dark light

Lonevolk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 635 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1796880
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Taran System: A 1960s NMD project

    http://military.tomsk.ru/blog/index-379.html

    Interesting

    Yeah, the Pantsir comment was very interesting. Very sad of them to spin the induction of the same 10 Pantsir’s they’ve had for 2 years now as something new.

    I wonder whether the next Pantsir batch will be mounted on Baz instead of Kamaz trucks. It would be make sense if they’re going to be paired with the S-400 units

    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc17/th_189042954_DSC_0480_1_1_122_17lo.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2369224
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Huh? Lower is *better* in that chart! It shows cruise fuel consumption in grams per ton of cargo and kilometre travelled.

    You’re right…I stuffed up the translation on that one

    What Snow Monkey said. Make it clear to the Ukrainian suppliers in their contracts that they either get their act together or production of the parts in question will move to Russia (and they lose their business completely). Isn’t that pretty much exactly what Russia has done to TAPO with the Il-476?

    The president of “Motor Sich” seems confident that wider Russo-Ukr. cooperation in aviation is inevitable

    http://vpk.name/news/56248_rossiya_i_ukraina_na_edinom_kryile_v_budushee.html

    ______________________________

    Speaking of transport planes, 2 old An-22 are undergoing overhaul at Ivanovo currently

    (April 2011)
    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc358/th_187706422_050772_122_358lo.jpg

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2369499
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    http://armstass.su/?page=article&aid=97871&cid=25

    1 PAK-FA will definitely fly at MAKS, and both might, but you wont be able to get too close to either one on the ground. You will only be able to take pics at a considerable distance.

    There’s a bit more info in the following article

    …..According to “Izvestia”, on Max, which will open on August 16 in Zhukovsky near Moscow, will be attended by two flying prototypes T-50. On one of them chief Sukhoi test pilot Sergei Bogdan will perform special summer program that demonstrates the characteristics of the aircraft.

    However, in the words of the pilot, the first public flying of the aircraft will be limited.

    – T-50 still being tested, so it is restricted. I will perform complicated aerobatics at low altitudes with overloads of up to 5 g and the allowable angles of attack, without a demonstration of the aircraft’s super maneuverability, – said Bogdan for “Izvestia”.

    After a few singles flights there are plans to lift into the air both T-50 prototypes. The next day they will be joined by the the other Russian fighter jet in the final tests – the Su-35.

    It is noteworthy that the possibilities of modern Russian fighter pilots will demonstrate in front of the “potential enemy” – U.S. Air Force pilots. The Air Show will be attended by 12 American warplanes – F-15E fighters and F-16C, B-52 bomber, a military transport plane C-130J.

    The T-50 rival- fifth-generation fighter F-22 “Raptor” – the Americans decided not to bring to Russia, limiting the flight program to the F-15. The Russian aviation industry reps believe the Americans are reluctant to exhibit their stealth technology in Russia but will participate at MAKS with the intention to look at the new Russian aircraft.

    However, to study the T-50 the Americans won’t be allowed.

    – The aircraft is “classified.” Therefore, it’s demonstration on the ground will be conducted within a closed exhibition program, which will not allow Americans. They, as well as ordinary visitors will be able to see only fighter in the demonstration flights, – the “Izvestia” a source in the UAC said…..

    http://www.izvestia.ru/news/497112

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2369521
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    It only has longer range because it carries twice as much fuel, and since it does not fly twice as far, fuel efficiency is worse, pound for pound……

    According to the comparison chart I posted earlier, which BTW is from some Antonov promotional pamphlet, the Il-76MD has better better fuel efficiency

    4th chart: fuel efficiency with max cargo
    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=495943995_An70_comparison_122_222lo.jpg

    The other problem with the An-70 from a Russian perspective is not just Ukraine’s political allegiance but it’s production capability. There are reports that the An-148 production is suffering due to the inability of the Ukrainian plants to keep up with production plans. The Ukrainians are only starting to talk about upgrading their production facilities, a process which will probably take some time to put into practice.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2369837
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Not that bloody Il-476 again – it’s disappointing enough as an airlifter and now they’re trying to use it for missions to which it is even more ill suited (and where, yet again, superior as well as more mature alternatives exist).

    It’s got longer range and is more fuel efficient than your pet An-70……although there’s an outside chance that the An-124 will be used as a platform for the A-100.

    ______________________

    First Russian strike UAV to be showcased at Moscow air show

    Lutch, Russia’s first unmanned air vehicle (UAV) designed to carry out air strikes, will be shown at the Moscow air show next week, according to its producer, Vega.

    “Vega will show a full-scale mock-up of the Lutch medium-range UAV at MAKS 2011,” a Vega representative said.

    “Lutch is designed for optical reconnaissance, radar, radio-relay and electronic reconnaissance missions,” he added.

    Lutch can also carry guided weapons on fuselage pylons or in a fuselage weapons bay.

    “Up to 150-170 kilograms of ammunition and weapons control systems can be carried,” Vega said.

    Based on the Sigma 5 piloted aircraft, Lutch has a 250-350-kilometer surveillance range, which can be augmented to 500 kilometers, and an endurance of no less than 18 hours, which can be increased with extra fuel supplies to 30 hours.

    With 800 kilograms of maximum take-off weight (MTOW) it flies at speeds of up to 270 kilometers per hour.

    http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20110810/165683626.html

    Lutch
    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc17/024390831_414888638_122_17lo.jpg

    For reference a video about the Sigma-5 ultralight plane on which it’s based

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xPZ5i9Hrcg

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2370593
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Just occurred to me, I had in mind the D-30F-6 variant for the MiG-31. It may be out of production?

    Probably only in small batches to keep the Mig-31’s going. There was a report a few years ago that some of the solutions used for the PS-90 were being implemented for the D-30 production.

    It’s still listed in the manufacturer’s website
    http://www.avid.ru/products/military/d-30f6/

    ________________________________

    Rare pic of the 23D2 prototype (Ka-31 for ground surveillance)

    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc406/th_756885849_Ka_31.23D2_122_406lo.jpg

    It’s a further development of the naval Ka-31 with a new L381 radar…

    http://topwar.ru/5981-redkiy-snimok-pervogo-prototipa-vertoleta-23d2.html

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2372055
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Should be interesting if confirmed….

    Russia’s Sukhoi aircraft maker will demonstrate in flight two prototypes of its T-50 fifth-generation fighter, also known as PAK-FA, to the general public for the first time.

    http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20110802/165511178.html

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372917
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Exceptional pics…

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1796993
    Lonevolk
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372938
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    I can almost guarantee that any export sales of the Il-476 will be due to either one of two things:

    1. Inadequate funding of the An-70 programme, further delaying service entry and fixing of any glitches that might crop up….

    You’re obviously a An-70 fan 🙂

    The An-70 apparently did have it’s share of problems and I’m assuming they’ve sorted them out in the last 10 years. I had a interesting online exchange with a ex-member of a government committee who claims the An-70 was initially (late 90’s) rejected by Russia on the grounds that it had inferior reliability and STOL performance compared to the Il-76.

    Speaking of STOL performance and Il-76-C-17 comparison, the C-17 cannot land on rough unprepared airfields, marketing claims not withstanding.

    ________________________________

    Some news….

    The vice-president “Irkut” expects to sign an order for 65 x YAK-130’s during MAKS 2011…he also says the 16 Algerian 130’s will be handed over by the end of the year.

    http://www.armstrade.org/includes/periodics/news/2011/0726/14408996/detail.shtml

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2373981
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    It wasn’t a price comparison.
    Why has the C-17 has actually outsold the Il-76 anyway?

    Not for long I suspect.

    And what about the C-17?…..it’s an over-hyped and overpriced piece of equipment for suckers with money to burn.

    The An-70’s most direct counterpart is the A-400

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2374221
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Something interesting…

    An-70 (in red) comparison with it’s competitors:

    A-400M (light blue/gray)
    Il-76MD (gold)
    C-130J (yellow)

    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc222/th_495943995_An70_comparison_122_222lo.jpg

    The top drawings are self explanatory. The charts are for:

    (left to right)

    1. Max. load
    2. Carrying capacity (soldiers, weapons) in percentages ?? (I’m not sure about proper translation)
    3. Cruising speed to achieve max range
    4. Fuel efficiency with max load

    ______________________

    An older video from 2000

    An-70 stall tests
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdqMHJJDiFM

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2374331
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Excellent! Now they need to go one better and stop throwing good money after bad on the useless Il-476 😀

    They need both of them.

    The An-70 to replace the An-12 and the 476 to update the Il-76 fleet.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2374825
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Russian Black Sea AVMF set to receive 12 Su-30SM.
    http://lenta.ru/news/2011/07/20/su30sm/

    Upgraded Su-24’s by the end of July and later on Backfires to return as part of the BSF aviation, according to the chief of naval aviation, Major-General Alexander Otroshchenko

    http://www.mda.ru/article/18702

    _____________________________

    Yak-130 and Su-30 at Irkutsk aviation plant

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/38816.html

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2375264
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    It’s not a weapon, It’s an experimental UAV. From TRDI website:

    “[I]Unmanned Aircraft Research System

    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc105/044411220_81225_122_105lo.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 635 total)