dark light
Airliner World
Combat Aircraft
AeroPlane
Flypast
Airforces
Aviation
Pcpilot
Air

Erwinhans

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 25, 2010 at 10:48 am in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2340840
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Pinko;1680110]Wow, Hans got it 1st

    The engines?

    AL-31,sure

    December 25, 2010 at 9:48 am in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2340861
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    I agree with You to be sceptical … but I see at least something, that is – not only IMO – not PSed nor anything that has been seen in China before … in addition to several eye-witness repors from some reliable “sources” (including actually the one who posed the first J-10B pictures) I think it’s save to say that there is something going on.

    If You or some others prefer to belive that China still can only copy Russian types … then that’s up to You.

    Cheers and merry Christmas.
    Deino

    Nothing was showed in that pic.

    But what about this?

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=191155&stc=1&thumb=1&d=1293270492

    December 24, 2010 at 8:36 am in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2341537
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Like I said before … some really don’t want to see

    So,what you saw?

    December 24, 2010 at 7:12 am in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2341544
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    He-he-he 🙂 What is it? Looks like … smudge 😀

    This recalled me some stuff.

    Can you remeber one of T-50 early desigh?

    August 30, 2010 at 5:10 am in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2417157
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    bTW. what is underneath the cockpit canopy? 😮

    Man,this is a CG made by GaoShan only…

    August 20, 2010 at 10:44 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421250
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    I know this,but one problem is most radar max detection range is not TWS/RWS,but VS mode…

    August 20, 2010 at 4:08 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421354
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    And I found stuff sources

    It shows Su-27SM use N001VE(P) “Peo” or “Pero” Radar.

    Pero was planed to be used in Su-30MKK3.

    Looks better than normal N001V/VE

    And Carlo Kopp said N001VE “Pero”is Speace feed PESA…

    August 20, 2010 at 4:05 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421356
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Дальность захвата истребителя, не менее, км:

    This is closer to track range not detection range.:)

    August 20, 2010 at 3:48 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421360
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Check the link I posted. It’s 99.99% the Sukhoi, larger Bars.

    Hmmmm…what I saw is a N001VE…

    August 20, 2010 at 2:25 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421377
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Where is that from?

    NIIP website gives less air targets attacked…

    Military stuff export handbook.

    NIIP website gives might be Bars-29?

    August 20, 2010 at 2:09 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421383
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Well there are at least some figures out there about both radars:
    N001V/N-011M:
    detection range against fighter: 130-140 km/160+ km
    tracking: 10/15
    Engagement: 1-2/4
    Azimuth coverage: +/-60°/+/-70+°
    Elevation coverage: +/-55° both
    NCTR: No/Yes

    That’s certainly just a fraction of everything relevant, but anyway one don’t need to be an expert to know that an upgraded variant of a 1980s radar with inferior technology base is unlikely to match a 1990s radr from the same manufacturer with more advanced technologies.

    Nice!

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=187803&stc=1&d=1282266551

    August 19, 2010 at 8:38 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421844
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    The Bars can attack 4 targets – this isn’t anything amazing (an ideal number, actually, in my mind). I don’t think this is hard to match, probably more related to processing, and the Su-27SM has brand new hardware for that.

    Nope, Bars can attack 8.

    And PESA/AESA is sightly better than PD radar in muti-target attack.

    August 19, 2010 at 8:09 am in reply to: Unknow small aircarft crashed in China #2421850
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Out of fuel,looks no damage

    August 19, 2010 at 8:06 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421853
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    It’s been going along since the mid 2000s, since funding was available. All this talk now is because there’s so much more to modernize, given the fact that the RuAF is MASSIVE. Far more massive than the IAF. Your view of things is rather biased, blatantly and deliberately.

    Oh please. You can’t prove a thing – whether it me being wrong, or you being right. :rolleyes:

    Apparently, the RuAF version of the N001V has some “special” functions that have not been revealed – a similar claim as to the new NIIP AESA for the PAK-FA.
    The former could well be considered an APG-70 on steroids.

    I know this,but it is just a little better than N001VE.

    And it can’t be better than Bars in Muiti-aircraft attack and some more.

    August 19, 2010 at 4:42 am in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421883
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Su-27SM use N001VEP,it is as good as N001VE for Su-30MKK/MKK2 or littile better.

    And N001VEP can’t be better than Bars

    But Su-27SM have AL-31FM1 and new FBW.

    So,T/W and Wingloading of Su-27SM is sightly better than Su-30MKI

    But the problem is Su-30MKI have TVC

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)
1 2 3