RAF accused over multi-billion Voyager contract
The RAF may be paying billions of pounds too much for its new, air-to-air
refuelling Voyager aircraft, the BBC has discovered.(No change there then :mad:)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18020809
Since when did the RAF buy their own aircraft ?
maybe the govt close their eyes and pay the overexpensive price as a kind of black subsidy….
as opposed to the ultra modern 5th gen jet fighters that Indonesia is developing, while purchasing the oh-so breathtakingly 2000s looking T-50 Golden Eagles right ? :rolleyes:
we dont develop T50, there is a lightweight fighter development project, mostly Korean with Indonesian as minor partner with 20% or so share which dont have any relationships with T50, and this dont even have any official drawing yet you cant said what it looks like..
looks soo 80s….
I remember long long time ago UK experimenting with skyhook… can that system work for vtol F35 ?

You forgot to add Washington DC. :rolleyes:
Small portion??
Well at least you called a spade, a spade.
US is created over physical and cultural genocide of american natives
and if a state of US rebelling, US will be much more brutal than China, fortunately we wont see that soon….
the problem is Greece spends alot of money too! the money has to come from somewhere.
There’s lots of talk about Greece leaving the Euro..
if that happens, perhaps Greece should join a union with Russia-Belarus-Kazakhstan instead.it makes the most sense on many strategic and cultural levels.
how ?? it helps with combatting turkey over cyprus ? but if they are still euroNATO block other euro nation wont help turkey, if they quit this might change…
whichever they still must learn to spend less and work more. replace gov’t officer’s BMW with Lada or GAZ from Russia might help in ‘spend less’ side, but im not sure if it will help the ‘work more’ side…
scrap every aircraft and disbanding the entire airforce under ‘make peace, not war’ slogan right before election year 😀
Arguably, the free market has a better history of supporting industry than governments do. For an example, look what has happened to the UK aviation and auto industries.
never know UK have autoindustries….
Lotus are malaysian, jaguar are indian, rolls royce are germany….
Nice pic of 4 Ansat-Us handed over to the MOD earlier this year.
nice chopper…
looks similar to ka-60 though…
At last some official news about the long awaited AL-31FM2 engine performance.
Now the neath thing about this engine if we compair it with Saturns 117S engine is that it require no internal or external rework of the airframe to install the FM2 engine.
This is not the case with the 117S engine which have a larger forward comp fan diameter(Su-35S airframe).Also they state that it will improve in fuel consumption and TBO.
It is unclear if the max nominall thrust is 14.000kgf with a special setting for 14.500kgf, which can be engaged on the pilot command, or if max power setting is indeed 14.500kgf.
And also the increased tear & wear on the airframe itself due to more thrust. It should be some increase strenght on internal structure if you ask me.. if not the engine TBO may increase but the airframe total life may decrease..
wonder why they dont put 31FM/FM1/FM2 as standard engine… if they do export customers will be most happy one as 31fm/1/2 have much longer TBO compared to standard Al-31F.
Simple physics. Torque is force x lever arm. Mount a turret in the front of the helicopter and the recoil generates a greater torque on the airframe kicking the entire helicopter UP and throwing the whole thing off the target. A gun fixed to the middle of the airframe all else equal will exert a lesser torque on the helicopter and thus not kick the entire bird off its target by quite so much.
One of the biggest reasons crews dont like the Mi-28N is the turreted gun. It is actually NOT a popular feature.
if so why the gun turreted again now on the newer hind :confused:
now if british have extra carrier they can sell it to China…
that will be interesting :diablo:
Fixed guns are much more accurate than turret installationr.
how :confused: with turret you can aim the gun via your FCS, got solution and the turret will be stabilized to target (?), but with the 30mm fixed cannon you must maneuver the entire hind body and in afgan strong wind to aim that would be difficult isn it ? (or the 30mm can be aimed to low degree ?)
No major redesign, as far as we know.
Some issues are to be expected.
who knows ?
the su-27 is very very different with its prototype….completely different fin and wing, different engine position, much shorter nose etc etc, almost everything different…
could happened to PAKFA too….
Best quote on the Telegraph article:
As to the article I’m not sure whether it really consitutes anything actually newsworthy. The F-35C can fly 300nm and loiter 80 minutes where -35B can only loiter 20. So what?. If the environment is permissive enough to allow such loitering why would you want to do it with your expensive fastjet and not with a MALE UAV in the first place?!. Dont get that one…we arent going to have enough JCA to see them wasting flight hours uselessly running racetracks 300nm downrange!. Closer-in basing and rapid reaction to proper recce asset tasking calls is by far the better solution, for us, than the necessity to deploy fresh fighters on cab rank every hour and a half.
more endurance always better, except RN want their aircraft merely to protect the fleet…F-35C will end up cheaper over long term…
well I know sun has set now in the british empire but….