Just one maybe stupid question, but IMO it seems as if there a wide gab between both weapon-bays doors !?
Deino :confused:
http://russianplanes.net/images/to52000/051601.jpg
Mi-28NE, recent pic. You can see the launch detector on the fuselage.
Isn’t the NE the export version ?? … besides that it looks good in that light-grey.
😉
Hmmm … what’s so special on this photo ?? T50-KNS .. or already T50-3 ?
She just came home ….
:confused: You are correct there’s something under the belly and additionally IMO someone “doctored” a bit on that photo since it shows nearyl two different halfs ! :confused:
Deino
Seems as “she” is already out: 😮
China’s refitted aircraft carrier platform sets sail for first sea trial
China’s refitted aircraft carrier platform sets sail for first sea trial
English.news.cn 2011-08-10 06:37:01http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-08/10/c_131039286.htm
File photo of China’s refitted aircraft carrier. The aircraft carrier left its shipyard at Dalian Port in northeast Liaoning Province on Wednesday morning to start its first sea trial. Military sources said that the first sea trial was in line with schedual of the carrier’s refitting project and would not take a long time. After returning from the sea trial, the aircraft carrier will continue refit and test work. (Xinhua Photo)
DALIAN, Aug. 10 (Xinhua) — China’s refitted aircraft carrier left its shipyard at Dalian Port in northeast Liaoning Province on Wednesday morning to start its first sea trial.
Military sources said that the first sea trial was in line with schedual of the carrier’s refitting project and would not take a long time. After returning from the sea trial, the aircraft carrier will continue refit and test work.
The carrier was originally built by the former Soviet Union which named it Varyag yet failed to complete the ship’s construction before collapsing in 1991. The still-unnamed aircraft carrier was an empty shell. Ukraine disarmed it and removed its engines before selling it to China.
… sadly no photos by now.
Deino
it is not clear if j11a can use r77, true, but chronologically, didn’t the j11a come after the last batch of ubks? that would point to likelyhood of all the flankers coming after the ubks having at least same avionics.
alternatively, if the planes were modernized after being bought, during their service, it is even likelier all the j11a have r77 integrated, as why would anyone in their right mind modernized the trainer flankers but not the flankers meant for combat?
Agreed !
as for j10b, it sure does look like a new position for rwr, especially if you look at j10a, which has a similar thingy on the side of the intake, but here in j10b thats missing and the new thingy is moved half a meter up, near the canards.
Upps … I never noticed that and so a new RWR is highly likely.
Another clear shot of J10B PT 05.

Nice … Did You notice the minor change in fron of the Canards ??? … is it a new RWR or something similar or an aerodynamic feature to increase the vortex over the canards ?
Not all.
Su-30MKK/MK2 (76 MKK, 24 MK2) : R-77 compatible
Su-27UBK (3rd batch, 28 planes) : R-77 compatible
J-11B/BS/BH/BSH : PL-12 compatibleSu-27SK, batch 1 & 2 of the Su-27UBK cannot use the R-77. The is question mark over the J-11/11A. It not clear whether they can use the R-77.
So, is this also an option for the Su-27SK’s ???? :confused:
Deino
Agreed … it’s a typical Chinese step-by-step … as such the latest order will be most likely for the first Block 07 J-10B (on regiment for the PLAAF + the PAF-order) and after that – if the test with 05 are promising – Block 08 “could” be powered by the WS-10A.
Deino
You are right, but the Su-30’s have also a twin-front-gear … and this one with the R-77 has the typical single one from the UBK-trainer.
Deino
deino,
i think the joined wing UAV looks like a mock up too. It is interesting how these new designs are being leaked out…
Hmmm … in mind of the lastet photos I think it’s actually a real one and not only a mock-up. Why should a mock up have a air-data-probe/pitot or why should they test someting with these RCS-tests/-triangles on a mock up … :confused:
But I’m interested if there are some new’s on that “thing” !?
Deino
😎
Sorry for OT.
It started with the J-20 need the Ventral fins or not..Bear in mind this is not only a news thread, but also open for discussion/debate.
Agreed and really no offence ! 😉
And even if Your discussion started quite interesting … it’s now too much OT (at least for me !). :p
Deino
ÄÄhhhmmm guys … would You like to open a new tread to discuss Your personnel opinions on aerodynamics, air-show observations and so on … to admit it’s a bit anoying if one expects something new on the J-20 … and has to read Your discussion !? 😡