dark light

inkworm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 1,224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 63 Sqn Hurricanes and codes #829753
    inkworm
    Participant

    It’s surprising as most squadrons especially the longer established ones would have had codes so I wonder if they genuinely didn’t apply anything to their aircraft and that could be why I haven’t come across any photos yet.

    in reply to: 63 Sqn Hurricanes and codes #829884
    inkworm
    Participant

    Wiki has a strange gap between 39 and 45 as do all the other usual sites.

    in reply to: BBMF Spitfire at BHHH for work #779077
    inkworm
    Participant

    Last repainted in 2012 but had temporary markings this season.

    in reply to: Dakota crest identifcation #779434
    inkworm
    Participant

    That’s perfect.

    in reply to: Dakota crest identifcation #779863
    inkworm
    Participant

    Many thanks for that Iain, I really appreciate it.

    I don’t suppose you still have the original photos which show it in more detail?

    in reply to: Kittyhawk delivery colours. #793751
    inkworm
    Participant

    Thanks all, I know that very few were delivered but do have photos of a few of the very first batch and just wanted a second opinion.

    in reply to: Vikings, Varsities and Valettas #822006
    inkworm
    Participant

    I don’t suppose anyone has a photo of a Varsity with the Suez stripes? I believe there is one in Wings over Suez but I don’t have access to it. I’ve seen some profiles which are reportedly accurate but would like to see the photos to confirm it.

    in reply to: XP-39 first flight date. #824657
    inkworm
    Participant

    I do wonder though who compiled that information on the site, was it a dedicated historian or just someone who needed a bit of copy? I have seen errors on other company websites in the past.

    But this does further cloud the issue of the date.

    in reply to: XP-39 first flight date. #824803
    inkworm
    Participant

    Thank you for taking the time to give a breakdown and you do make a very convincing argument Graham, plus the link to the document in 1941 supports this (thanks Beermat).

    in reply to: XP-39 first flight date. #825205
    inkworm
    Participant

    Thanks, I’ve had similar answers elsewhere so am still none the wiser on which year it is.

    in reply to: Whirlwind fighter identification and nose art query #799444
    inkworm
    Participant

    Do any photos exist of the other chalked on nose art as it would be very interesting to see.

    The original Bellows was P7055, there was also P7094 Bellows Fellowship and the others ran from P7116 to P7122

    in reply to: Whirlwind fighter identification and nose art query #799798
    inkworm
    Participant

    If it was transferred on the 24th of June and the photo was taken during the summer I have a 50/50 chance of getting the squadron code right.

    Would you care to make an educated guess on which it is more likely to be?

    in reply to: Whirlwind fighter identification and nose art query #799817
    inkworm
    Participant

    According to Valiant’s Whirlwind book P7055 Bellows wore both the letters S and W whilst with 137 squadon so Beaumont was likely to be just showing off his work as SoGlad has just said.

    Thank you for all the help and now it’s just a case of interpreting the chicken.

    in reply to: Whirlwind fighter identification and nose art query #800502
    inkworm
    Participant

    It is some type of bird, but does anyone know the serial number of the Whirlwind? As that might help.

    in reply to: RAF P-39 service career #818156
    inkworm
    Participant

    Was the P-38 ever used on operations or was it just evaluated by the RAF though?

    And I would guess the undercarriage configuration and suspension would have been a redeeming factor for the Airacobra during carrier trials.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 1,224 total)