dark light

edi_right_round

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 226 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2095074
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Looks like YF-22,YF-23 and T-50 had a threesome!

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #1995413
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    How big is the destroyer/cruiser fleet nowadays?I know the Moskva class cruisers are there to stay and Kirovs gonna be 2,but what about Udaloys?How many will they modernise to multirole?Can we say that 956 Sovremenny are gone all?

    edi_right_round
    Participant

    You are sick with your Salesman foray or with your anti-Americanism, Shall we bring back Colonialism, Pillory and other medieval deeds to suit your wish that everybody has the right to the the same thing?

    Lol ever heard about the Colonial franc ☺ how many colonial francs does a Rafale cost?

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2107720
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Please spare Rafale data for Rafale topic. 95+% availability was performed during lybian wars, of course this type of performance has consequences within a constraint budget on other planes. Geez what a discover?. Now (last time i compare here), one can compare the 48% availabilty (in US terms full availability i think) to the flat encephalogram look of the same data on F-35 fleet. (which is somehow normal at this stage of the program). But no chest bumping on F-35B availability considering the intensity of given missions please. Rafale were flying between 30 to 40 hours/week during Haramttan…
    Problem is these taes are BS. when you go into comparison (appels to oranges). The real metrics is “doese it fulfill its operational contract”? How many missions cancelled? etc. Nvm. Cu on Rafale Thread.

    Well my friend i know that you must defend the undefendable but to compare the B,with the higher thrust jet engine in the world and the most complicated propulsion too it is a little dirty argumentation.Then deliberately forgetting the tremendous amount of flying,carrier fatigue and years of service under Sequestration of Obama memory is unfair.You mention Mali and Libia campaign,but what about the continuous wars since 9/11 with much older planes and still availability being the same as your brand new Rafales.

    The article posted above by Scooter says all!

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2107723
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Please stop that. It is ridiculous. EFT has better cilmbing rate? Good. So what? It doesn’t change the fact that the climb rate of Rafale is very correct considering its all rounder conception doese it?

    So if Rafale is a better A2G platform so what?Last time i checked the Kinematic performance wasnt a bad thing to have,since all the rest is pretty sound in EF.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2107793
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Very interesting interview with many data. supercruise mach 1.4, 0to 55k feet in one min. etc.

    https://youtu.be/8Xua3049KJg

    That must be from the Fighter podcast.
    Well for an Uber plane has less rate of climb than Su27 or F-15,not mentioning F-2000 the champ!

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2107797
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Halloweene,i beg your pardon.
    However you might flip it,its 48% of the fleet out.As for availability of 98% in Africa or operative places,im so happy and its the right thing to do.It doesnt change the numbers.
    As for the F-2000 and every other fighter bomber,transport and attack helicopters or other armed forces element ,you can only dream those rates of availability.
    A choise was made to have the F-35,and soon they going to be part of the Tempest.We are going to have the most powerful Nato southern flank fleet,all stealthy piu the F2000 all capable plane.Instead till you get the future 6 generation and us the Tempest we would have 20 years with F35 in some block 20 reiteration

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2107927
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Overall, the Fr fighter aircraft reached 44% availability in 2018. The Rafale having a slightly lower rate than the M2K. This was discussed already in the Rafale Thread where should lies a bunch or related documents.

    [ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:tAdlA_DiposnibilyRates.jpg Views:t0 Size:t108.1 KB ID:t3856932″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3856932″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”AdlA_DiposnibilyRates.jpg”}[/ATTACH]

    To the above values; one should add the low availability of essential items like targeting pods that are also quite depressing (the document linked below mentions the 50% readiness rate for the Thalios pod from Thales).

    For those that don’t know their probability laws the Math say that the combined 50% availability of two systems would lead to something available 1/4th of the time. Yes, you understand right: for a single laser strike mission of 2 aircraft required to hit simultaneously two different targets (how original is this?!), you’ll have to ready 8 aircraft fitted with their pods…

    Source:
    French parliament

    It cant be true,french is the best,planes,helicopteurs,Famas,formage etc

    edi_right_round
    Participant

    In other news, apparently the Mig21 wreckage has been put together and all 4 missiles (2 x R73 and 2 R77) are present.

    I’m not a missile expert, can someone confirm if these indeed are R73 and R77?

    The missile on the right R/73,is missing quite a piece.Would be interesting where the warhead is located in R-73

    edi_right_round
    Participant

    er, you should tell that to germans, brits, italians anbd spaniards.. they all pay more than the french… there’s no such thing as economy of scale when you have four building chains for a single fighter.. India would’ve just been the fifth… what’s more, UK and Italy go for the F-35 for ground attack role… they won’t develop anything in that area for the Typhoon anymore (wasting the scarce money they get for their military), spain is broke, so no development there either, as for germany, they have trouble just keeping their air force airborne as the invest so little in the military.. good luck with having them develop anything for your support in the future…

    what’s more, Blackarcher explained to you that a nuclear bomb is NOT a bomb “like any other”… there are specific circuits that have to be installed, tested, configured and so on…

    If math is not an opionon then EF 68m < Rafale 70m,so much of the 4 factories.
    If you and Blackarcher confirm that the Indians are getting nuclear wired Rafales and Asmp A missile then im wrong!
    If not what are you talking about?
    Italy and Uk have made a wise choice looking into the present and future.But LGB,Brimstone and Jdam are there when needed.
    As for Germany keeping theirs airborne what is the actual service rate of AdA or AdT?

    edi_right_round
    Participant

    You are making a lot of confusion.B61 is a bomb so i guess all what is taking is to the interface which i doubt is smth different from other bombs.If the plane has the systems and wires protected against emp as per mil standarts i dont know what is the matter!France hasnt offered you at all anything nuclear,and as a delivery platform is a one way only…If your country is trying to bypass getting the Rafaele than it is ok but are you sure you are getting the manuals,radar and flight profiles for it?
    neither did the Rafale have the Aesa which you kinda ordered apart at a cost of an eye.You could have picked a custom version and still have a lower price since economy of scale is always on Eurofighters side.
    And instead of putting money on Modis pal at Reliance you could have had the line rolling planes at Hal,and no further Sukhoi orders

    edi_right_round
    Participant

    define 5th gen engine?

    E jet, with its simple architecture, is an excellent high speed high altitude engine. Otherwise, lack of inlet guided vane (variable geometry) make of it a “single task” oriented engine.

    Something France has yet to master

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2108460
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Nations “Buy” the present, and fund research on the “future” all the time. This is how most of the stuff is developed around the world so I see no reason as to why Italy, or the UK cannot be finishing up their F-35 acquisition program while also drawing up plans to, and ramping up R&D investments on next generation plans. Isn’t that how the French, the Germany and pretty much everyone else doing it?

    I agree sir.Nobody said otherwise except our french friend.
    Apparently the future in the term of F2000 and F-35 is too much for the french pride.
    Except for some political fight and funds that may delay things but no cancellation

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2108461
    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Hallowene, actually Italy is financing BOTH Typhoon (as acquisition of them have yet to be completed) than F-35.
    Once we’ll have completed the first program and that second would exit from LRIP we’ll have plenty of resource to finance a research project actually at its very initial phase (or have mistaken that mock-up for something real?).

    🙂

    398 mil euro was just payed to LockMart!Salvini clearly said that cancelling orders is not an option and we know that he pulls the strings,not Giggino u’ bibitaro!
    Tempest will happen,on both sides of the politics they are aware it has too.And you cannot underestimate Finmeccanica lobbying.

    https://youtu.be/pSAyRWBb-_s

    edi_right_round
    Participant

    Yeah, just like Saudi Arabia did..or wait they didn’t build any from kits did they?

    Are you comparing yourself to the Saudies?Cmon,you have had a long experience of producing under license.
    Eurofighter was the right choice,EJet probably the 4th generation best engine would have come

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 226 total)