ML407 out and about over Sussex
ML407 was loitering over Lewes at around 12:40 today flying as if holding for soemthing, then headed off towards Brighton, and did some loops and rolls.
Looked beautiful against a blue sky with broken white clouds…managed to grab some photos but too far away to be worth posting…
Came back over Lewes at 12:50 and headed off North up the Ouse valley.
Lovely!:)
Andy,
Well done to all involved, one more family finally have the answers to years of uncertainty…
…and one more of the brave lads has belatedly been given the honour and respect he deserves.
I can’t begin to imagine how you must feel, but I sense your humility will always lead you to say you have done very little compared to the sacrifice made by those ‘missing’ aircrew you help to find.
The nation owes you and your colleagues a big thank you for your ongoing efforts to help reduce the list of the “missing” one name at a time.
Paul
As well as the investment in training double the pilots, or of flying half the missions with two pilots per aircraft, maybe the fact that RAF moved over to flying night missions may have played a role too?
Perhaps the RAF powers that be believed that the chances of being hit by gunfire was lower at night, thus there was less chance of injury to the pilot, whereas daytime missions might be more susceptible to interception/attack/damage/injury, whereupon a second pilot might be a sensible back-up?
Austern makes a good point – are there any statistics to show how often the USAAF/USAF aircraft came back courtesy of the co-pilot because the Captain was wounded/killed in action? Sitting so close together would seem to risk a high chance of both pilots being wounded simultaneously?
A330/A340 d’oh! I didn’t think to count the engines!
(As I mostly inhabit the historic board I’ll claim that modern civvie types all look too similar these days :o.)
Thanks for the correction. Perhaps the mods can correct the thread title to save my ongoing embarrasment!
Good to see it ended so well.
Done!
Who needs de-icer – just let the airflow blow it all off, after all it’s only snow….. :diablo:
Maybe the aircraft had been de-iced before push-back but this lot then fell afterwards … it did seem to fall off fairly easily, so must’ve been pretty loose
…but even so 😮 😮 😮
We must have spotted story at about same time ATR, I double checked it before posting a new thread myself – you must have posted while I was typing mine up.
Maybe mods can merge threads?
Ah, ATR beat me to it… and I thought you lot were asleep!
More here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-17730154
All seems to have been fairly routine and precautionary, though to park it and want to deploy chutes on the runway at a singe-runway airport suggests they believed it to be potentially serious, and wanted to take no risks wth those aboard.
Well done to all crew and services involved for getting everyone off safely.
Seeing that promo brochure brings back some memories…I think I have a copy hidden away somewhere too.
I remember first seeing them in the two-tone blue Stampe era, a gentle yet precise display with a very close mirror formation IIRC, and then the next year they were using the white and blue Pitts’ which was all “noise and adrenalin” due to the increased power and manoeuverability the new mounts offered.
I seem to remember that the Team pilot line-up often changed from season to season, Dave Perrin (? sp) is a name that rings a bell as another member of the team at some stage.
Was Philip Meeson ever a pilot with them? My memory suggests he was with the later Marlboro’ aerobatics team after a few seasons doing a solo Pitts display, but I don’t remember if he was ever with the Rothmans team?
I seem to remember the Malboro team followed on from the Rothmans team, though I do not remember it being a direct “descendant” as such (i.e. I don’t think it was simply the same team under new sponsorship), I think there was a time interval between the two teams, with Marlboro being later evolution of a similar concept…but much time has flown since those days so my memory may well be incorrect?
Paul F
– but even if we had used the car I don’t think there were any problems as far as i could see
It is often a bit of a bun-fight getting off the airfield as flows within the parking areas are left to the motorists themsleves (never enough marshals), and you always find some idiots who ignore those forming orderly queues and try to force their way in as close to the exit gate as possible :rolleyes:.
However, once through the gate and onto the perimeter road, traffic flows are very good – no doubt the policy of only allowing left-turns onto the dual carriageway A27 helps as there is no need to stop the flow to allow “right turns” across the A27 passing traffic. Likewise people parked in the offsite carparks to the south of the railway have a controlled “left turn only” exit, which also stops them trying to turn left (across the single carriageway A259). Fortunately positioning of traffic roundabouts on A27 and A259 facilitates a better exit flow than might otherwise be the case if traffic had to turn right across passing traffic on both roads.
(I seem to remember airshows at Boscombe down had similarly good exit flows due to “left turn only” exit onto the A303 dual carriageway?)
Although some people have to head in the wrong direction initially as they leave Shoreham (myself included), it is clear that the benefit of good traffic flow out of the venue is worth the mile or so “long way round” via the next roundabout.
Back onto the subject of “lost aishows” as per thread title, in the 70’s (and perhaps 80’s?) a number of relatively small airfields also had pretty impressive annual airshows – Fairoaks ran shows for a few years, and Goodwood likewise.
The Goodwood shows usually attracted the RAF display acts of the period (Jet Provost team – Red Pelicans, Macaws etc, Phantom, Lightning) as “non landing” items, with a mix of historic and GA types in the program too. They even used to attract the Red Arrows some years. In some ways the Shoreham show reminds me of the Goodwood shows.
Fairoaks was perhaps more constrained by the proximity of Heathrow airspace, and I don’t remember any fast jets appearing, usually historic pistons, GA/aerobatic types and the Tiger Club type acts.
Booker (aka Wycombe Airpark) also held a few shows, “Sally B” was a surprise appearence at one of them just after she had first arrived in UK.
As has been mentioned, ever longer displays, and the move towards ever larger “family focussed” events (aka funfairs, double glazng, car sales etc) were once seen as the way forward by organisers and smaller events fell by the wayside. But perhaps some headline events simply grew so large as to be unmanageable, and as ever more legislation tended to impact upon their approach. Poor visitor experience (esp. traffic chaos and security “bag checks”) and the contraction of many Western airforces (none more so than the RAF!)has perhaps seen the public start to get fed up with the mega-long approach given the lack of variety of aircraft types now available for booking?
Personally, shows like (R)IAT seemed to focus more on the length of their flying display rather than the “quality” of the display – six hour flying displays are fine, but there are only so many times I want to watch F16s perform in one day! Especially if I know I am going to have to face a two hour traffic jam to get out afterwards.
In recent years some of the new(er) show venues seem to have spotted the niche, and have started to meet the need – Breighton, Rougham, Woodchurch, Damyns Hall etc
Fewer, but “more varied”, acts and easier entry and exit win every time for me these days. I haven’t been to RIAT for years, and to be honest I don’t really miss it even though I’ve never seen an F22.
Shoreham is perhaps running the risk of outgrowing itself too I fear, the flying display has got a little predictable, though the unique backdrop does give it a unique flavour, and crowd size seems to be self limiting due to parking space. Maybe Shoreham has taken on some of the mantle of the Biggin Hill shows?
Personally I’d rather see more smaller shows as candidates for my entrance fee than fewer “mega-shows”, but yes I agree, some of the former shows with unique atmospheres such as Mildenhall are much missed.
Paul F
Please excuse my ignorance, I did a quick wikipedia but didn’t find the answer.
Is this being stolen to sell on or for their own use or can avgas be used in automotive vehicles?
Beejay
Beejay, I don’t know the answer either, and I doubt those stealing the fuel do, nor care less either – they’ll presumably sell it on to anyone who wants some cheap “fuel” no questions asked etc.
If your car/bike/mower/van runs a little rough then you’re hardly likely to complain if you know the fuel you got cheap was off the back of a lorry (or more exactly out of the wing of an aeroplane) are you?
And if they sell it on to a dodgy filling station, by the time a few gallons of any hydrocrabon fuel are added to a storage tank of pukka unleaded, leaded or even diesel, they will have little noticeable effect.
Its like the barstewards who nick the railway signalling cables, they don’t care that their actions could have serious (i.e. potentally fatal) consequences, nor really care what happens to the goods they have sold on afterwards, all they see is a few quid earned…
A sad sign of the times….
Having filled my distinctly “average” family car with fuel from near empty yesterday, and paid the forecourt a stinging £72 for the priviledge, I suddenly realise why tanks are being drained – I’d never really thought about it before, so I guess an avergae GA type holds a lot more “fuel” than my car, so its easy to do the maths and see why they are such an attractive target, esp if fuel drains or filler caps are not lockable. I’m just glad my car’s filler cap is lockable and that it lives on my driveway with PIR-sensor spotlight covering it… I guess a dark airfield is an easier hunting ground, esp once it is known to be an easy target.
Paul F
Hi Orion,
Nice photos.
“A friend and I visited Duxford today, a very deserted Duxford – really odd!” – Yes, I was there mid morniing on Friday 20th Jan, and it was really eerie at times being the only person wandering round.
There were a few other visitors around, but few seemed to venture far beyond the “Airspace” hangar – though the inclement weather probably put them off venturing too far.
However, it did mean I could take photos without worrying about people getting in the way! Yes, I agree light levels are poor/variable in the hangars, esp on a gloomy day if/when all doors are closed – I resorted to racking the camera ASA up fairly high myself (as flash only lights a very small area, so doesn’t work too well except as a “fill-in” to lift a few heavy shadows etc.).
Its a few years since I was last there and it was good to see the Beaufighter coming along, and the CR42.
Paul F
The port outermost flap fairing/”carrot” seems to be missing, though I suspect it is simply hidden by the glare from the landing light…?
Paul F (0n a rare foray over from Historic….)
The Aichi type number caught me out, not the Wellesley….. 14 right, but missed his G K questions…..
To be honest I was waiting for some real tough questions and they never really came….
He’s not alone, there are a fair few other “notable” RAF aircrew there too….plus a few other RAF names who gave their all but without knowing the “fame” that others alongside them suffered/enjoyed.
Neville Duke and Teddy Donaldson are among them.
A peaceful place indeed, well worth a few moments reflection (and thanks) if you are ever visiting Tangmere museum just up the road.
Paul F