I did say i’d ignore the rest of this however against my better judgement..

I’m presuming you are Russian.

Nope, that shows you fallow thhe crowd “Political-Correct” for you to think I’m Russkie because I speak for Russian policies shows me you ain’t no intelectual no matter how you type your posts.

On the subject of Chechnya have you checked with ethnic Chechans if they want to be part of Russia?

They lost that chance in 1853 when they were told to stop looting Russian merchants, if you want to get technical in that aspect, did you ask the “Native-Americans” if they wanted to be part of America?

Or was there another reason for the destruction of the Country?

Yes they wanted independance, Rus said no, U.S.A./England want oil-pipelines built through there and there you have it.

Afghanistan, puppet commie government installed by USSR, see Eastern Europe years 1945 – 1989. Detested by the populance hence civil war, the people wanted rid of the puppet commie government.

I’m not disagreeing here so what’s your point?

Georgia very stupidly reacted to Russian and whatever the breakaway bit is called provocation and attempted to re-occupy the breakaway bit, note that that is not Russia it is a breakaway bit of Georgia.
Russia which had shoved loads of troops and kit into the breakaway bit, then spanked Georgia; pray tell exactly where the threat to Russia was?
Russia wanted to throw it’s weight around and pretend it was still the school bully (you’d know all about them..) and Georgia stupidly gave them the chance to do it.

S.O. Abkahzi broke away from Georgia in the 90’s for thier own political reasons, war broke out in late 91, and in 92 Georgia accepted a ceasefire with peacekeeping forces from Georgia/Rus/Occetians in November of 92, so in 08 it was Georgia that broke the ceasefire and got what it deserved, if Serbia went back into Bosnia you would be supporting a NATO strike on Serbia,but now that it’s Georgia (anti-Rus pro-west State) which did the “provication” you want to act as if Rus started this, little kid you can’t play mind games with me I know history NOT YOU.

As an aside i note you don’t address the forceful occupation of Eastern Europe for 50 or so years, perchance that is a fact that even you can’t deny?

The subject here was not about what the Sov Gov did in the past, so you lost the argument on that one, not impressed at all with your socalled lecturing.:D

And in what form will this awakening come? Are you willing to put you total (delusional) dominance of the world to the test? Is Medvedev or his puppet master planning a new world order? Or are you going to cut off our Vodka and Caviar?

Now me, I was actually only born around the time the wall came down so i’ve had to research it, but from the sounds of things, the entire ideas behind the USSR unravelled and it the years afterwards it became obvious why. The most similar situation to that which the USSR was in which I can think of today would be North Korea.

Then your pretty wrong, Russia became what N.Korea is now in the 1990’s things are way better now than then, anyone who says other wise is a LIAR.

Yes Russia started the war. Georgia was fighting breakaway Ossetians and Abkhazians (part of Georgia never part of Russia) an internal matter and Russia sent troops in “out of concern of ethic Russians living in the region and to protect the fledging independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia” which nobody but Russia recognized.

What drugs are you on, Georgia attacked a nation that Rus peacekeeps, and Russia troops were attacked so Gergia got what’s coming to them, your the type who believes the official NATO (Liars) story.:D:D

The GBI missile has a single Exo Atmospheric Kill Vehicle EKV, its only any use against 1 missile. If any of those missiles have a MIRV capability then forget the GBI offering any kind of defence! As I said you don’t even need MIRV to defeat it just lots of missiles … I think Russia has quite a few missiles;)

My point was all Iran has to do is make MORE missiles its actually an incentive for proliferation! For that matter Iran has a MISSILE PROGRAM meaning they are developing a more advance capability over time and at some time maybe even a MIRV capability. Even if the GBI missiles had 10 EKV each and they all worked properly Iran only needs to make 101 missiles to defeat them.

If the U.S. wants to stop Irainian missile strikes the best place for them is Afgahnistan, Not Poland/Cezh, any bafoon can relise this.

The best deterrant has always been MAD ie the threat of overwhelming counter strike.

Both Rus/U.S. NEVER believed in M.A.D. it was created to calm the public down about a nuke war ever happening.

As for Russia, it has no technical fear of the system! its to do with Russian paranoia about encirclement and America operating its percieved sphere of influence…

Why has aNATO gotten bigger if thats the case??:rolleyes:

Canceling the GBI deployment in Eastern Europe was entirely sensible, it never worked properly in the first place.

Also 10 missiles were comical anyway, Iran woud of had to do is build 20 missiles making the system next to useless.

Those 10 missiles would have 10 warheards (Mirvs) on them after a couple of years, thats why Russia doesn’t want them there, even though they already have the advantage in SAM/ABM defences.

Well if your ok with being Russia’s beeotch, fine by me.

Your not a Ceasar, or a War-Mongering tough guy, your just a long line of dumb yanks, that have picked on countries that don’t the weapons capability to fight back, the day when Rus and AMERICA ARE GIONG TO FIGHT are coming to head, and I want to see the look on YOUR face when your nationand millions of your countrymen become ash what are going to do then (so called warmongering tough guy) you get no points for defeating weak nations that can’t fight back anyway.:D:D:cool:

Surrender.

First the F-22 Cancellation and now this.

An entirely predictable move, and consistent with his overall policy of appeasement.

Lets see now if the Russians and other adversaries immediately stop building new weapon systems.

I wonder if he has ever heard of Neville Chamberlain?

This is all for the long 40 year plus old preperation for the destruction of U.S.A. in WW3.

This is no small signal. STRATFOR has watched and noted as Russian ballistic missile submarine patrols have been on the rise. Despite what was essentially a halt to nuclear submarine operations in the wake of the 2000 Kursk tragedy as well as a fatal mishap last year aboard the Nerpa (K-152, also of the Akula class), Russia’s attack submarine fleet now appears to be rebounding. And it is these sorts of longer deployments — demonstrating a greater endurance and returning submarine crews to a higher and more strenuous operational tempo — that could all begin to have a meaningful impact on the proficiency and ethos of the Russian submariner corps.[/QUOTE]
I DON’T BELIEVE THIS CRAP the U.S.N. said the same thing when the Su-24/27’s flew over thier Carriers, his is just “face saving” hahahaha!!!![quote]