MODERNISATION OF THE INDIAN AIR FORCE – SEVENTH REPORT STANDING COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE
1999-2000
THIRTEENTH LOK SABHA
MINISTRY OF DEFENCEPresented to Lok Sabha on 18 December, 2000. Laid in Rajya Sabha on 18 December, 2000
1. Acquisition of Modern War Planes to maintain a Combat Force Level
22. The Ministry of Defence have stated that there is going to be a planned induction of various aircraft during the Current, Tenth and Eleventh Five Years Defence Plans. The projection for acquisition takes into account what is already in the pipeline in terms of firm proposals or for which nearly firm proposals have been formulated in Air Headquarters. The on-going induction plan includes the induction of Squadrons of SU-30, MK-I aircraft and also induction later on by licenced production. Procurement of Mirage-2000 dash-5 aircraft is planned. It is stated that a formal proposal for acquisition of a few squadron of Mirage-2000-5 in the 10th and 11th plan has been submitted to the Ministry of Defence. Indigeneous production of Jaguar aircraft by HAL in the Tenth Plan also will slow down the process of reduction in force levels. In addition, acquisition of additional MiG-21 or MiG-29 to maintain the force level at an acceptable level is also under consideration at Air Headquarters.
28. The Committee also note that, as licenced production route is to be followed for acquisitions such as SU-30, Mirage, MiGs and the Advanced Jet Trainer and that the transfer of technology and development of the production line will require perspective planning, the Committee hope that there are no delays once the production and maintenance of the aircraft comes into Indian hands. The Committee hope that finances will be committed in the budget year-wise to accommodate immediate payment, debt repayment and to put up the infrastructure required to manufacture of various types of aircraft in India.
This report was presented in the Indian Parliament and the some of the data was sourced from the Indian MoD.



A few pictures of Bort 709.
«Арбалет» против ракет
Корпорация «Фазотрон-НИИР» разработала радары для систем защиты от управляемых ракет. По словам ее генерального директора – генерального конструктора корпорации Анатолия Канащенкова, радары «Копье-Д» и «Арбалет-Д», работающие в дециметровом диапазоне, можно ставить на самолеты, вертолеты и другие носители. В частности, «Арбалет-Д» может предупреждать экипаж вертолета о приближении ракет типа «Стингер» и вырабатывать сигнал к осуществлению ответных мер по применению средств противоракетной защиты. РЛС «Арбалет-Д» состоит из моноблока и четырех плоских антенн, обеспечивающих круговой обзор пространства. Новыми радарами «Фазатрона-НИИР» заинтересовались не только ВВС России, но и другие рода войск.
http://www.redstar.ru/2004/05/15_05/n.html

More or less the same information which you have posted.
НОВЫЕ РАДАРЫ
Корпорация “Фазотрон-НИИР” (Москва) разработала авиационные и наземные радары для предупреждения о приближении к защищаемому аппарату управляемых ракет. Радары дециметрового диапазона “Копье-Д” и “Арбалет-Д” являются радарами защиты, которые можно ставить на самолеты, вертолеты и другие носители. Радары позволяют давать своевременную информацию для применения средств противоракетной защиты. “Арбалет-Д” может предупреждать экипаж вертолета о приближении ракет типа “Стингер” и вырабатывать сигнал к осуществлению ответных мер. РЛС “Арбалет-Д” состоит из моноблока и четырех плоских антенн, обеспечивающих круговой обзор пространства. Новыми радарами “Фазотрона-НИИР” заинтересовались не только ВВС России, но другие рода войск.
http://nvo.ng.ru/printed/armament/2004-05-14/6_news.html
Other reference :
http://www.redstar.ru/2004/06/11_06/n.html
In what way would these radars differ from the N012 and which flankers would be the first to receive them ?
First U.S. Test of Arrow Missile Defense System Goes ‘Beautifully’
The skies over the California coastline witnessed history last week, as the U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and the Israeli Missile Defense Organization (IMDO) successfully conducted the first “real-world” test of the Arrow Weapons System (AWS) interceptor, a joint program between the U.S. and Israel to develop a regional ballistic missile defense system. IMDO Director Arieh Herzog singularly described the test as “beautiful,” noting that the test highlighted four areas of success: governmental and industrial cooperation, logistical support, systems integration and “an important performance milestone [for the AWS.]”
Accepting an offer originally proposed in 2001 by the U.S. MDA, a joint U.S.-Israel team of military operators and industry contractors transported an entire Arrow 2 launch system including a ‘Green Pine’ early-warning and fire-control radar, a ‘Hazelnut Tree’ launch control center and a ‘Citron Tree’ battle management/command and control (BMC2) complex to the U.S. Navy’s Naval Air Weapons Station and Pacific Missile Test Center at Point Mugu, California. Although it took nearly three years to prepare and plan for the test carried out on July 29, the actual process of moving the equipment and personnel from Israel required less than six months.
The test, designed to reflect an operational missile defense system as closely as possible, was operated entirely by the same Israeli Air Force personnel who normally operate Israel’s two operational Arrow batteries. Given little information about the threat, the IDF/AF crew, operating within the BMC2 complex on the oceanfront, tracked an incoming SCUD ballistic missile surrogate and launched a single Arrow 2 interceptor missile from the launcher located 60 miles off the coast on San Nicolas Island. The Arrow missile arced into the sky, guided by telemetry from the ‘Green Pine’ radar and computer guidance from the ‘Citron Tree’ BMC2 facility until the interceptor kill vehicle (IKV) separated from the booster stage, at which time the on-board electro-optical guidance sensor acquired the inbound missile despite a “very small [data] error during the hand-over,” according to Boaz Levy, Israel Aircaft Industries’ Arrow Program Director.
The IKV continued towards the target missile, successfully destroying the incoming missile with the Arrow’s fragmentation warhead, followed milliseconds later by a body-to-body impact of the Arrow kill vehicle and the remnants of the simulated SCUD surrogate missile.
This marks the sixth successful test of the complete Arrow system, but the first test conducted outside of Israel in order to capitalize upon the larger test ranges afforded by the geography of the United States. The previous six system-wide tests conducted in Israel (including a 1997 test in which the Arrow warhead failed in a final stage of the intercept process), have been hampered by airspace limitations, forcing the system components to be located in much closer proximity than in real-world conditions and relying upon sub-scale target missiles to be launched from F-15 fighter jets, rather than employing a true ballistic flight path.
Point Mugu, which has been used for more than 50 years by the U.S. Navy to conduct missile tests, afforded a significantly larger test range and the ability to test against a true ‘SCUD-type’ ballistic missile. (Reports that the test employed a captured Iraqi SCUD-C missile have proven untrue, however no official information has been provided as to the source of the “simulated SCUD” used in the test.)
Although IMDO Director Herzog remains tight-lipped about the details of future tests, it is clear that at least one more test of the full system will be conducted at Point Mugu before the end of 2004.
Initiated in 1988 as a joint venture between the United States and Israel to develop an Anti-Tactical Ballistic Missile System (ATBMS), with the first flight occurring in 1990. The substantially-improved and significantly more-capable Arrow 2 program took shape following the Iraqi SCUD attacks against Israel during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm in 1990 and 1991. The first two Arrow batteries became operational outside of the cities of Tel Aviv and Hadera in early 2000 and 2002, respectively. To date, Israel and the United States have equally split the approximately $1.3 billion cost of the Arrow 2 Development Program, according to Commander Guy Aviram, IDF, Arrow Liason Officer at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C.
The Arrow program is not only a joint venture between the governments of the United States and Israel, but also the aerospace industries of the two nations. While Israel Aircraft Industries serves as the prime contractor, with Israeli firms Elta and Tadiran providing the radar and battle management systems, respectively, Boeing and a host of U.S.-based sub-contractors are providing key components of the most recent Arrow variants, known as A2-vM4 and A2-vM5. However, as stipulated in the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Israel and the U.S. in 1986, no complete missiles or control systems are produced within the United States for shipment to Israel.
Currently, work is underway on the Arrow System Improvement Program (ASIP), a joint effort of the IMDO and the U.S. MDA, as well as IAI and Boeing aimed at providing an evolving capability for the AWS and better systems integration in the future. Having demonstrated the capability of working side-by-side with Israel’s short-range Patriot missile systems and the advanced U.S. Army Patriot PAC-3 batteries during recent Juniper Cobra exercises and during the major combat portion of Operation Iraqi Freedom. According to IMDO Director Herzog, Israel currently plans on fusing the Arrow 2 systems and the shorter-range IDF Patriot PAC-2/GEM+ together with the IDF’s existing national aerospace monitoring systems, to provide a comprehensive and centralized air-defense system, rather than coordinating the actions of individual batteries of Arrow interceptors, separate Patriot missile units and IAF pilots. Herzog envisions a three-tiered system, with Arrow providing defense against MRBMs from Syria and Iran, Patriot providing defense against Short-Range Ballistic Missiles and the Mobile Tactical High-Energy Laser (MTHEL) to protect communities against Katyusha and Qassam rockets.
For the foreseeable future, Israel is likely to be the only nation to field the Arrow Weapons System, although developmental data and operational lessons have played some role in current U.S. efforts aimed at providing National Missile Defense and on the Navy’s ship-based Theater-Wide missile defense system. Although India purchased a ‘Green Pine’ radar from Elta in 2001 and has expressed interest in deploying its own battery of Arrow interceptor missiles, U.S. concerns regarding compliance with the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR, an international agreement limiting the proliferation of ballistic missile technology, have effectively halted such plans for the time being.
A diagram of the July 29, 2004 test, off Point Mugu.

An Israeli Arrow 2 anti-ballistic interceptor lifts-off from San Nicolas Island, Calif. during a test conducted by the Israeli MDO and the U.S. MDA on July 29, 2004.

These models have been created by Michael Pavlov .
Erez and Mike Echo, you will love this.
AL-41 on the MFI.
Raytheon Tests SilentEyes(TM) Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle at Edwards AFB
TUCSON, Ariz., Aug. 3 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Raytheon Company demonstrated its SilentEyes(TM) Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) by ejecting it from an MQ-9 Predator pylon-mounted canister during tests at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.
The tests, conducted in May and June, demonstrated the first capability toward removing a human from harm’s way with a low-cost UAV, while delivering the same effectiveness. SilentEyes is designed to operate in close proximity to a potential target to collect clear images so an operator can make incontestable combat identification and target confirmation.
The test demonstration was managed by the U.S. Air Force Aeronautical Systems Center. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. supported the flight testing. For the tests, SilentEyes was loaded in a canister magazine similar to the Raytheon AN/ALE-50 Towed Decoy launcher and was launched by the MQ-9 flight crew from the Predator Ground Control Station. Upon release, SilentEyes deployed its wings, flew autonomously and transmitted target images with its data link through the MQ-9 data link to the ground control station for video display and processing. SilentEyes was commanded via the MQ-9 to alternate waypoints and target locations. SilentEyes was configured with the Cloud Cap Technology Piccolo Plus flight computer and Raytheon’s MicroLight (TM) data link.
Raytheon’s SilentEyes is a transformational system that can provide revolutionary or asymmetric advantages to the war fighter. SilentEyes has been designed to be affordable and can be quickly customized to perform a variety of missions.
SilentEyes’ capabilities include performing confirmation identification for both stationary and moving targets, reducing the time to find, fix, track, target, engage and assess targets and to execute attack. The capability also will provide confirmatory identification when no manned assets have access to denied areas and will complement sensors on tactical manned and unmanned platforms with autonomous, air-launched sensors.
Spiral development of technology and technology spin-on can expand SilentEyes’ capabilities to address other areas in the find-fix-track-target- engage-assess loop. Spiral development could include scaling and integrating SilentEyes with various payloads for deployment off the full range of strike aircraft, UAVs and Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles.
Raytheon developed and integrated emergent technologies into the SilentEyes air vehicle design and demonstrated the air vehicle in mission- relevant scenarios within nine months of contract award. These demonstrations showed that Raytheon could provide this capability for less than $15,000 per unit.