dark light

Siddar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 227 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2143494
    Siddar
    Participant

    The failure to upgrade all F35 to modern standard is boon given to Russia and China by the US congress. They can’t seem to pass a budget are anything much at all. That leaves the pentagon budget stuck using 2016 budget as a stop gap until the congress gets its act together. That is has a lot of consequences for programs including F35.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2145427
    Siddar
    Participant

    Qatar is showing the downside of multipolar world.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2149084
    Siddar
    Participant

    [qoute]I think that the drastic price reduction in PGMs which allowed for not only more munitions to be carried (ie SDB, APKWS, etc) but reduced the number of sorties required to complete a mission played a much greater role than the collateral damage issue. In addition, most modern PGMs could be made in kit form and they be customized to the mission rather than a purpose-built PGM.[/quote]

    I don’t think PGM got cheaper. It’s more of case of Aircraft got more expensive and JDAM made 24 hour all weather PGM delivery viable. Up until JDAM many airforces simply said radar guided ground bombing with dumb bombs was good enough.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2150450
    Siddar
    Participant

    Any talk of Rafale or Typhoon in relation to this Germeny/France joint project is pointless. The main reason for replacing Tornado is to keep capability of German nuclear determent by use NATO nuclear stockpile viable. The F35 is clearly the best option for that and Rafale or Typhoon would come in a distant second third to it in that role. The facts are if this project goes forward them MLU upgrades for both Rafale and Typhoon will become harder to fund. Making relying on ether of those platform being able to do the required strike mission questionable in long term. Given the likely end result will be a high cost fighter that will tuned for the primary role of air superiority by default in order to justify it high cost versus F35. It leaves room for German F35 buy. If Germans will take the most sensible route here is really the only question.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2153342
    Siddar
    Participant

    For Dassault to have the lead in the project. It would require them to have the lead in low observable aircraft. When compared to Germany. I doubt that is case the Germans have dabbled in low observable sense it’s beginning.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2153840
    Siddar
    Participant

    Tiger and NH90 were failures based upon their lack of exports. Promised exports were why those projects were approved.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2155095
    Siddar
    Participant

    What?! The threat to the of future EU come from France and Italy leaving. Turkey is nether a threat to EU are somehow more of a US ally than a EU one. Egypt and Russia are opposing EU influence established by force in Libya. Maybe EU should have considered that before it decided to make a mess of Libya in the first place. Yea the Germans have the bad habit of offending potential customers of their exports. That’s a German problem not an EU one. Your right about China it will soon be ahead of europe in fight design. It’s only to late for a fifth gen aircraft. The potential for europe pulling together and making a sixth gen aircraft has potential.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2157231
    Siddar
    Participant

    Well France does that’s for sure.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2160894
    Siddar
    Participant

    You mean a leopard II replacement? Ask US if they think Germans were a good partner for tank replacement. Then ask UK if they think Germans are were good partners on the eurofighter.

    The best use of Germans on any projects is technical competence. Leave the leadership to those that care about military utility foremost. Hint it isn’t the Germans.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2160982
    Siddar
    Participant

    Saying the Rafale doesn’t need replacing tell 2050. Mostly comes down to starting replacement program 2030 instead 2020. It’s largely a play for time to get more Rafale sales. In the longterm it’s irrelevant to the longterm military ability of EU if France replaces Rafale in the 2050 time frame or 2035 time frame. The economic consideration of program supporting French capability versus one supporting EU as whole is the choice that has made. Well it appears to have been to be made already.

    in reply to: The future of Austrian fighter fleet #2162169
    Siddar
    Participant

    This thread makes me sad. Seeing a country that is able to afford modern equipment for it airforce. Instead be force to look for second hand aircraft.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2162588
    Siddar
    Participant

    It appears as though the new French President is willing to let Dassault go away. First as a prime and eventually all together. It will be a interesting negotiation to watch unfold. The French President seem consumed with a arrogance that doesn’t match the French situation at all.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2164508
    Siddar
    Participant

    And powered flight at the end of engagement that is where meteor gains its increase in no escape zone. Not from total range as compared to amraam. But by meteor having powered flight at the end of a engagement. It’s not something the amraam has the ability to match or close no matter what version of it we are talking about.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2169072
    Siddar
    Participant

    What a strange report with no mention of civilian contractor responsible for the delay.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2183637
    Siddar
    Participant

    What does Turkey have to do with Europe? Turkey has made its choice and were seeing the end of the relationship Europe as result. Turkey may feel it has leverage over Europe. But it is only temporary as soon as Europe figures out that Turkey has shifted in policy it will eventually change its position in regards to Turkey. Turkey has shifted course faster then Europe. Once Europe changes course as response to changes by Turkey all Turkeys leverage will disappear.

    That will be both a loss for Europe and Turkey. Just as it was with Europe and Russia. But in both cases it was the decisions made by their countries leadership to oppose Europe that led to situation.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 227 total)