Very nice … but I like Matej’s better !!! 😀
http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/
http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/images/PAK_FA_teaser.jpg
Deino
MiG-29K pics from the induction day ceremony. pics courtesy of Chindits blogspot.
Nice pictures of a nice “bird” … but I hace to admit, I miss the sleeker lines of the earlier single-seater. 🙁
Deino
So long, Deino.
Yes I know that page but actually mwhat do You want to prove ??
There’s so much written about the T-50 … there was and there is so much speculation about the parameters, the dimensions, its performances and so on … and even now !
Are You sure everything what’s written there is 100% asured ?
I remember not too long agao a post – sadly I don’t remember weho posted it – that the T-50 will have two guns, weapons bays for 12-16 missilies .. heyho !
And now ???
Is it so difficult just to take a look to the S-37’s bay and agree that this one won’t fit 4 R-77 ?
Again the T-50’s bay could be larger – I don’t know – they could be adjustable to fit them staggered … o.k. … but just tell me:
Do You think the S-37’s bay could hold 4 missiles in the configuration shown ???
… a simple YES or NO …. !
And more I haven’t made as “predictions/educated guesses/deductive reasoning”.
Deino
Deino there is really nothing to keep track over.
If you learn to use the ‘advanced search’ on this forum you can get full access to all the members earlier posting.
Its really that simple.Thanks
I know … but because of this What are these wrong “predictions/educated guesses/deductive reasoning” ??
I only have my daubts and all I see – to admit from the single picture of the S-37’s bay – i my conclusion that here 4 R-77’s won’t fit.
Tell me what’s wrong with that “educated guesses” !!?
I never said that the T-50’s bay will never be able to accomodate more AAMs, I never said that this bay coun’t be reconfigurable … but THIS bay shown on the picture is too small for 4 R-77, and that’s simply a fact. END !
Deino
Don’t be sad, Deino. IIrc, your track record accuracy on PAK-FA predictions/educated guesses/deductive reasoning, stands at ~0.0%.
….
Hey that’s funny ! Never noticed that to record my “predictions/educated guesses/deductive reasoning” is You hobby.
Besides that I only took a look at the open bay and IMO what I said is not wrong: There are actually only two launcher/pylons ! Maybe You know more (for sure You do), maybe You’ve seen the real T-50’s bay but in mind of the information – and here I would say FACTS – I try to make “predictions/educated guesses/deductive reasoning”.
The fact that You don’t like them since they don’t fit into You hyper-super-duper fighter picture is actually not my problem.
Just compare with paralay’s drawing … 4 R-77 is impossible ! … Three would be realistic … but then; Where’s the third launcher ?
However I for myself always try to learn from each – ohh… to be exactly most members – posts … but You only want to hear a hail to Your opinon.
So long, Deino :diablo:
4 R-77 or 2 “izd.810”
Hmmm … to be honest … looks very much “scrambled” and IMO if the launcher’s shown can not be replaced by others that could carry more R-77’s I think the bay is only large enough to hold two missiles each ! 🙁
Deino :confused:
Regarding the S-37’s new weapons bay – IMO a replica of the T-50’s – there’s a picture published in the latest Fug Revue (03.2010 / page 14) with the open bay right from the bottom … sadly my scanner is out of order and therefore only via the camera.
Does anyone have a better one … or even the original one ??
Deino
Here’s some recent ‘shots in the dark’ from the authority that is F-16.net, enjoy:
…and my favourite:
And this is my most favourite regarding Carlo Kopp’s credibility:
“…the only viable strategic survival strategy now remaining for the United States is to terminate the Joint Strike Fighter program immediately, redirect freed funding to further develop the F-22 Raptor, and employ variants of the F-22 aircraft as the primary fighter aircraft for all United States and Allied TACAIR needs.”
Besides that there’s an ongoing discussion at the German FlugzeugForum about possibly three already flying prototypes. I thought, that the second flyable one is only in final construction yet … ??!!! :confused:
Any idea on that !?
Deino
Me too .. Matej only posted this part !
PS: Just noteced … This part is via Matej onad not flateric !” SORRY !!!!
Deino
Thanks … are there some more pictures of the aircarft involved in that ceremony ??
Deino
😮 … via “Matej” (Secret Projects Forum !!)
Deino 😀
I think there’s currently not such an urgency since they replace the Q-5 at first … esp. with the arrival of the F-16C/D.
Deino
Thanks for posting !
Do You know anything about its status ?? will it be only for testing or is it planned to be used in front-line use ?
Deino
First Squadron of JF-17 Thunder inducted in PAF
….
Hmmm … I thought no. 26 would receive newly delivered aircrafts ?? … or is this no. 103 from the first production block only shown on display ?
At SDF someone reported, that no. 26 Sqn has so far received ONLY 14 of its aircraft … HAs anyone better information, but as far as I know the last one produced was no. 111 with three (or maybe 4 more) via CAC … so could be no. 112 – 114.
If this is true, then the first unit would be formed only by the first serial models. :confused:
Deino
THANKS but I only posted the link !!
Regarding the upper side I’m almost sure this is photoshoped !
Deino