Yep, built a load of Airfix stuff in my now distant youth.
First example was the “plastic bagged” 1/72 Auster Antarctic (well, in reality I helped by watching my Dad build it for me), I was allowed to choose the undercarriage fit and opted for skis (the “spare” wheels and floats went in the bin) next was their old Bf109, another choice required in terms of the air intake filter and markings……from then on I built them myself.
Particular favourites included the Saab Viggen, Hawker P1127, DeH Heron, Spitfire V, MRCA Prototype, BAe Hawk. A few 1/144 airliners included a Boeing 707, and a 747, and a Vickers Vanguard, but soemhow it was always the 1/72 models that caught my eye.
I also branched out into other brands’ ranges too – Matchbox produced some wonderfully crisp models, with excellent fit of parts, unlike some of the airfix moulds where fit was often a bit rough.
My last builds were for my son a few years ago now, but unfortunately they failed to fire his imagination, despite half reasonable results. He has a few unbuilt models he never got around to building, perhaps I can have a go at them when he goes off to Uni next autumn.
I got into the “instant gratification” fix offerred by diecast models when Corgi started their 1/72 range, their results are (usually) so much better than anything I could achieve 😮
Paul F
Ray was always 434’s chief pilot, Neil only covered when Ray was unavailable which wasn’t very often.
I stand corrected – it was certainly my impression (and/or failing memory) that Neil flew her more often back in the 70’s. Apologies to Ray’s memory if I was wrong. Either way she was in safe and very competent hands whichever of those two were flying her, and both would produce smooth, flowing displays that complimented her elegant lines.
Paul F
Hell’s teeth! It makes the mouth go dry reading it! What an astonishing piece of analysis – one cannot help thinking that most pilots this happened to would have been making their report to St Peter… 😮
Adrian
IIRC Neil Williams had graduated from the ETPS, and so was both a fully trained test pilot, and a world-class aerobatic pilot, so if anyone stood any chance of getting out of the situation in one piece it was he. Still an absolutely incredible piece of airmanship though, demonstrating what can be achieved with the necessary skills, and with detailled knowledge of the airframe structure around you – and very worthy of the subsequent award for outstanding airmanship.
As Pogno said earlier, I too remember him hopping between very different types at Old Warden shows, and elsewhere. And his displays in MH434 were perfection – pre-dating the arrival of a certain Mr Hanna at her helm.
NW regularly flew aircraft from the PPS fleet for Doug Bianchi, including the Yak 11 which DB had restored. He also flew Tiger Club types at displays, test flew Des St Cyriens Sopwith Pup rebuild at Fairoaks, and flew Patrick Lindsays fleet (IIRC). NW also represented UK in World aerobatic championships ona number of occasions, and his input helped bring the UK-built Cranfield A1 (G-BCIT) into being, in hope of competing with the Russian and US-built specialist aerobatic types starting to dominate the competition (Pitts, Sukhois etc), as UK were still flying Stampes, Tiger Moths and things like the Cosmic Wind “Ballerina” against them, with little real chance of success.
Despite all this “excitement” in his career, he also flew relatively “straightforward” ferry flights on various types, and piloted executive charters. It was whilst ferrying a CASA 211 back to UK from Spain that he was killed.
For more info, try looking out second hand copies of “Airborne”, a compilation of the autobiographical articles he wrote for Pilot magazine amongst others, which includes the tale related by Pogno, and also recounts the Zlin wing-folding incident in detail. I have read, and re-read my copy many times.
DB also wrote short articles for Pilot magazine, all with a very wry sense of humour – I could rarely read one without laughing out loud. Both he and NW had the ability to capture technical detail on the written page yet not leave the armchair-bound non-expert behind.
RIP Neil and Doug, you both did much to help get the UK restoration and Warbird scene get on it’s feet. We all owe you so very much.
Paul F
Hi AA,
Have responded to your PM, and suggest we use PMs until you/we have something worthwhile to post, or until we need more help – there must(?) be more forum users based in the Brighton/Lewes area, but I don’t know of any.
Cheers
Paul F
Surely it’s not beyond the whit of computer manufacturers to fit “fluff catcher” ( Switches to best Frankie Howerd mode…oooh er Missus!) meshes over cooling intake vents on the external casings of laptops and full size CPUs ? The larger fibres could then be filtered out of the intake airflow at that point, and the build up would be both readily visible and easily removed by mini-vac (other cleaning products are available) without any need to disassemble the PC casing and get inside the beast?
Are PC Manufacturers unaware of the “real worlds” in which their products are used these days, do they still think we still all use our PC’s in special airconditioned, near sterile, working environments…?
(Switches to best conspiracy theory whisper) Or maybe they intentionally leave such obvious improvements out of their products in the hope that x% of PCs will get their cooling systems clogged up every year, then over-heat, get damaged beyond economic repair as a result of being gently cooked to death, and thus generate a steady “replacement purchase” market stream…..
Also, fitment of effective fluff ‘n fibre filters might also rapidly put their far eastern “USB Mini Vac” manufacturing colleagues, and their authorised PC repair agents out of business I guess….
I hate to think what microorganism nasties many domestic PCs are harbouring inside their darkest nooks and crannies given the likely build up of carpet fibres, pet hairs, clothing fibres, human hairs…. yeeeuch, don’t even go there…. Might be safest to fumigate the machine before removing the case, or it’s resident colonies might try and fight back 😀
Paul F
Surely it’s not beyond the whit of computer manufacturers to fit “fluff catcher” ( Switches to best Frankie Howerd mode…oooh er Missus!) meshes over cooling intake vents on the external casings of laptops and full size CPUs ? The larger fibres could then be filtered out of the intake airflow at that point, and the build up would be both readily visible and easily removed by mini-vac (other cleaning products are available) without any need to disassemble the PC casing and get inside the beast?
Are PC Manufacturers unaware of the “real worlds” in which their products are used these days, do they still think we still all use our PC’s in special airconditioned, near sterile, working environments…?
(Switches to best conspiracy theory whisper) Or maybe they intentionally leave such obvious improvements out of their products in the hope that x% of PCs will get their cooling systems clogged up every year, then over-heat, get damaged beyond economic repair as a result of being gently cooked to death, and thus generate a steady “replacement purchase” market stream…..
Also, fitment of effective fluff ‘n fibre filters might also rapidly put their far eastern “USB Mini Vac” manufacturing colleagues, and their authorised PC repair agents out of business I guess….
I hate to think what microorganism nasties many domestic PCs are harbouring inside their darkest nooks and crannies given the likely build up of carpet fibres, pet hairs, clothing fibres, human hairs…. yeeeuch, don’t even go there…. Might be safest to fumigate the machine before removing the case, or it’s resident colonies might try and fight back 😀
Paul F
Hi AA,
I live in Lewes, and believe the C-47 came down close to the site of the current Newmarket Pub/Restaurant, which would tie in with T-21’s comments above. The current A27 trunk road takes me past the site most days.
I am happy to follow the matter up locally (town library archives etc) if you need me to. There have been a number of articles in local press (over the 20 years we have lived there) relating to wartime aviation incidents in and around the town, and the C-47 crash is one that is always mentioned.
Paul F
Pete,
How do you think some people react when they hear that Lottery funding is going towards other causes that they personally have no interest in, or perhaps that they do do not support or understand, such as perhaps arts groups, theatres, ballet troupes, youth organisations, aviation heritage projects and so on?
I doubt there is any single lottery benefactor that no-one has objected too – it’s a case of “each to their own” surely.
If your complaint is that these two benefactors are reputed to be wealthy organisations, then get involved in working with causes you deem to be more appropriate benefactors, and do your best to ensure the less well off causes you support get their fair share of lottery hand-outs.
However, expect a few objections from others if/when your causes are chosen – however “cash poor” the causes may be there will be someone who doesn’t see them as suitable beneficiaries.
Paul F
Pete,
How do you think some people react when they hear that Lottery funding is going towards other causes that they personally have no interest in, or perhaps that they do do not support or understand, such as perhaps arts groups, theatres, ballet troupes, youth organisations, aviation heritage projects and so on?
I doubt there is any single lottery benefactor that no-one has objected too – it’s a case of “each to their own” surely.
If your complaint is that these two benefactors are reputed to be wealthy organisations, then get involved in working with causes you deem to be more appropriate benefactors, and do your best to ensure the less well off causes you support get their fair share of lottery hand-outs.
However, expect a few objections from others if/when your causes are chosen – however “cash poor” the causes may be there will be someone who doesn’t see them as suitable beneficiaries.
Paul F
I totally agree with you. I’m sure there are no way near as many jets there as when it was RAF.
True enough, but there are far more of the “upwardly mobile” and “upwardly vocal” minority now living round and about than there were then….:diablo:
And the local council no doubt see it as a prime brown-field site which they could turn into one of the trendy eco-friendly business parks that seem to be popping up everywhere, possibly generating them more business rate revenue, possibly bringing future employment opportunities to the area, but almost certainly boosting their green credentials by getting shot of those noisy, fossil fuel burning, rich boys’ “toys” that upset some of the more well heeled, and thus more influential, local residents.
As has been said, Kemble, North Weald… how long before Duxford and others become targets of similar campaigns, where many agenda(s, ae?) can be cleverly hidden behind a few “complaints about noise”.
Paul F
er…no, move next to an airfield, don’t be surprised to see and hear aircraft – if I moved to Slough could I demand the M4 be closed because of noise?
These days anything seems possible – saw in the Daily Telegruff earlier this week a that a couple had moved out of the big smoke, and bought a twee cottage in a pretty Devon village (IIRC). Their new home is sited across the village green from the village church. They are now seeking to get the church bells silenced from 9:00pm to 7:00am every day, as the noise was disturbing them:mad: 😡 😡 .
Surely they had spotted the Church when the looked around their dream home? Didn’t it occur to them that the church might have bells? If not, then it suggest they didn’t spend much time inspecting their prospective puchase before they bought it….
So, Maple 01 , the old adage of “buyer beware” , and the use of common sense seems to have fallen by the wayside these days…. So why not start a campaign to get the M4 shut between say 9:00pm and 7:00am if it’s disturbing your ZZ’s 😀
Paul F
My boss knows the guy flying the Auster – and is based in Devon. His associates have collected/restored pretty much every mark of Auster. They also have a M-H Broussard.
Sorry, but the name of their airfield has slipped my mind…
Paul F
Sorry, but I can’t make it – I need to get the car window re-fitted, or I risk owning the first Zafira with an in-car swimming pool 🙁 .
Make sure someone posts a few photos of the day.
Paul F
Quite true, although I think Paul F may have been referring to comparing photos on his screen from his DSLR directly to the actual prints from his film SLR?
Paul
To be honest, I’ve never compared like for like 35MM vs DSLR photos taken of same subject in same place at same time. I stepped up to my 350D from my old Canon EOS350 and T70 35mm film cameras via a Fuji S6500 “Pro-sumer” digital with 10x zoom.
As a first digicam the Fuji blew me away with it’s sharp colours and pin sharp images, plus a host of operating modes as well as manual. Sure it had a few limitations but nothign too serious, and it overcame my scepticism that digital wa steh way to go. On the back of my results with the S6500 I took the plunge and moved “up” to the EOS 350D, looking forwad to getting back to using a “real camera” and lenses again, only to find that my images were dissapointing – obviously “soft” and with somewhat muted and dull colours, compared to the Fuji. N.B. I have only ever used the 350D in JPEG mode, never tried RAW mode….must do one day.
Comparing 35mm shots from the older Canon film bodies to shots taken (using the same lenses) on the 350D (JPEG) suggested they were generally far less sharp. I have since realised that D-SLR images require a fair degree of post-processing to get the best image for printing – unlike the Fuji images which simply needed a bit of cropping and maybe a colour balance tweak.
As Skymonster says, and something I did not appreciate before buying the 350D, was/is that DSLR images seem to require a good deal of processing, whereas lower end digitals seem to deliver “ready to print” images. Horses for courses I guess – someone using a DSLR is probably more likely to want to “tinker” with the images before displaying/printing them, whereas users of “lower end” cameras simply want to “snap and print”.
Having had my 350D a year now, I finally feel like I’m starting to get the best out of it, though at times I still prefer the convenience of the Fuji – a 10x zoom with no need to carry seperate lenses round with me, a much smaller piece of kit (albeit not quite pocket sized), bright and sharp images, and an interpolated 6Mp image that easily stands being printed out at A4 with little need to slave over a hot laptop afterwards. On a recent business trip to China I took the Fuji to save space, and had forgotten just what a delight it is to use. That said, having learnt how to work on the 350D images then
Oh, and I think the fact that I’m using a 70 – 210mm Canon zoom lens that came as part of my (35mm) 350 kit didn’t help my first results with my 350D – a budget “kit” lens is never going to produce images as sharp as a decent piece of glassware -and Digital just seems to make it’s limitations more obvious.
Moral of the story – make sure you understand just how much post-production work may be required on the images when you consider buying a DSLR! It’s all very good coming home from a day at a museum or airshow with many hundreds of images on the CF cards, but it may take many more hours to sort and process them fit for viewing/printing/display :eek:.
Paul F
As someone who has no real interest in football per se, here’s a radical thought, how about paying England players (and coaching staff)match fees purely based on results achieved, with a “no win – no fee” approach ………that might stick a rocket up all their backsides :dev2:
Problem is, they all earn far too much from their “day job” contracts anyway, so any England match fees would probably be small change to them, and thus even a win-related pay scheme might not motivate them.
As has been said above, why don’t most England supporters just wake up to the fact that the team is now a second-rate national side, the Glory days of 1966 etc are long gone, and it’s about time everyone woke up to that fact. Croatia simply outplayed England last night, we weren’t “unlucky”, we were simply beaten by a better team. Croatia played like a team, England played like eleven seperate men.
For years my better half has been saying that the problem is that there are so many foreigners playing in the UK premiership that the FA don’t have enough good English players to choose from. At long last the FA seem to be picking up on that idea too – as with most sports, once serious money moved in then the game was ruined – the only reason certain premiership teams have so many foreign players is the greedy pursuit of cash, the fact that they choose to bring so many foreign players in must surely suggest that home grown players are just not up to scratch, and should have been ringing alarm bells at the FA many years ago.
Rather than worry about qualifying for the next major international competition (whatever that is), perhaps FA should look at encouraging grass roots football, so as to help raise a new generation of high quality players, and ensure they comne to fruition by limiting the numbers of overseas players a team can put on the books, and put on the field in any match.
Personally I couldn’t give a monkeys how the team do/did. I just wish the fact that England are out would now mean that next summer’s TV schedules would be “Euro 2008 – free” – a forlorn hope methinks. Instead we’ll be forced to endure a month of “What if..?” scenarios, and all sorts of hypothetical “Well, if we’d qualified, England would have beaten so and so, and be in the knock out/quat=rterfinals/semi final/final” rubbish, while the TV channels desperately try to convince the population that they need to watch the games.
Paul F