dark light

rsetiawan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 266 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ukrainian fighter replacement #2429338
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Main guidelines according my view:

    1. – Modernize all Su-25 up to the most modern Russian standard.
    2. – Phase-out all Su-24.

    3. Unfortunately there is no much material to exchange with Russia for the benefit of Ukrainian Air Force.

    1. Russian frogfoot are standard, what is modernized there ?
    2. why ?
    3. there is material Russia needs that is *moooney* 😉

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2430082
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    It also confirms what has been thought before, that the cockpit is identical to that of the Su-35S.

    similar doesn means identic system…
    Sukhoi maybe just try to save time by using familiar cockpit layout, but what those screen shows could be different between both aircraft 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2430255
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    ^
    what is the ‘substantially reduced radar signature’ means ? S-duct ? I dont see any new geometry there that reduce radar signature :confused:

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2006324
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Can the Russian Navy to maintain the operation of the aircraft carrier Kuznetsov until the entry of new carrier service in the Russian Navy after 2020?

    when they finish this they dont have any destroyer and cruiser to guard it 😮

    in reply to: Defence's new choppers are duds: report #2430366
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    buy Mi-17 would solve that problem 😎

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2430386
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Now, what “European aerospace powers with a large degree of sovereignity” could that be?

    Could it be France!?

    France sells Mistral to Russia — perhaps they will get something in return…?

    or simply a 5th gen Rafale replacement 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2430620
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Commercial supplement:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sponsored/russianow/business/7318353/Russias-Sukhoi-stealth-fighter-tested.html

    Interesting, they are quite bold with the 2015 date… But then again this is marketing…

    a decade ago they were quite bold with 2007 first flight date….;)

    in reply to: Rafale M a possibility for RN if F-35 axed (Times article) #2006857
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Navalized Sukhoi PAKFA would be better alternative :diablo:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2431394
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Personally I …? 🙂

    good assesmnt 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2431507
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    my favorite is that guy from Puerto Rico wrote:

    “could someone explain to us how can a country who is supposed to be in an economic crisis for quite time know, and a third world country are developing a Fith Generation bird to compete with our Raptor. How can this possible? Arent we the most technological advanced air force?”
    😀

    ah, you just misunderstood… he speak about his country 😉

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2431639
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Because the most feared fighter in the Gulf War was the Mig-29 🙂

    People get exited by airshows, and turn rate comparisons, there are more important things for air combat, no, i’m not talking about radar or sensor fusion..or electronic magic 🙂

    The 25/31 was/is a threat for any ‘teen’ fighter, actually it was/is a ‘teen’ killer.

    Neither the mig-29, su-27,or the T-50 will finish the 25/31 legacy

    That aircraft is way too important

    iirc in Gulf War MiG-25 found to be superior compared to MiG-29, shooting an F-18 and escaping the pursuing F-15….

    in reply to: Need Some Help… #2431802
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    http://www.airwar.ru/

    I need someone who is familiar or knows the langugae from the url address above. I am lost and trying to find the 3-view drawings from that site, particularly today’s jets…

    you only need to learn cyrillic…
    then open this :
    http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw_fn.html
    posleboyenny isterbitel (post-war i;e modern fighter)

    http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw_an.html
    for ground strike and bomber

    http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw_on.html
    for modern miscellaneous plane

    http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw_c.html
    for vertoley (from ‘vertol’ i;e helicopter n VTOL)

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2431829
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Could you pls show me a source to that statement?

    First of all the NAPO are in no condition to manufact an export version Su-34 and at the same time forfilling the RuAF procurment..

    Second, i have never come across any reports that suggest that the Su-34 are open for export.

    Thanks

    RIA Novosti,

    NOVOSIBIRSK: The introduction of Russia’s latest fighter-bomber into active service with the country’s air force will make the plane more attractive on global export markets, the head of the corporation producing the aircraft said Thursday.

    “Widespread use of the Su-34 following its purchase by the Russian Air Force will boost sales on external arms markets,” Sukhoi holding Director General Mikhail Pogosyan said.

    It is designed to replace the Su-24 Fencer frontline bombers in the Air Force.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2431971
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Su-22 is the export version for the Su-17. Su-24 and Su-34 are bombers, so that’s appropriate. Su-30, Yak-38 and Tu-28 are some of the exceptions to the rule though, its true. However, its a rule thats followed a lot more than its broken.

    Su-30 are fighter bomber intended for export hence the ’30’, 28 are exception, as for Yaks, it seem yak use even number for fighter (before there are yak-28 firebar iirc)

    in reply to: Saab JAS 39 Gripen Info # 2 #2431994
    rsetiawan
    Participant

    Loadsa stuff (a wide range of radars, lots more), & is owned by Finmeccanica – which also owns Agusta Westland, Alenia, Oto Melara, etc., etc. – oohhh, lots & lots.

    never know that bfore, finnmec such huge company 😮

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 266 total)