Main guidelines according my view:
1. – Modernize all Su-25 up to the most modern Russian standard.
2. – Phase-out all Su-24.3. Unfortunately there is no much material to exchange with Russia for the benefit of Ukrainian Air Force.
1. Russian frogfoot are standard, what is modernized there ?
2. why ?
3. there is material Russia needs that is *moooney* 😉
It also confirms what has been thought before, that the cockpit is identical to that of the Su-35S.
similar doesn means identic system…
Sukhoi maybe just try to save time by using familiar cockpit layout, but what those screen shows could be different between both aircraft 🙂
^
what is the ‘substantially reduced radar signature’ means ? S-duct ? I dont see any new geometry there that reduce radar signature :confused:
Can the Russian Navy to maintain the operation of the aircraft carrier Kuznetsov until the entry of new carrier service in the Russian Navy after 2020?
when they finish this they dont have any destroyer and cruiser to guard it 😮
buy Mi-17 would solve that problem 😎
Now, what “European aerospace powers with a large degree of sovereignity” could that be?
Could it be France!?
France sells Mistral to Russia — perhaps they will get something in return…?
or simply a 5th gen Rafale replacement 🙂
Commercial supplement:
Interesting, they are quite bold with the 2015 date… But then again this is marketing…
a decade ago they were quite bold with 2007 first flight date….;)
Navalized Sukhoi PAKFA would be better alternative :diablo:
Personally I …? 🙂
good assesmnt 🙂
my favorite is that guy from Puerto Rico wrote:
“could someone explain to us how can a country who is supposed to be in an economic crisis for quite time know, and a third world country are developing a Fith Generation bird to compete with our Raptor. How can this possible? Arent we the most technological advanced air force?”
😀
ah, you just misunderstood… he speak about his country 😉
Because the most feared fighter in the Gulf War was the Mig-29 🙂
People get exited by airshows, and turn rate comparisons, there are more important things for air combat, no, i’m not talking about radar or sensor fusion..or electronic magic 🙂
The 25/31 was/is a threat for any ‘teen’ fighter, actually it was/is a ‘teen’ killer.
Neither the mig-29, su-27,or the T-50 will finish the 25/31 legacy
That aircraft is way too important
iirc in Gulf War MiG-25 found to be superior compared to MiG-29, shooting an F-18 and escaping the pursuing F-15….
I need someone who is familiar or knows the langugae from the url address above. I am lost and trying to find the 3-view drawings from that site, particularly today’s jets…
you only need to learn cyrillic…
then open this :
http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw_fn.html
posleboyenny isterbitel (post-war i;e modern fighter)
http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw_an.html
for ground strike and bomber
http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw_on.html
for modern miscellaneous plane
http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw_c.html
for vertoley (from ‘vertol’ i;e helicopter n VTOL)
Could you pls show me a source to that statement?
First of all the NAPO are in no condition to manufact an export version Su-34 and at the same time forfilling the RuAF procurment..
Second, i have never come across any reports that suggest that the Su-34 are open for export.
Thanks
RIA Novosti,
NOVOSIBIRSK: The introduction of Russia’s latest fighter-bomber into active service with the country’s air force will make the plane more attractive on global export markets, the head of the corporation producing the aircraft said Thursday.
“Widespread use of the Su-34 following its purchase by the Russian Air Force will boost sales on external arms markets,” Sukhoi holding Director General Mikhail Pogosyan said.
It is designed to replace the Su-24 Fencer frontline bombers in the Air Force.
Su-22 is the export version for the Su-17. Su-24 and Su-34 are bombers, so that’s appropriate. Su-30, Yak-38 and Tu-28 are some of the exceptions to the rule though, its true. However, its a rule thats followed a lot more than its broken.
Su-30 are fighter bomber intended for export hence the ’30’, 28 are exception, as for Yaks, it seem yak use even number for fighter (before there are yak-28 firebar iirc)
Loadsa stuff (a wide range of radars, lots more), & is owned by Finmeccanica – which also owns Agusta Westland, Alenia, Oto Melara, etc., etc. – oohhh, lots & lots.
never know that bfore, finnmec such huge company 😮