Morgan and Shacklady is the Spitaholics bible, in my view. I picked up an ‘as new’ copy a few years ago on Amazon for £18 plus p&p.
OOps sorry old chap,but what you guys are doing is equally impressive..
Thanks. I think you are doing great things with your Spitfire, and now with the new 3D Spitfires site too. 🙂
[ATTACH]184877[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]184878[/ATTACH]
Mmmmm ! The low back Type 361s are my favourite !… especially the Mk.IXs.
I think the conventional high back is superior for speed though.
Well I got sent this by a mate..Wonder if it is the same..
http://www.spitfire3d.com/newparts.html
I was aware of these four Spitfires, but there is nothing in my site relating to them. There will be some interesting work going into them !
‘Any idea was the date of Cooper’s attack?
The ‘y’ in Tirpity might just be someone’s longhand, lowercase ‘z’
The CDs in common circulation have about 3500 drawings. In total I would estimate there would have been nearer 20000 for the Spitfire. I have heard there may be a lot more at Hendon that have not been catalogued.
If it’s PR.IV it has no weapons. The leading edge D box is all fuel tank (wet).
Michelin do an interesting ‘Bataille de Normandie’ map, No.102. You can buy copies in tourist shops all over Normandy. I expect they do others too.
Definitely not a real Spit, but beautifully done. When the wings are on nobody will see the difference !
If I was interested in making full scale statics I would use Corecell SAN foam. It is available in planks or sheet in varying thicknesses and densities. It is very easy to work with. If bi-axial glass reinforcement is used in the skins a very fair surface finish can be easily produced.
Corecell was originally made by ATC in Canada. Now Gurit (ex-SP) market it.
Please can you tell me where you managed to get the photo from?
The Spit has amazing camo…. You just can’t see it ! 😀
Runway heading numbers look like 11 to me !
REF, I have seen your query from time to time but I can’t remember if anyone has asked you if there could be a possibility that the photo has been printed “reversed”. Would it help those who have spent some time on this to see a reversed picture alongside the current one?
Regards, Aerial
This is a better theory than my far north / Arctic one.