dark light

Erwinhans

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2421894
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    This is more likely for me.:D

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=187791&stc=1&d=1282188226

    And Su-27SM can use any weapon for Su-30MKK,maybe 30MKK2 too.

    By the way,J-11B can not use (at least no pic) any A/G weapon till now.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2422463
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    and who said that?

    looks alot like the flying sword ucav model but fighterized
    I say China’s stealth fighter will fly in 2012 and will not have canards and will have DSI.

    No,man,you got a big mistake

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2422466
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    No Zhuk-MS is an upscaled Zhuk-M compatible with the Flanker still using a slotted array. The PESA variant is Zhuk-MF/MFS.

    Small overview about the letters:
    M = Modernised
    E = Export
    S = Scaled up variant for the Flanker family
    F = PESA variant
    A = AESA variant

    Zhuk-AE is the AESA export variant for the Fulcrum for example. Zhuk-ME the modernised slotted array export variant of the Zhuk. Zhuk-MFS is a scalled up PESA variant of the radar for the Flanker family etc.

    By the way.

    AESA=АФАР,PD=ФАР PESA=ПФАР(Not sure about PESA,not it is not Ф IIRC)

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2423564
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Man,J-11B was never a tiger……..

    Some unknow reports made it a tiger…

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2423587
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Su-35BM > Su-30MKA/MKM > Su-30MKI > J-11B

    It is : Su-35BM > Su-30MKA/MKM > Su-30MKI > Su-27SM>J-11B

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2424180
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Maybe you are right,but J-11B have no Zhuk-M…

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2424445
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Zhuk-MS is PESA and above stuff is sightly PD radar.

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2424450
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    No…N001VE is a little better or as good as above stuff while VS air targets

    And N001VE is much better than this stuff while VS ground targets

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2424627
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    [QUOTE=talltower;1624274]

    The Su-35BM uses an Irbis-E PESA radar set, while the J-11B uses a Type 1474 AESA. The maximum range of the latter is unknown, but both radars offer comparable performance to the APG-77 series, used in the F-22.

    Do you think this is a AESA radar?

    This stuff is no better than N001VE.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=187636&stc=1&d=1281695733

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2424782
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Do Chinese actually use mission-specific variant suffixes, except for the G? I’ve never seen them, only sequential ones (J-6IV, J-7E) or sometimes specific ones for export customers (F-7P). The one mission-specific variant suffix I know with Chinese designations is Z for recce, as in the JZ-8.

    A further development of the J-11B would likely be J-11C. A -G suffix doesn’t make sense since it only seems to be applied to export aircraft, which is out of the question for the J-11.

    Sightly not,excpet J-8HH , last H for navy.

    Yes F-7P/PG is export and G also doesn’t mean anything. Like J-8G/J-7G

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2424784
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Please be reminded that in Chinese based abbreviations, “M” does not mean Modification, or Upgrade, as they do with the Russians, rather the abbreviations are based on Chinese words, and in this case, “M” would mean “Export”.

    Thus J-11BM would mean J-11B for Export, which currently won’t be happening without Russian complaint.

    “G” as in “Gai” would mean Improved. So an improved J-11B would be J-11BG. However, if an all new letter is used, like J-11C, then its a further modified scale where J-11C > J-11BG.

    The use of successive letters (A and above) would mean improved variants except for reserved letters:

    G = Gai for Improved.
    F = Air Defense, meaning specialized interceptor with long range missiles.
    S = Two Seater
    H = Two meanings, either for Bomber or Strike, or for Naval Use.
    M = Export

    Man,some small mistake.

    F doesen’t mean any thing,just 6th version.If you know J-7FS..

    H = Bomber if it is H-XXX and H = nothing while it is X-XHX and H= navy while it is X-XXH

    Like H-6D J-8H J-7HH

    😉

    in reply to: the MiG-15 and MiG-15UTI in China #2371364
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    Man.Z-5 and Q-5 is Inertia:D

    五(5) VS 无(no) is sightly different…

    in reply to: the MiG-15 and MiG-15UTI in China #2373410
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    There is one saying that Chinese start the designation of their 1st indigenously made plane in its class with “ 5” : to be H-5: 1st gen of bomber in PLAAF service or Q-5, 1st attacker , Z-5 the 1st helicopter or Y-5 and J-5 the 1st fighter. Because 5 pronounced in Chinese is close to the meaning of “None” in Chinese, which means everything starts from “none”. A belief 1st documented some near 3 thousand years ago by an ancient Chinese philosopher-Lao Tzu. Modern physician Niels Bohr certainly adopted this thought when he found his “model of atom” comes to the dead end, and he refered to the Lao tzu’s thought as the last explanation .;)

    To the other Q, Chinese just modified the existing Mig-15 to trainer themselves but not made them so it there no У ΜиГ-15 trainer made in China.

    One saying is there are total up to 1460 Mig-15s imported from/given by USSR to China in 1950s. no one is made in China, because the starting licensed copy is Mig-17, which is designated J-5 and made in China.

    No,man…we use 5,just because most of this aircrafts was started in our first 5 years plan…

    in reply to: Beauty Contest: T-50 vs F-22, -35 etc #2387936
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    From cetain angles, T-50 looks magnificent!

    I agree,nice one!

    in reply to: MiG-19 Farmer #2403081
    Erwinhans
    Participant

    So I’m actually currently reading the Squadron/Signal book on the MiG-19 and its a very interesting read thus far. Just a quick recap to see where my knowledge stands. I’m just going off memory so please correct me on where I may be wrong. The following just applies to Soviet variants:

    MiG-19 Farmer-A: first production version – short vertical fin, two-piece horizontal stab four underwing hardpoints, three NR-23 cannons.

    MiG-19P Farmer-B: first radar-equipped version – short vertical fin, two-piece horizontal stab, four hardpoints (R-3S Atoll capability on some airframes), two NR-23 cannons.

    MiG-19PG Farmer-B: fitted with datalink (similar to US SAGE system perhaps?)

    MiG-19S Farmer-C: main production day fighter, longer vertical fin, one-piece horizontal stab, four hardpoints, three NR-30 cannons.

    MiG-19SF Farmer-C: uprated RD-9 engines.

    MiG-19SV Farmer-C: lightened high-altitude version of the Farmer-C.

    MiG-19PM Farmer-E: enhanced Izumrud radar with four RS-2U (or RS-2US perhaps?) Alkali missiles, one-piece stab (?), larger vertical fin (?)

    Am I missing any variants?

    (Note that I’m not including prototypes and experimental versions.)

    Peter G

    posted in #37

    AFAIK same as MIG-19P installation, additional HP were added outboard of the main ones.

    MiG-19P:
    http://www.sanko.wroclaw.pl/apt/mig-…MiG-19P-23.jpg

    I take back the MiG-19SF standard with R-3S comment. North Vietnamese MiG-19SF were later added with R-3S, as were Egyptian MiG-19S..

    http://www.sanko.wroclaw.pl/apt/mig-19/roz/MiG-19P-23.jpg

    My point: this is a MiG-19PT

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)