Doc,
Shouldn’t you change your callsign then? :diablo:
Cees
I was thinking about the MacRoberts Reply at the time 😉
Me, grinning like a school boy, in NX611, last autumn.
DS
Well I do sincerely hope that they won’t make us stand outside in the rain and peer in through the window! 😀
LOL No, I meant get inside the planes! 😀
East Kirkby first sounds an excellent idea. Burgers, teas and Lancasters all round! 🙂
I for one can’t afford to get any rounder, or I won’t fit in the turrets :rolleyes: ! For that matter, am I right in thinking we will get a chance to see inside the Flight?
DS
The Great 4 Lancs in A Day Challenge
I think I’ll give Duxford a miss, as I really want to get a good view of NX611 on the move. I went up there last year for a taxi ride – the morning when I was on the ride was glorious, but watching in the afternoon it was pouring down, and freezing cold. If I gave the taxi run a miss, I am sure I could make it a 4 Lanc day. A record?
DS
Fantastic- can’t wait! I assume those going will also want to watch Just Jane in East Kirkby, then go on to Conningsby for the evening? I might even try to catch the RAF Hendon Lanc first thing in the morning as well! Getting in the Duxford Lanc might be a bit too much….. 🙂
DS
Their non-VOP Day grub … .
..non-Very Old Person..? 😉
DS
Maybe the person in charge of food at Cosford should go and give some advice to their counter-part at Hendon as Cosford’s food was first class today.
The grub at East Kirkby is rather tasty, but very expensive. Mind you, they throw in a ride in a Lancaster for free.
DS
You pull the gear lever, then ease the plane forward.. 😉 Would the plane need to be taxied up to a ramp from which you would load the a/c, or did they do it manually in those days? Climb up a ladder with the goods, and the bulky, or heavy stuff went in the back of the plane? How high is that thing of the ground anyway, 20ft? 😮
T J
The load master would use a block and tackle – that ran between the arms holding the nose up – to lift it in. The weight distibution must have been very tricky – what with the take-off swing the last thing a pilot would need is for the nose to drop because it was unevenly balanced.
DS
DS
easy: triangle markings on tail = 1st Air Division
K in triangle = 379th BG
look up 379th BG codes and the only one possible is LF for the 526th BS
WA = 524th BS
FR = 525th BS
LF = 526th BS
FO = 527th BS😎
Martin
*Edit* – Skipper was faster (I lost again :rolleyes: )
Now you’ve explained it, I’m not so impressed!! 😉
Hmmm
interesting indeed – it’s a 379th BG 526th BS ship (1st AD, 8th AAF) –
Martin
I am very impressed at how accurately you have identified this a/c. What were your clues?
I would say it is a 2 engined machine. Obviously a prototype for the ‘Manchester’ version of the Fortress. Sort of reverse engineering. 🙂
DS
This may be pure scandal – in which case I may end up in The Tower – but I saw a program on this a while back where it was alleged that he took the controls from the pilot, whilst not being in full control of his facalties. As a newt.
DS
Link not working for me.
Moggy
Try: http://homepages.tesco.net/~stirling.project/ and you get a redirection, which itself did not seem to work, but click on the ‘click here’ !!
DS
edit: just tried it myself, and it seems that they have exceeded their bandwidth this hour! Try again in 1 hour!!!
Stirlings must be popular today 😎
Well, my late grandad was ground crew on Wellingtons, then Stirlings, then Lancasters, all with 149 Sqdn; I never ceased to be amazed at his sheer love of the Stirling, even over the obviously far better Lancaster. But for him, there was just something about it…he used to enjoy being stubbornly indifferent to seeing PA474 buzzing about over his head (Though really, I’m sure he loved it!) and I wish that there had been some Stirling for him to view during his lifetime. 🙁
For me it is the sheer ‘presence’ of the thing. Longer and taller than the Lanc, Stirlings were the biggest planes that most people in the RAF – outside of Coastal Command with its Sunderlands – had ever seen. They had plenty of faults – largely due to the restrictions placed on their design and the lack of a really good powerplant. But their solid build and high turn rates (even said to be able to out-turn a Hurricane?) won them a lot of supporters. And, as most often quoted, they were the first 4 engined heavy and specifically designed as such.
DocStirling
Stirling Replica(s)
[QUOTE=Dave Homewood]
There was a project some years back that was to build a full sized replica in Britain of a Stirling but I believe it went nowhere. What a shame. At least this Dutch museum has got further.
QUOTE]
Do you mean the Stirling Project? I am not sure that they will get to a full size replica, but they are making some progress!
http://www.stirlingproject.co.uk/
DS