dark light

raids13

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 392 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Future of LCA #2615783
    raids13
    Participant

    Thanks a lot Sameer. that surely helps. i would be good though if we actually did contribute to the PAK FA. Lot to learn there for our industry. Thanks again

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615818
    raids13
    Participant

    I agree that M2k-5 is a very potent aircraft and better then the fulcrum-b india currently has. but 1 on 3 is still a difficult situation for the m2k-5 IMHO.

    Yes in India 29 dont fly against M2k, it was mistake from my end. 29 being an a-2-a version and M2k being a strike aircraft. But as far as i know they do train together. and it is a general opinion that in a-2-a the basic aerodynamics of the 29 are superior.

    pls correct me if wrong

    Regards

    Saub

    in reply to: Spotterday Florennes 14 July #2615855
    raids13
    Participant

    Very true PhantomII not that its not a good plane. But comparatively its very boring. More like a…….. I dont know what. It inspires nothing.

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615860
    raids13
    Participant

    I am on a learning curve guys pls help me. its been 8yrs that i read anything about the fighters. will take some time to get used to the new Techno used.

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615864
    raids13
    Participant

    Long live the Mig 29’s. how much will 1 M2k-5 cost versus 2 Mig 29. not to mention if the Mig 29 is an M2, then how many 29’s can the M2k-5 take on?

    in reply to: Future of LCA #2615868
    raids13
    Participant

    I would really appreciate if someone could tell me what kind of involvement does India have in the development of PAK FA. I am sure the project can have a lot of benefit from the advance tech we use in LCA. Also when is the TD for MCA due?

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615884
    raids13
    Participant

    Met a pilot ? What for ?

    To Tell you exactly how an Indian Mig 29 fares against M2k. And i agree with Cinciboy. Your statement does nothing but start a flame. and for heavens sake lets not douse fire with gasoline. 😮 :p

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615901
    raids13
    Participant

    I would take 1 Mirage 2000 vs 3 Indian Mig-29 anyday of the week

    :rolleyes: cant say much about ur preferences, can I? Ever met an Indian pilot? 😎

    in reply to: Spotterday Florennes 14 July #2615943
    raids13
    Participant

    Nice pics Fly Fort. Keep them coming.

    Regards

    Saub

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615975
    raids13
    Participant

    Mig 29 without missiles, spare parts or pilots (simulators).
    You could get 10 veritech fighters from Robotech, I would prefer the 60millions mirage

    Dont we already have Sims here in india? and also a good indegineous spare part SCM. 20 Mig 29 can be incorporated well and easily into the already existing 65-70 Migs 29s in service. Logistics should not be an issue. Neither should missiles be cause when we buy “used” Mig 29’s as i said we should also be lloking at the Missiles spare etc to be in the deal.

    i would any way take 2 M29’s over 1 M2k

    Regards

    Saub

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2616524
    raids13
    Participant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by flex297
    Are they completely out of their minds? $62.5 mil for a second hand Mirage 2000-5? Who would pay such insane price?

    You don’t have ONLY mirage for that price but missiles, equipment and so on.
    15th July 2005 03:10

    You can get 2 used Mig 29’s for the price of one here. What makes more sense?

    in reply to: The true story of Red October #2095204
    raids13
    Participant

    A true hero of a dificult time. His leadership qualities would have been a boon to USSR and to this world as a whole. Its sad to actually “now” understand the blackness of russian burecarcy.

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2616593
    raids13
    Participant

    Navy favours F-35 fighters, but not in F-18 : Naval Chief
    KOLKATA, JUL 11 (PTI)
    Indian Navy is willing to procure F-35 advanced fighters from US, but it is not interested in F-18 fighter planes as they are not “compatible” with the aircraft carriers of the naval force, Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Arun Prakash said here today.

    “Yes. Given an offer, we will be much interested in having the F-35 fighters,” Admiral Prakash told reporters when asked if the Navy would be willing to procure the advanced fighters from the US.

    He was speaking to reporters after the commissioning of warship INS Beas at the Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Ltd. Admiral Prakash said that the F-18 aircraft, being offered by the US to Indian armed forces, would not be relevant for the Navy. “F-18 is a carrier-borne aircraft, but needs steam catapult (for take-off). It is not compatible to ski-jump and therefore, not suitable for our type of aircraft carriers,” he said. On the other hand the F-35 aircraft were of the ski-jump type and would be suitable for the Navy’s aircraft carriers, he explained.

    The Navy was also looking for acquisition of “reconnoisseur aircraft but not of AWACS type,” Admiral Prakash said, but hastened to add that plans were underway to replace the Sea Harrier fighter aircraft with MiG 29-K and light combat aircraft (LCA). “We have one squadron of fighter aircraft Sea Harrier with INS Virat, but it will be replaced by Mig 29-K or LCA,” he said.

    About the proposal for producing indigenously built submarines, Admiral Prakash said “we have submitted a proposal to the government for building submarines of the Scorpene design, which is of French origin.” Once the proposal is cleared six submarines would be produced at the Mazagon dock and the first of the lot would be rolled out six years after the government nod, he said.

    Hailing the capability of Indian shipyards in producing world-class warships, destroyers, patrol vessels, he said “work is also underway to produce indigenous Aircraft Carrier in the Cochin Shipyard.” The Naval Chief, however, urged the domestic shipyards, which has so far produced 80 ships for the Navy, to improve productivity given the requirements of the force. “It is not a warning, but a request that our shipyards accelerate the pace of production. While we are deeply committed to our PSUs, we just cannot allow force levels to decline. Therefore, if left with no alternative, we shall have to import warships to make up our force levels.” Admiral Prakash also stressed on “thinking seriously of mobilising private sector in support of the national ship-building effort.

    in reply to: the coolest looking jet fighter – top 10 #2617995
    raids13
    Participant

    1. Mig 29
    2. Su-30MKI
    3. Mig-25
    4. F-15
    5. F-14
    6. Rafale
    7. Tornado
    8. LCA
    9. Mirage 2000
    10. Spitfire – (I dont know i just could not resist)

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2624194
    raids13
    Participant

    I sure do wish and hope that we get into big time aircraft manufacturing and development.

    Building P3c and C130 in india will surely be a boost to the industry as we will have to first set up facilities to build bigger aircrafts.

    By the way what happened to the HAL Transport aircraft that was in development, i read about that in school some 7 yrs back?

    I agree with you that fighter maybe not but transports we can surely lay our hands on with the USA

    Thanks,

    Saurabh

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 392 total)