dark light

Petros

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 261 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hellenic Navy (News & Views). #2062181
    Petros
    Participant

    with their sthealthy design, small size and especialy the RAM CIWS, they are very dificult targets inside the Aigaian sea enviroment. I wonder when (and if) the other CIWS-free older missile boats (LA COMBATTANTE III, IIIb, IIA ) will get such a crucial system. Maybe the transfusion of PHALANX’s from the ‘S’ Frigates and the replacement of them with RAMs during their modernization programm would be the best solution…

    in reply to: The Phasing out of the S-3 Viking – A good or bad thing? #2063014
    Petros
    Participant

    It is a bad thing for aviation enthusiasts because a unique looking bird will disappear from the skies.
    Back in the seventies it was even considered as a replacement for the German Breguet Atlantics:

    As far as I know HAF and Hellenic Navy have been interested about the perspective of acquiring a number of S-3 as replacement of the P-3Bs among other solutions…

    in reply to: Helicopter Training Accident video #2589717
    Petros
    Participant

    😮 😮
    What the hell happened??? It must be the most ridiculous accident ever!

    in reply to: Mirage F2 and F3 #2589730
    Petros
    Participant

    Well if the beauty and the elegance of the airframe was the criterion, surely Dassault designs were always at the first place!

    in reply to: Mirage F2 and F3 #2590603
    Petros
    Participant

    sorry Archibaal just seen it!

    in reply to: Mirage F2 and F3 #2590632
    Petros
    Participant

    that Megamirage looks like a delta-wing, single vertical stabilizer Foxbat 🙂

    in reply to: Hellenic Navy (News & Views). #2063607
    Petros
    Participant

    any info about when the 4 Type 209/1100 ‘s and the 209/1200 that won’t get upgrade (is it “Poseidon” ?) are going to retire from service?

    in reply to: Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests #2593905
    Petros
    Participant

    he he, you never know Don Chan!!!

    in reply to: Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests #2593961
    Petros
    Participant

    I always wondered about the risk that run the user of a LASER weapon. I’m sure that in near future there are going to be developed Laser counter measures (LCM) (if they don’t exist even nowdays…) like Laser reflectors for ex. that could reflect the Light back to its source… So if you now that there is even a slight possibility that your target could be equiped with that kind of LCM, are you going to risk a laser shot on it?

    in reply to: AIM-9X eyed as sub-launched SAM #1819239
    Petros
    Participant

    Successful Test of an AIM-9X Missile from Submarine Raytheon Company Tue, 7 Feb 2006, 22:58

    TEWKSBURY: A Raytheon-led team successfully launched an AIM-9X from a stationary, vertical platform last November. The missile successfully locked on after launch and hit its target in a test of its potential launch from a submarine. The test was conducted for the Naval Sea Systems Command at the U.S. Army’s McGregor Test Range in New Mexico Nov. 19, 2005. A successful test firing matures the technology that will provide the Navy with a new capability when the Joint Battlespace is near the coast at a fraction of the cost of developing a new weapon system. The new system is an existing launch capability married to a proven weapon fired from a submarine at periscope depth. “This is very exciting,” said Dan Smith, president of Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems. “In partnering with the Navy and Northrop Grumman, our team has been able to take an already proven off-the-shelf weapon, make software modifications, use existing launch technology, and give the combatant commander another option in the coastal Joint Battlespace. “The implications of this first phase test are far-reaching. It provides the Navy with a low-cost solution with a high-impact capability in its approach to littoral warfare without having to go through a costly and lengthy R&D process.” Mark Russell, vice president of Raytheon IDS engineering, said that the recent test launch also represents a significant step toward enabling the submarine force to strike targets with surprise from shallower coastal waters. Now, in addition to MK-48 torpedo and the Tomahawk cruise missile, submarine forces will have the option of another weapon system making them a more versatile player in the integrated battlespace. “Successfully demonstrating the AIM-9X lock-on-after-launch mode from a vertical orientation launch is a major step toward providing our submariners with an unprecedented offensive and defensive capability,” said Brock McCaman, vice president of Raytheon Missile Systems Air-to-Air Product Line. “It’s another example of the tactical flexibility of this proven weapon system.” “This test is the first step toward an AIM-9X missile being launched vertically from a submarine,” said John Cochran, the Raytheon IDS program manager. “Ultimately, the missile will be encased in a launch capsule. When the capsule broaches the surface, the missile will launch and then acquire and engage its target.” For this test, the missile was launched from a stationary, vertically- oriented U.S. Army XM-85 Chaparral launcher. The AIM-9X missile successfully acquired and destroyed a slow moving helicopter drone target with a direct hit. AIM-9X missiles are normally launched from fighter aircraft. “This non-traditional launch of the AIM-9X provides the submarine force with an important element toward having the capability to strike enemy patrol aircraft, helicopters, and high speed patrol boats,” said Eldon Vita, the Missile Subsystem program manager for Raytheon Missile Systems. “It provides combatant commanders with another option in support of interdiction, special operations, battlespace preparation, forced entry, anti-access, and area denial.” The test is part of a multi-year risk retirement program that may lead to full scale development. In addition to testing upgraded missile guidance and target acquisition software, the firing demonstrated the potential for underwater vertical launch from a capsule and the missile’s ability to quickly reach stable flight when starting from a stationary platform. Based in Tewksbury, Mass., Integrated Defense Systems is Raytheon’s leader in Joint Battlespace Integration. With a strong international and domestic customer base, including the U.S. Missile Defense Agency and the U.S. armed forces, Integrated Defense Systems provides a wide spectrum of integrated air and missile defense and naval and maritime warfighting solutions. Raytheon Company, with 2005 sales of $21.9 billion, is an industry leader in defense and government electronics, space, information technology, technical services, and business and special mission aircraft. With headquarters in Waltham, Mass., Raytheon employs 80,000 people worldwide.

    Raython release.

    in reply to: SAM Systems #1819267
    Petros
    Participant

    Basicaly yes, aulthough each custumer could select deferent “modes” of the system.
    here some links:

    http://www.mbda.net/site/FO/scripts/siteFO_contenu.php?lang=EN&noeu_id=91
    http://www.singaporerapier.com/meminfo.html

    and a MBDA’s brochure:
    http://www.mbda.net/site/doc_imp/rapier_b1x.pdf

    in reply to: New Hellenic Air Force Videos #2594521
    Petros
    Participant

    New HAF video about archangel on HAF site…

    http://www.haf.gr/media/archangel_clip.wmv

    in reply to: SAM Systems #1819335
    Petros
    Participant

    What’s the difference between Rapier C and JERNAS?

    JERNAS is the export name for the Rapier FSC (Field Standard C) air defence system, it is based on the Rapier Mk 2 missile and launcher which is in service with the British Army and RAF, the Blindfire tracking radar and the Dagger surveillance radar

    in reply to: War with Iran, are we there yet? :( #2595215
    Petros
    Participant

    …and how deep is the facilities.

    I think that’s the main concern. Air defence would not be a problem for US. (that’s not the case with IAF though..)

    in reply to: War with Iran, are we there yet? :( #2595229
    Petros
    Participant

    A war of UN against Iran would initiate a war with all tha arabic world. No one wishes that! From the other hand how effective would be an airstrike against the nuclear facilities of Iran?

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 261 total)