dark light

detective

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 93 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: G-FIRE colour still underneath #849245
    detective
    Participant

    …Mark12 .. Do you have or know the precise quote from Spencer Flacks’ comment ?….for the sake of posterity here on the forum, it would be good to round it out and be documented….

    and also please… is she still attending airshows ?.. and when did she last fly ?

    in reply to: G-FIRE colour still underneath #849971
    detective
    Participant

    …just so damn cool to have a civilian scheme applied to a Spitfire, as compared to the others ……

    in reply to: G-FIRE colour still underneath #849981
    detective
    Participant

    `…to my knowledge, when confronted with a heckler who had frowned upon the colour he had chosen, became the very first person to publicly coin the phrase… ” and what colour might your Spitfire be “….(or similar words to that effect)…

    in reply to: The Battle of Britain Film…The best war movies #853057
    detective
    Participant

    Hi Mark12 .. welcome back to the fray….The Battle of Britain film has the benefit of being one of the first “enthusiasts” war movies, and not just popcorn and thrills at a Saturday matinee…. I’ll never forget Michael Cain stating “The engine’s overheating, and so am I” …how typically British and so suited to the feel of the movie.

    …From my perch, Moggy cats are best left to others for dissemination…..

    in reply to: This Quote True or False ? #853207
    detective
    Participant

    The danger in this scenario brings about a fundamental flaw, whereby some un-airworthy airframe items are gifted to various individuals for whatever reason. Someone decides to embark on a full and faithful rebuild to airworthy status, not realising that “Bloggs’ has decided to go down the same road with his gifted/discarded airframe bit.

    … Under this rule they are both entitled to “build” their shiny, new Spitfire, but who has the rights and propriety ??… Assuming that no other aircraft exists with these numbers/serials etc.

    in reply to: RR232 AIR-TO-AIRS from Mark12 #867704
    detective
    Participant

    …what you might call one of the very first “data plate” restorations….God bless Her

    in reply to: Aerojumble for those downunder – This Sat #869320
    detective
    Participant

    ..great stuff Bellarine .. All the best to you and the crew for the next one…..

    in reply to: Seafire 12 Antenna #869915
    detective
    Participant

    …reading up a bit, would agree its probably a Seafire Mk 111. the Vokes Aero Vee intake and four blade prop threw me….

    in reply to: Seafire 12 Antenna #870825
    detective
    Participant

    ..Mark 12 knows the guff….And i think his keyboard finger is itching to write a reply…

    …… gently, gently …..

    …just a late edit .. are we sure this is in fact a Seafire?….I thought they were fitted with the head restraint attached to the seat armour…(and especially in 1945 when the catapults were becoming more exploited ?)…realistically it just looks like a fairly late Mk 9 Spitfire ???

    detective
    Participant

    …..wave the olive branch and get a whack in the face with it for your efforts………JUST UNBELIEVABLE !!!

    detective
    Participant

    …with respect to all contributors to this thread, and hopefully not upsetting the mods any further…. we all know there is a very worthy, viable restoration project being embarked upon to see an otherwise extinct Whitley bomber come back to life and in need of an FN4A or B to help see the job through.

    …i have absolutely no connection with the Whitley project people, and although I feel collecting a very rare item just for the sake of a bit of capitalising later on is OK, it can also appear a bit mean spirited to the “family” here that makes up the forum/restoration crew to have something obviously not needed where it is, but otherwise quite needed elsewhere to see a worthwhile project out to a completion.

    …I extend my apologies to all for the heavy handed first post of mine earlier in the thread….sometimes a bad day or a frustrating niggle can lead to a somewhat ill considered outburst……Cheers to All

    detective
    Participant

    …I feel I have become incensed by the ongoing reevers/digger/daniel/liberator saga which seems to only inflame people and responses….

    …It’s time these people outed themselves as being mere collectors….opportunistic folly with very little “fruit” bearing from their exhortations !!!

    in reply to: Pubs that were airmen's off-duty refuges in World War 2 #878859
    detective
    Participant

    …being a purveyor of a lovely drop of ink….can we include the inevitable officers mess ?….(or even the sergeants)… to make up a good place to enjoy a pint of your favourite from way back in the day ?…..

    ….. there still are a few mess’s to sign the visitors book what…..??

    detective
    Participant

    The word appears to be “serviced” Parafield aerodrome with the date looking a little inconclusive.

    detective
    Participant

    …the “VIA” part of the riddle I take literally as being “Victorian and Interstate Airways”…..unit number 3 ??

    …also appears to be a lot of trainer yellow showing through….

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 93 total)