dark light

Lonevolk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 635 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Avalon Airshow review 2011. #2324660
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Nice photos. Thanks.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2009299
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    BAL-E test footage (2004)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIKbmgmeiro

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2324661
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    I don’t think this was mentioned yet…

    There are reports on Russian forums from a ‘reliable’ source that T-50-2 has carried out 4 flights between the 3rd and 5th of March.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2333753
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    ….apart of blocker, T-50 inlet is a piece of art – for those who understands

    a little teaser while we are waiting for 50-2 maiden flight…

    Thanks for sharing. Very interesting.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2336483
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Now long term plans are usualy pretty hard to judge for accuracy, but!
    http://www.lenta.ru/news/2011/02/24/buy/

    100 helicopters in 2011! I would like to see a breakdown.

    “Russian Helicopters” published it’s current orders recently. They reportedly have up to 2013 to deliver.

    Mi-8 -> 182

    Mi-26 -> 1

    Mi-28N -> 59
    Ka-52 -> 27
    Mi-35M -> 30

    Ka-27/31/32 -> 38
    Ka-226 -> 6
    Ansat-U -> 30

    Direct from the ‘horses mouth’ – the VVS !! :diablo:

    Sorry – I’ll get my coat :rolleyes:

    Ken

    Free advertising for the BBC (the corporation)

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2337761
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    MiG-31BM (via http://forums.airforce.ru/)
    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc397/th_13912_MiG_31BM_01_a_122_397lo.jpg http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc62/th_13915_MiG_31BM_05_122_62lo.jpg

    I think this is the first pic of No: 05

    in reply to: One F-117 downed , second F-117 damaged ? #2337766
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    and serious damage to the own infrastructure in the meanwhile. 😉

    I agree, because in 3 months they sure didn’t do serious damage to the military….I wonder why 😉

    in reply to: One F-117 downed , second F-117 damaged ? #2338343
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    Once the target is acquired the Low Blow is switched into tracking mode, using the UV-10 antenna to transmit, the UV-10 to receive for ranging, and the scanning UV-11 chevron receive antennas for angle tracking. The radar head is mechanically steered in azimuth and elevation to maintain track.

    Basically a detailed description of the same procedure mentioned earlier.

    For visual reference…

    SNR-125
    http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Engagement-Fire-Control.html#mozTocId687041

    The radio signal logs of unit 250/3. contain two further proximity fuse activation pings beyond the F-117 and F-16 shootdown events, indicating that either extra NATO aircraft were hit or ALE-50 towed jammer devices were destroyed by the missiles, as opposed to the SAM missiles simply missing due to radar jamming or chaff dispersal.

    Personally I think the towed jammer theory is the most likely explanation for the B-2 claim

    in reply to: One F-117 downed , second F-117 damaged ? #2339117
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    The problem is, the metric-wave P-18 can not give the height information in the way claimed.

    I didn’t just invent that you know.

    That’s what a former radar operator reports and I have no reason to doubt him.

    The Serbs had upgraded their SA-3s with TV systems enabling command guidance without the use of radar.

    No TV system was added until after the war

    in reply to: One F-117 downed , second F-117 damaged ? #2339204
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    None claimed that, when you give an idea from that forum how that height finding problem could have been solved.

    I don’t quite understand. What do you mean?

    That’s the described procedure that was used when they didn’t have the height.

    What radar (P-**) was used in that way? 10 degree is a lot of guessing the distances in mind. The former GDR people did something similar with their ** to have a height guess at least. 😉

    We’re talking about the P-18

    in reply to: One F-117 downed , second F-117 damaged ? #2339254
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    2 were hit.

    The point is they had to fly accompanied by jamming aircraft just like other strike aircraft because once detected the F-117 is actually more vulnerable than other aircraft.

    in reply to: One F-117 downed , second F-117 damaged ? #2339261
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    On the B-2 incident.

    To this day (over 10 yrs later) Zoltan and his crew insist that they hit a B-2, however impossible it may sound.

    The incident took place on the 20th of May 1999 at 00:11 hrs. 2 missiles were fired from fire position “Bechmen-3” on a target (azimuth 180 deg – distance 13 km).

    …….

    Earlier we spoke about how the F-117 would’ve been engaged without the aid of a height finder. Here’s a brief description:

    After the detection of a target, the officer in charge of the missile guidance starts a manual search for the target at the given azimuth and range. The radar antenna is moved left-right and vertically in 10 degree sequences. Once the target is found it’s placed on the vertical-horizontal marker and passed onto the missile operators for manual tracking.

    Although this a more time consuming procedure, experienced crews could carry it out relatively quickly during the war.

    After the first successful detection of a stealth target, the appearance, strength and unique fluctuation of the signal on the radar screen were known. A special code was assigned and was passed on to other units.

    The 450th SAM Regiment based near the town of Kraljevo, south from the 125th Brigade, also detected stealth targets on several occasions but was not in a position to engage.

    Source: http://www.mycity-military.com/ forum.

    ……

    So in conclusion, to suggest that the F-117 shootdown was a fluke or that other stealth targets could not have been targeted is ridiculous!

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2340070
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    How many MiG-31BM already operate?

    There’s no official figures that I’m aware of.

    In 2010, the Sokol plant released a statement that the first batch (squadron?) was completed and going by spotter reports probably the second batch is currently being released.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2340184
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    … but can anyone help me out, what are the xternal differences of a standard MiG-31 and the updated BM ???

    The sat. antenna + wing pylons for R-73/R-77
    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc244/th_47533_31000_122_244lo.jpg http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc484/th_47535_3160_122_484lo.jpg

    One more confirmed BM, No: 18

    http://img3067.imagevenue.com/loc546/th_47681_MiG_31BM_18_Red_122_546lo.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798596
    Lonevolk
    Participant

    40N6 state-tests ended last year. I don’t know if the 2 last units were supplied with 40N6 or with “old” 48N6DM…….

    Interesting.

    It seems the 3rd Regiment is destined for the Far East, Kamchatka to be more specific.

    http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/02/18/44970963.html

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 635 total)