In my experience, they are very different.

Obviously this is not applicable to everyone, but by and by large the French are probably a bit stronger on theoreticals, but have a harder time coping with change.

As in, the French will do better if the plan works… if the plan goes to crap, then the British will tend to shine.

Lol reminds me of Fred Thompson on “The hunt for the red october” when he said “Russians dont even **** out without a plan” lol it wasnt about french engineers though

Paralay why the difference on Y specific weight of fuel?Dont they use the same fuel in Us and Russia.
i remember an old Mig21 manual where was written it used a Y 0,83 specific weight kerosene

some very clear shots of the Mig31 intakes,maybe T-50 has the same bumps/ramps

copyright Vitali Kuzmin

How does the combat range of the Su-15 compare to the EE Lightning? I don’t think there’s much of a difference – that is to say, not great…

Great aircraft, one of my favourite Soviet aircraft. Let’s not forget all the aircraft it downed:

1978 KAL B707
1981 Argentine Canadair CL-44
1982 KAL B747

Heard it had a respectable 900km radius bit higher than EEL

28+12 new Su-30 for RuAF ?
http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20110718/165261909.html

Irkutsk is making the Su-30M2 type correct ?

If im not wrong they make the MKI

Compare to the Su-30 MKI, which has 12-14 missile carriage capability, and a 3000 km range without IFR (max, with 4 missiles).

.

Teer can you confirm the 3k range with 4 missiles?All figures around are 1200 km with 6 missiles for Flankers.

Can u say smth more about the argument?

Is there any data on what speed PAK-FA can maintain on mil. thrust ?

Well if we take the 15% as a constant increase in maximal and forsazh thrust it should be at the level of Eurofighter at least.