dark light

d'clacy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 180 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Australia adds 34 more MRH-90s. #2580858
    d’clacy
    Participant

    You have forgotten the Army’s Blackhawks, Huey, Kiowa, etc.

    d’clacy
    Participant

    What are they getting for the $1.4bl.? The 4 BAM ships plus the F100? Surely not. We are paying $8bn for 3 F100 (if they are selected) for the RAN. 😮

    in reply to: It's official, RAAF to get C-17's #2571417
    d’clacy
    Participant

    I have read where an Antonov aircraft was amongst those being considered as a Caribou replacement. Does anyone have any idea on which one it would be?

    d’clacy
    Participant

    I would have preferred Australia to get only one of these ships, plus two or three smaller Australian designed ships, such as Austal’s or Incat’s.

    in reply to: Before this dies again! #2057367
    d’clacy
    Participant

    Ja, I have not been able to post there for quite a while. Is there anyway you can inform me of my exact user name and current password.
    Thanks.
    Barry Clacy

    in reply to: your country armed forces your way #2600055
    d’clacy
    Participant

    RAAF
    38 Su34 (Replace F111)
    76 F35 (USAF variant) replace F18
    6 Wedgetail (As is)
    8 A340 tanker/transport
    6 C17 heavy airlift
    24 A400 transport
    16 AN-32 light transport
    Retain current training aircraft.
    Retain 19 Orions
    11 Global Hawk UAV’s

    RAN
    24 F35B
    20 NH-90 (Maritime version)
    11 Seasprite

    Army
    40 NH-90
    32 Euro Tiger

    in reply to: Before this dies again! #2059012
    d’clacy
    Participant

    JA @ Orth. Can I change my user name there without losing ranking?

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2560976
    d’clacy
    Participant

    This looks like the perfect replacement for the RAAF’s F111’s.

    in reply to: Super-Super-Hornet #2566962
    d’clacy
    Participant

    It was in the news about 6 months ago that Boing were going to take advantage of the delays in the F35 program to develop a further model of the F18 with the USN in mind, and I think it was going to have stealth features and maybe supercruise. I have not been able to see anything further on it though. It was to be in production in 2010, several years before the F35.

    in reply to: Super-Super-Hornet #2567450
    d’clacy
    Participant

    SOC thanks for the effort, but no mention of it there.

    in reply to: Export F-35's are "substantially downgraded" #2567771
    d’clacy
    Participant

    From my understanding the British put in more than money. Some of the VTOL etc technology is actually theirs, or based on theirs.

    in reply to: Norway to Back out of F-35 JSF Over Industrial Share #2567777
    d’clacy
    Participant

    From todays “The Age” newspaper

    Australia pushes for US plane secrets

    March 16, 2006

    Advertisement
    AdvertisementSENIOR defence officials have warned the US that Australia could pull out of the revolutionary Joint Strike Fighter Project if the Americans refuse to share high-tech secrets.

    Australia’s defence adviser in Washington, Rear Admiral Raydon Gates, told the US Senate Committee on Armed Services yesterday that Australia would not join the next stage in the aircraft’s development unless the US guaranteed to pass on access to the technology built into it.

    Australia is a partner with the US and several other countries in the development of the fighter, which is intended to replace the ageing F-111 bombers and F-18 Hornet fighter bombers.

    A final decision on the stealthy, multi-role aircraft will be made by the Government next year. It is expected that Australia will buy up to 100 of them for around $A16 billion.

    The Royal Australian Air Force feels badly burnt by the US refusal to part with intellectual property rights that would have made its fleet of F-111s and Hornets easier and cheaper to maintain and upgrade. That has meant considerable work that could have been done in Australia has gone to US companies — a costly trap the RAAF does not intend falling into again.

    “Guaranteed access to necessary JSF data and technology to allow Australia to operate and support the JSF will be required before we join the next phase of the project,” Admiral Gates said.

    The transfer of the highly sophisticated stealth and other technology in the fighter will require changes to the US International Traffic in Arms Regulations.

    “Legislative change is a difficult road,” Admiral Gates said. “I don’t think it is impossible. I think it is critical to us.”

    in reply to: Super-Super-Hornet #2567880
    d’clacy
    Participant

    Does anyone have any idea where information on the future F18 type aircraft could be found?

    d’clacy
    Participant

    I dont understand why the British have not opted to build a Super Harrier, instead of going for foreign planes.

    in reply to: Better CIWS: Palma/Kashtan? AK630? GoalKeeper? or Phalanx? #2076955
    d’clacy
    Participant

    The Australian Navy has selected Mistral for its CIWS. This is for the Anzac class of frigates which are armed with ESSM. How good a choice is this?

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 180 total)