T-50 top fuselage composite panel quality check at ONPO “Tekhnologiya”
The panel from the photo seems to be 1 cm thick.
I recall DjCross when T-50 flew first saying that from panels thickness one could approximately give what kind of band radars the platform will be invisible.Can somebody confirm this and what would be the target?
Sorry if the assumption sounds silly
News still add some confusion.So seems the late pilots (rip) didnt eject?Thats weird at least.If im not wrong Phantoms have zero zero seats so maybe they were just trying to bring the Phantom to crash in international waters and eject in the last moments.
Is it known if plane was found in syrian or international waters?
I guess I didn’t read that sentence. I read the one saying that it went off their radar at 13nm, so I assumed that it could have gone at a lower altitude and not been seen from Turkish radars.
If the video above is true, why would Syrian AAA open fire on an aircraft that far away (would their fire-control radars even be able to lock on to a target that far away?), and onlookers at the beach would not have been able to see the engagement take place. All assuming the video shows what it claims to show.
Kapedan in some old Mig manuals there was a parameter called flight coefficent(koeficent fluturimi).For a given speed and height if there’s some sort or failure it gives how far it can fly in that state.In general it depends on plane aerodinamics but higher you are and more speed u have further you fly…if the phantom was low and fast dunno if it fell out of syrian waters
there is a video around made by some guys at a beach and suddenly you hear AAA fire.
first some slower burst and then an intense one.Do the sirians have 37mm or 57mm deployed there?i heard chicoms have made some sort of network firing device for them,then they also have a lot of Shilkas what would justify the fast bursts in the video
At this time, the threat of firing even one or two Scuds on turkish soil is enough to ruin the entire turkish tourist season. That’s a lot of billion âŽâŽâŽs and $$$s. Noone in Turkey is that stupid.
somehow true.it always surprised me how obsolete and without care was the turkish air defense regarding missiles if we compare it with the trend not even with Greece or ever Cyprus.
Havaarla Jh-7 maybe little underpowered by i dont think Al-21 on Su-24 offer better range with same load than Licensed Speys on the Jh7.
hi guys sorry for off topic question.
im kindly asking for some info about the first production examples of F-7 in early 70s.I think they were exported just to Albania and Tanzania.From a former pilot of AAF who did the type qualification in PRC at the time i know that there were quite some markings in chassis and places in cyrillic.Is there any chance that before producing them from raw materials they worked on russian kits?Is there any public info about this?i think Deino mentioned this possibility some time ago
Yeah, i don’t doubt that PAK FA will be able to supercruise just fine, but i just don’t understand the need of having such a huge afterburner. Its max speed is limited to Mach 2, so if it will be able to cruse at lets say 1.5 Mach and 11.5 ToT, what is the point of 6.5 ToT on top of that to make it go Mach 2? Of course, the speed/power ratio is not proportional at all and maybe PAK FA does need around 18 tons to go up to mach 2, but it just strikes me odd that F-22 with roughly same numbers in terms of full thrust go 2.4+ Mach.
Then again, maybe 18 tons =/= Mach 2. Maybe PAK FA just needs 15 or 16 tons to get up to Mach 2. So engine is actually oversized thrust wise in terms of what speed the airframe is able to go to. Who knows. ð
All interesting questions.there used to be 2 well informed guys here RSM55 and Kilcoo,,,they would have said smth.
One thing comes to my mind.The huge thrust on Ab is because of the perspective of PAK DA using same engines.About top speed maybe to avoid peel off issues caused by high temp and maybe also the fact its gonna have a blocker in the inlet
When did is say the should fit D-30F into PAK FA? I said it reminds me of it, it has one massive afterburner. Now, ratio wise Al-31F (standard one for Su-27) and D-30 are rather alike, and ratio is slightly lower on izd 30 it seems, yet, it doesn’t make much sense to have massive afterburner in PAK FA. Figure in F119 is shifted in other direction, as much trust as possible without afterburner.
Ok i got you wrong sorry.I see what you mean but if what PiBu reports 11.5 tons on maks. is quite good.If we consider that with 12.5 tons(forsazh) and an aiframe not so focused on supercruise the Flanker got past M 2.3 than it should be pretty capable of supercruising around 1.5-1.6.
Well mine is just an uneducated guess but once you have that dry thrust i dont see them pulling often the forsazh handle
Well, 15 bucks wasted. The article didn’t reveal anything new at all. It has been hinted in the past that cracks has been discovered on T-50-1, and hence the reason it is not flying. “is believed to have ceased”. It has, but it doesn’t mean T-50-1 won’t fly ever again.
Izd 30 is starting to reminds me of D-30F….Also, sensor on the underside of the nose is not part of KS-U.
Berkut reminding on power output i suppose ,since i think D-30F6 would be quite big for the PakFa…and old tech too without mentioning the fact it requires some complicated inlet solution
niiice …is it the angle or those engines look different?maybe the famous type 30?
EDI,ur name is familiar to me,,u must be an Albanian ð
Doesnt matter at all,try not to spam and back up your claims in these board of knowledgeable ppl
Now what i wanna see is Kazakstan ordering some Su-35S.
They should be able to get a loan from Russia these days..
Sir with actual gas prices and the revenues they get from it i think they dont need the loan just to make up their mind
That’s an interesting note, since it would “confirm” a report I was just translating: Following this there were alltogether 39 J-7 (w.o. any additional letter) produced: at least 15 in a first pre-serial prototype-block (maybe built from knock-down kits (:confused: here I’m quite unsure !??) + 23 more of which 12 were later delivered to Albania.
After this the PLAAF requested several modifications, improvements, of which 6 were choosen to be incorporated into the next block … finally only 4 modifications were added to the serie and this version is/was called J-7I = J-7A. However all 34 aircraft (block 01-02) were rejected because of quality issues and only from Block 03 on they were delivered to PLAAF units (the 3. Test Regt. at the FTTC and one regiment within the 7. Division. Certification was granted in April 1975, however additional delays, problems until block 06 & 07 manufactured from June 1978 on. Serial production of this version ended 1981 after altogether 188 Maschinen (with 187 ausgeliefert incl.40 as “military aid” to North-Korea).
Deino
Deino they used them as much as they could and for an isolated country hadnt many support means.However they were reliable i think,lost just two of them,one that stalled during some maneuvers and the second had a bird ingestion while taking of.
the only problem they suffered was with engines but they bought some from Germany Nva stocks.
they also kept original bort numbers since 1973,from 201 to 212.maybe u find smth.
also they were capable of carrying only 2 Aam
Hi.As you know Albania and Tanzania took the first export F-7A.
We had just a squadron.Some of the former pilots that originally were in PRC for type qualification say that planes we had had in internals cyrillic markings so they say that either it was built on soviet kits or they gave us original soviet F-13s