No idea if Skyflash is actually used by Oman, Malaysia, or Indonesia. I have only seen photos with sidewinders, but there are not many MK200 photos around. So who knows?
The Hawk 200 has 11 hardpoints(2 Wingtip, 8 wing, 1 under-fuselage) so max load-out could theoreticaly be 4 AIM-9L(2 outboard wing pylon, 2 wingtip), 2 Skyflash/AMRAAM(Inboard wing pylon) and 1 250 Gallon fuel tank under the fuseage.
AMRAAM is just theoretical I assume, as the 3 MK200 operating nations would not be cleared by the US for AMRAAM sales.
TNI-AU dont have any skyflash, nor AIM-9L
our Hawk use AIM-9P4 (these are standard on our western planes) and FFAR rocket. The 209 can use AGM-65G but rarely carry it….
Here all remaining users:
UAE Mk102
Oman Mk103
Malaysia TUDM Mk108 special paint
Indonesia TNI-AU Mk108
RAF Mk100
ROKAF Mk67 (this is actually some kind of strange hybrid between the Mk50/60 series and Mk100 series)
no, ours (Indonesia) are not Mk.108 but Mk.109….
the plane looks obsolete…. remind me to early mirage III :diablo:
You mean the same fact sheet that says the F-15 can go 1875 mph? :diablo:
Not sure how those “fact” sheets came up with their number but Global Security has the following numbers:
Total Production (For US) A/B/C/D/E: 1065
Current Inventory: 921Apparently the disparity between those is the 100 or so sitting in the boneyard and losses. No idea how the fact sheets arrived at their number.
Air Force Magazine lists 708 in the “active inventory” for 2007. So who knows what the actual number is?
Just FYI government fact sheets (at least the US ones) generally suck a$$ for accuracy.
global security aint accurate too….:rolleyes:
Hi,
do you know the colour deck of the Parchims class Corvette?
Indonesia operates Parchim-I Project 133.1 or Parchim-II Project 133.1M class corvettes?
Do you have any idea of the colour references used on Indonesia Parchims?BTW Parchim-I and Parchim-II are produced by Kombrig at 1/700 scale.
http://kombrig.homestead.com/Distribution.htmlthanks in advance
Ayala Botto
Lisbon, Portugal
the deck is very very very dark grey– almost black…
If I could find the old mag about it ill put a photo here….
So you think the Hermes will be rated as high for armor penetration as the Vikhr?
Seems like a lot of places online think they are the same missile?!
Was the Hermes a development of the Vikhr?
entirely different missile…different guidance, different range etc (ataka about 10km and germes… very very very long range for atgm)
penetration, not known as the missile not operational yet but if you make exotic ATGM with 20km range you surely wouldnt put weak warhead on it. Heck, even the cheaper at-15 krizantema have 1000+ mm penetration…..
It’s like comparing a Lada with a Peugeot
better analogue is Mirage 2000 vs MiG-35 :diablo:
more on my nation parchim 😀
Certainly a pretty a little thing. Good way of putting the reasonably good manufacturing skills of the old military industrial complex to good use in the civilian sector too. But surely they could have come up with something more imaginative than Superjet?:rolleyes:
what u means imaginative ? add thrust vectoring and being the first airliner capable of cobra maneuver ? using KM-36DM as passenger seat for increased safety ? :diablo:
unfortunately the conservative airliner dont like those features…. for them nowadays it is fuel/km that matter…..
How dare you ? How many OMNI role fighters has russia developed EVER 😉 ???
LOL….
omni role, ….
those term come from aircraft brochures, not their capability :diablo:
what the rafale can that cant be done by grippen, fulcrum, m2k etc etc ?
IMO the ships wont be too useful. too few grad to be useful (8 iirc)… and what the ship for ? bombarding enemy coastal ? ships are too small to cross the ocean. Bombarding their own motherland ? (the special part called chechnya and such ?)… they might frozen in winter river and became sitting duck.
I like the idea of artillery warship but plz put it on serious platform plus…
They should put 1-2 batteries of extended range smerch….:dev2:
Prove I said anything about K-22s being in service, (quote me like I said – since I just mentioned using Kh-22s on Bears, not Tu-95K22s ……
sorry to dig this hell again :diablo:
but IIRC isnt Tu-95K22 is the variant that can carry Kh-22 :confused:
so both are one package. Tu-95 that is not K22 cant carry Kh22 and Tu-95 modified to carry Kh-22 will renamed with K22 suffix … so if there is no Tu-95K22 mean no Tu-95 able to use Kh-22
Kazan Helicopters is a RUSSIAN company – based in Kazan city on the river Volga.
It was a production plant of the Mil OKB.
They have recently started their own design – the Ansat being one of them.
They have also developed an Armed Reconaissance version using the Ansat dynamics with a new tanden two seat fuselage.
I took the accompanying photos at MAKS a week ago….
They also make the ‘Aktai’ – a small piston engined light helicopter.
Check out their website at :- http://kazanhelicopters.com/index.php
Ken
Why they copy Hughes 500 and early Mangusta ?:eek:
Neuron is an X-45C painted black. Skat at least looks original :diablo: Seriously though, given the apprent level of interest I’d give Neuron a better shot of actually taking to the air. Some day.
both skat and neuron are flyable. Aerodynamic wise they are not as crappy as have blue. If half diamond can fly so do they, so do Skat
It flew and demonstrated low RCS against then state of the art radars. Compared to a simple mockup yes indeed, it is a big deal.
Sorry must disagree…
In fact Have blue life begun with silly mockup too. And the mockup is totally silly much worse than skat.. much less airworthy.