You have forgotten the Army’s Blackhawks, Huey, Kiowa, etc.
What are they getting for the $1.4bl.? The 4 BAM ships plus the F100? Surely not. We are paying $8bn for 3 F100 (if they are selected) for the RAN. 😮
I have read where an Antonov aircraft was amongst those being considered as a Caribou replacement. Does anyone have any idea on which one it would be?
I would have preferred Australia to get only one of these ships, plus two or three smaller Australian designed ships, such as Austal’s or Incat’s.
Ja, I have not been able to post there for quite a while. Is there anyway you can inform me of my exact user name and current password.
Thanks.
Barry Clacy
RAAF
38 Su34 (Replace F111)
76 F35 (USAF variant) replace F18
6 Wedgetail (As is)
8 A340 tanker/transport
6 C17 heavy airlift
24 A400 transport
16 AN-32 light transport
Retain current training aircraft.
Retain 19 Orions
11 Global Hawk UAV’s
RAN
24 F35B
20 NH-90 (Maritime version)
11 Seasprite
Army
40 NH-90
32 Euro Tiger
JA @ Orth. Can I change my user name there without losing ranking?
This looks like the perfect replacement for the RAAF’s F111’s.
It was in the news about 6 months ago that Boing were going to take advantage of the delays in the F35 program to develop a further model of the F18 with the USN in mind, and I think it was going to have stealth features and maybe supercruise. I have not been able to see anything further on it though. It was to be in production in 2010, several years before the F35.
SOC thanks for the effort, but no mention of it there.
From my understanding the British put in more than money. Some of the VTOL etc technology is actually theirs, or based on theirs.
From todays “The Age” newspaper
Australia pushes for US plane secrets
March 16, 2006
Advertisement
AdvertisementSENIOR defence officials have warned the US that Australia could pull out of the revolutionary Joint Strike Fighter Project if the Americans refuse to share high-tech secrets.
Australia’s defence adviser in Washington, Rear Admiral Raydon Gates, told the US Senate Committee on Armed Services yesterday that Australia would not join the next stage in the aircraft’s development unless the US guaranteed to pass on access to the technology built into it.
Australia is a partner with the US and several other countries in the development of the fighter, which is intended to replace the ageing F-111 bombers and F-18 Hornet fighter bombers.
A final decision on the stealthy, multi-role aircraft will be made by the Government next year. It is expected that Australia will buy up to 100 of them for around $A16 billion.
The Royal Australian Air Force feels badly burnt by the US refusal to part with intellectual property rights that would have made its fleet of F-111s and Hornets easier and cheaper to maintain and upgrade. That has meant considerable work that could have been done in Australia has gone to US companies — a costly trap the RAAF does not intend falling into again.
“Guaranteed access to necessary JSF data and technology to allow Australia to operate and support the JSF will be required before we join the next phase of the project,” Admiral Gates said.
The transfer of the highly sophisticated stealth and other technology in the fighter will require changes to the US International Traffic in Arms Regulations.
“Legislative change is a difficult road,” Admiral Gates said. “I don’t think it is impossible. I think it is critical to us.”
Does anyone have any idea where information on the future F18 type aircraft could be found?
I dont understand why the British have not opted to build a Super Harrier, instead of going for foreign planes.
The Australian Navy has selected Mistral for its CIWS. This is for the Anzac class of frigates which are armed with ESSM. How good a choice is this?