dark light

Jai

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 616 through 628 (of 628 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gripen & LCA/J-10 #2684306
    Jai
    Participant

    Gripen would still have a better radar AMSAR (2010 say?)

    Actually the radar mentioned in the 2010-MLU proposal for Gripen is the NORA AESA radar.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2672527
    Jai
    Participant

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4779839&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4779840&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4779841&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4780154&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4780155&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4780156&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4780157&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4780177&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4780178&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2672534
    Jai
    Participant

    Saras first flight TV caps.

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4779712&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4779710&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4779711&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4779836&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4779837&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

    in reply to: A-50 SRDLO Video – Comments needed #2677923
    Jai
    Participant

    Shkval1 and Vympel, thanks for the answer. However, I have one more question to ask. Towards the end of the video, you will find that in the audience a gent with a turban is sitting in the crowd, and he seems to be from India. Could you think of a reason to explain what he could be doing in what seems to be a totally Russian crowd, because it does not seem that he is a part of a delegation.

    In the meantime, a few KnAAPO PR videos for everybody. Most videos are above 25 MB.

    http://www.redpilot.com/misc/AVSEQ01.DAT

    http://www.redpilot.com/misc/AVSEQ02.DAT

    http://www.redpilot.com/misc/AVSEQ03.DAT

    http://www.redpilot.com/misc/AVSEQ04.DAT

    http://www.redpilot.com/misc/AVSEQ05.DAT

    in reply to: M2K or Mig-29 for India? #2679624
    Jai
    Participant

    In the light of this, its rather strange that IAF sent in an evaluation team for SMT. :confused: But, perhaps there is an alternative explanation and the two may not b linked??? IAF mayb interested in upgrading their existing Mig-29 fleet to SMT standards, since it’d b somewhat illogical/expenisve to maintain 2 almost different a/c, i.e. Mig-29 for IAF and Mig-29K for IN.

    The evaluation team was in Russia to evaluate the SMT so as to decide upon the option of upgrading the existing IAF MiG-29 to the SMT standard, not to buy new SMT airframes.

    in reply to: N011M Bars info #2684559
    Jai
    Participant

    Hi,

    It also appears that plans to replace the Russian signal processor with an Indian one were shelved. The data processor will be replaced, but not the signal processor.

    Paul, are you certain that there were plans to eventually replace the Russian PSP with an Indian PSP, because the Indian agency which has developed avionics for the MKI had expressed it’s inability to deliver the PSP on time, before the avionics program had been initiated. The original program to develop the indigenous avionics for the MKI, under the name ‘Project Vetrivale’, included plans to make the Mission computer, Display processor, Radar computer, the PSP, RWR, IFF, Radar Altimeter and the Secure communication set INCOM. But, the revised plan deleted the indigenous development of the PSP. See the following link,

    Lok Sabha – PAC report

    The Ministry decided to develop eight avionics equipment indigenously as part of the joint development programme for SU-30 MKI. These included, Mission Computer (MC), Display Processor (DP), Radar Computer (RC), Programmable Signal Processor (PSP), Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Identification Friend or Foe (IFF), Radio Altimeter and INCOM (Secure) Radio set.

    According to Audit , the delegation during their visit to ADE/ASIEO in February-March 1996 held extensive discussions with DRDO and the technical specifications of the sub-systems to be developed were finalised and their delivery schedules arrived at. The Ministry of Defence granted the formal approval to the Project `Vetrivale’ in December 1997 at a cost of Rs. 100 crore. Subsequently, the cost of the Project was reduced to Rs. 76.8 crore due to removal of PSP from the project on account of inability expressed by DRDO to develop it in time.

    As regards PSP, the Committee desired to know the reasons for which LRDE failed to develop the item initially entrusted to them and was subsequently reverted to the manufacturer. According to the Ministry, LRDE expressed their inability to develop the system within the envisaged time frame, especially in view of the non-finalisation of technical specification by the manufacturer. It was stated that since the radar itself, of which PSP is a component, was under development in the manufacturer country, the technical specifications would have taken considerable time to finalise. The Committee were informed that the contractual negotiations had been concluded with the manufacturer and they would be supplying the PSP in time to meet the revised delivery schedule of the aircraft.

    An updated article about the Vetrivale project also excludes any mention of the PSP.

    The core avionics designed by the Bangalore-based Defence Avionics Research Establishment (DARE) consists of Mission Computers, Display Processors and Radar computers which are now manufactured by HAL’S Hyderabad Division. The other DARE product Tarang RWR which is manufactured by BEL at its Bangalore facility, alerts the pilot to all surrounding “threats” such as radar-controlled guns and missiles for initiating evasive action or counter-measures. Tarang which was originally designed for the MiG-21bis modernisation programme is now a standard fitment in most of IAF aircraft. The integrated communication equipment and radar altimeters are of HAL’s own design, already well proven in other aircraft applications. The expected size of the Su-30MKI fleet of IAF is around 180 aircraft. A very beneficial effect of this approach, in the IAF entrusting all of the core avionics to a single development agency, is that DRDO has been able to design the 3 on-board computers with maximum commonality of hardware and software amongst them using a modular approach to design. This obviously results in major cost and time savings in development; it also benefits the user in maintenance and spares inventories. In fact the DRDO has gone a step further and come out with a new design of the Core Avionics Computer (CAC) which can be used with a single module adaptation across many other aircraft platforms. Thus the CAC which is derived from the computers designed for the Su-30MKI will now be the centre piece of the avionics upgrades for the MiG-27 and Jaguar aircraft as well. The CAC was demonstrated by DRDO at the Aero India exhibition at Yelahanka and attracted a good deal of international attention. Taken together with the systems already developed indigenously for the LCA (such as the Digital Flight Control Computer and HUD), clearly Indian avionics have a significant export potential in the burgeoning global market for avionics modernisation.

    BTW, another aspect of the MKI-3 is integration with the LDP.

    in reply to: Pictures : Belenko defection #2685975
    Jai
    Participant

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_8.jpg

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_9.jpg

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_10.jpg

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_11.jpg

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_14.jpg

    ————————————————————————–

    All images from :

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/

    in reply to: Pictures : Belenko defection #2685979
    Jai
    Participant

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_4.jpg

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_6.jpg

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_7.jpg

    http://www.airforce.ru/articles/MiG-25_Japan/MiG-25_5.jpg

    in reply to: What is the status of the Kaveri engine? #2687144
    Jai
    Participant

    The AL-55 Engine

    http://www.maks.ru/expo/380/images/prod_598_600.jpg

    Saturn AL-55 is a small-size by-pass gas-turbine engine available with afterburner or without afterburner versions, with vectored thrust. The engine was developed in a process of modeling of the flow path of Saturn AL-31F by-pass turbojet engine.Saturn AL-55 is of modular design. It is highly available, easy to maintain engine featuring high performance ratings, high service life (about 2000 hours) and low weight – 355 kg. The engine is equipped with advanced automatic control system of the latest electron and mechanical concept.

    http://www.maks.ru/expo/380/prod_598.htm#

    ————————————————————————

    TTL = Total Technical Life = Service life ?

    in reply to: Great site with excellent MiG-29/Su-27 pics #2687698
    Jai
    Participant
    in reply to: What is the status of the Kaveri engine? #2687720
    Jai
    Participant

    Here ya go google.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Aircraft/Articles/IJT-01.jpg

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Aircraft/Articles/IJT-02.jpg

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Aircraft/Articles/IJT-03.jpg

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Aircraft/Articles/IJT-04.jpg

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Aircraft/Articles/IJT-05.jpg

    in reply to: American fighter prefix #2688314
    Jai
    Participant

    F-20

    For the skipped F-19 designation, what I have read is that it was skipped on a request from the manufacturer of the F-5G Tigershark, to the USAF, so that they could obtain ‘new’ series designation which could be used more effectively for PR purposes. But, neither Chuck Yeager’s services nor the ‘new’ series designation proved to be any good for the sales of the -20.

    in reply to: Russia/India "MTA" (Il-214) project #2688395
    Jai
    Participant

    Interview of Aleksey Fedorov, director of Irkut Corporation

    Interview: Aleksey Fedorov, General Director of the Irkut Aircraft Building Corporation

    – How do you plan to use the money received from the IPO?

    – Most of all we are investing in the purchase of the Yakovlev OKB with the money attracted as a result of the IPO. Moreover, we will be investing in programs that interest us. Basically, these projects are the same as the Yakovlev OKB, and most of all the creation of the Yak-130 training airplane. Our interest in the design bureau and the Yak-130 are generally one of the main motives of the IPO.

    We also have other prospective projects which require investments – these are the multirole transport airplane program and the development of unmanned aerial systems. It is possible some part of the funds will be used for replenishment of revolving funds for the purpose of the fulfillment of current contracts. We also need resources for the renovation of basic funds.

    – While carrying out the delivery and licensing contract for the Su-30MKI, Irkut has established close ties with the Indian aviation industry. In the event of the activation of the MTA (the multirole transport airplane for the Russian and Indian air forces) these ties will receive an additional push. Will Irkut in connection with this have the ability to take part in the privatization of the Indian aircraft building concern HAL?

    – We already have expressed our interest in participating in the privatization of the HAL corporation, who for us is a most important strategic partner. Both the present Su-30MKI program and the future MTA project presume a large volume of cooperation, in which connection in the area not only of manufacturing, but also in the development of the equipment. For the time being plans for the privatization of HAL have no clear time framework, but in principle, Indian law permits the participation of foreign capital in such companies.

    – Do you expect competition for the right to obtain HAL shares?

    – HAL is an extremely attractive partner. The Indian marketplace is growing rapidly, the corporation itself is being developed dynamically, and it is seeing a growth in the volume of sales and technical equipment. Therefore, it is likely that not only Irkut has interest to be included in HAL’s capitalization. We are ready for the fact that we will have to fight for this right.

    Our cooperation right now is a two-way street. At the technological level (HAL) is a fully modern enterprise. For the time being we partly are ahead of them, for example in part of the production of titanium parts and a number of other technologies. But this gap will be overcome using the deployment of the Su-30MKI’s licensed production in India. In many technologies, for example in the part of the production of composite materials, HAL already today is at a good international level and is of interest as a source technologies. Even within the framework of the current contracts we concede that HAL can be an Irkut subcontractor.

    link

Viewing 13 posts - 616 through 628 (of 628 total)