the best moment to create new dollar-denominated debts. The truth is that ALL the military reequipement plans are still valid. The times may have slipped but the plan is still the same. 15 diesel electric subs, six nuclear powered subs two aircraft carriers, a new northern fleet base, thirty new surface warships, etc. The National Defence Strategy breaks Brazil’s main military interest in two areas: a) The Amazon and b) the South Atlantic Ocean that hasn’t changed at all. Brazilian newly built OPVs have been calling regularly on African nations to try to build long term international relationships focused in developing their own armed forces, especially navies. In October one of these OPVs, probably BNS Apa, will go to Angola for their national day commemorations. It is true we don’t have any clear and present “enemy at the gates” but the Government is starting to understand that there is a good geopolitical payback in assisting our neighbors on how to better use their own military means. The Brazilian defense industry is the key player in this process, it is they’re ability to leverage government investment and to turn it into exportable goods and services that is really pushing the military reequipement plans forward. The Brazilian defense industry is currently not structured in its final ideal configuration and many of our deep pocketed giant construction companies are still examining what is the the most effective way forward for them… as soon as this economic turmoil passes contracts are bound to be signed. Money for the four diesel electric and for the first SSN is flowing and progress is happening at a brisk (actually unheard of before in Brazil military history) pace. The same can be said about Embraer’s upcoming KC-390 airlifter, everything is on track and all the milestones are being met as planned. This last month alone the first modernized AM-X attack fighter was delivered to the Brazilian Air Force and the first modernized A-4Ku has been returned to the Brazilian Naval Aviation. The “news” of second hand aircraft and ships is no more than internet gossip that gets repeated in the highly frustrated environment of the Forums, just that. No Brazilian armed forces is REALLY considering the purchase of second hand aircraft or ships. If it does not mean new hightech jobs and transfer of technology for the local industry it is just not going to happen. The main reason behind the repeated delays of the F-X2 fighter bid is the fact that it just does not interest Embraer that much, to it government 2 billion US dollar investment makes much more sense on the KC390 (100% Embraer AND obviously much more easily exportable) then on any F-X2 fighter that might be selected. Without strong industry demand for it the expensive next gen fighter tends to languish in government investment priorities. Prosuper is still on, recently sources at the Ministry of Defense have pointed at a possible win by Germany with a hybrid frigate based on the F124 hull design but equipped with the Thales Nederlands I-Mast 500 and with MBDA Aster missiles in place of the German original APAR radar and the US Standart air defense missiles… But to the Brazilian Navy the first priority is to get the new Brazilian corvette program going. This is parallel to the Prosuper but uses the Barroso hull with the Thales I-Mast 100 and a brand new stealth design superstructure. Start of construction on the first of this class is expected for Nov-Dec next year. The corvette`s redesign is ongoing right now. Four of these will be manufactured in Brasil in the first production tranche. On the Army purchase of new anti aircraft artilery (jointly with the air force) is moving and just some days ago the ministry published the order for the set up of an evaluation/negotiation team to finalize the purchase from Russia of Igla MANPADS and for three full batteries of Pantsir S-1 one for each armed force. Production of the Guarani APC is running with the first batch already in tests around the country. So if you brush away the impatience you see that much is actually happening at this moment. Best Regards, Hammer

    So Embraer wants more Embraer?
    Embraer should make its own aircraft then.
    maybe work with the Koreans or Turks who are desparate for partners.

    in reply to: Why China's air power does not seem threatening. #2248170
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Israel did not invent the sneak attack. The Japanese attack Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941 , and practically destroy the entire U.S. Navy Pacific fleet in a “Israeli pre-emptive” sneak attack.

    except that they only really destroyed three of the battleships, zero of the carriers, and all other damaged ships coming back by 1942 and heavily damaged ones by 1944. in which case their original objective to destroy high priority objects could be considered a failure.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 1,779 total)