dark light

Dr.Snufflebug

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 454 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206022
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    MS-21 designer had mentioned in an interview that PD-14 will give MS-21 1 % fuel advantage over PW1400

    I don’t think the PD-14 is any better than the PW, at least on the tech side it isn’t, with one generation older fan/compressor blades, a simpler design overall and so on. It may at least partially make up for that with its smaller diameter, lesser weight and lesser price, plus its (envisioned) superior serviceability (ease and cost).

    But that’s up for debate at a later point, it’s impossible to tell at this stage. The main thing is that if it really does live up to its projected specifications, it meets the criteria for being a modern and properly (even internationally) competitive engine for civilian aircraft in this class, despite not being absolutely cutting-edge, and that’s a big leap forward from pretty much everything Russia has built in the past and builds at present (the PowerJet doesn’t count). On the military side of things, Russia has stayed in the game rather well but its aerospace industry needs diversification of this kind.

    The PD-14 design is obviously a platform to improve upon in the future as well, with for example next-gen composite blades and what not, so there’s that angle to consider too. Russian aerospace needs this kind of stuff, it’s been stuck in a rut rehashing obsolete tech for far too long.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206066
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Technology wise how good is that MS-21 ?

    Somebody with more insight can probably fill you in on this properly, but the main thing about this plane is that it’s all supposed to be pretty much state-of-the-art, with a spanking fresh FBW system, unique composite wings and wingbox (made by AeroComposit using a cutting edge out-of-autoclave technique), modern geared turbofans that match the best in the world and so on and so forth.

    This unlike the Sukhoi SSJ or the Comac C919, that while somewhat competitive (at least the former has found some success here and there) most things about them is “legacy” and not up there with the latest stuff that for example Boeing and Airbus are doing.

    The plane that flew today is powered by Pratt & Whitneys:
    http://f22.ifotki.info/org/f90015d41640c87f99bfa1996634da461f8159278637714.jpg

    …which is all good, but if the PD-14 turns out to be what people are hoping for, then it’s a major achievement on Russia’s part that really adds to the significance of the MS-21, and finally something to boast about that is not military (first time in thirty years or something)…

    The PD-14 has been flying for quite a while on the Il-76LL and the second phase of flight testing was concluded a little while ago with good results from what I hear, so let’s keep some fingers crossed.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206078
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    The Yak-130 chase plane performed some mellow aerobatics to conclude today’s event, great:

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206085
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    It’s been a fairly good month for Russian aerospace.

    First proper flight tests of Ka-62
    Second phase of PD-14 in-flight testing completed
    First flight of MC-21-200

    Plus a lot of other smaller things here and there, such as the sneak peeks of the Altius and Orion drones.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2209198
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Only peripherally related to the RuAF but the engines are running hot and there have been some taxi tests now:
    https://sdelanounas.ru/i/d/3/d/d3d3Lmlya3V0LmNvbS91cGxvYWQvaW5mb3JtYXRpb25fc3lzdGVtXzEvMi81LzIvaXRlbV8yNTIxL2luZm9ybWF0aW9uX2l0ZW1zX3Byb3BlcnR5XzMzNTYuanBnP19faWQ9OTM0OTU=.jpg

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2132108
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Is there any worthwhile specs on this UAV?

    It’s powered by two aviation diesels (the model they showcased a few years ago had two German RED A03’s if I recall correctly but perhaps they’re domestic Russian ditto now), it’s supposed to have a 40k foot service ceiling and some 48h loiter time. That’s about it, I think.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2132223
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Such a cool pic, thx.

    PS.. and arrogantly overkill on S bend air-intakes :highly_amused:

    Many stealths! So low-observability! :stupid:

    Funny thing is, one of the early Yak-130 protoypes (43130, borts 296 & 01, that’s currently featured at the open air display at Monino) had a super stealthy chined forward fuselage too, plus these S-quacks of course. Much amazing. So steel marble.

    OK, I’ll stop.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2132229
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Three mittens:

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to208000/207791.jpg

    A Tupolev Tu-144 (s/n 77107) that’s been collecting dust (and lichen) since its last flight in 1985 was finally disassembled and moved out of the Kazan Aviation Institute backyard its been sitting in for these 32 years:

    It will be put together again and renovated to become an exhibit. Cool stuff.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2132276
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Looks like a Su-30MKM, albeit in a Sukhoi in house livery (pre-production prototype, is my guess).

    In that case, that’s the MAW-300 by SAAB.

    http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww293/binhbeo78/6337.jpg

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2140354
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    You heard it here first, post whatever as long as it was made in former Russia. Uganda MiG-21? Goes here! 😀 (i am actually convinced you didnt realize or read that it is Ukrainian so now you are attempting to row away)

    Funny that you mention that. Speaking of MiG-21’s in foreign service…

    https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C86sOo5d6Gw/WNSnH4flctI/AAAAAAABKvY/FvSCbVjQZW4ULQKd3DJ1ibMTUjXoNWbQgCLcB/s640/Chengdu%2BJ-7%2B3.jpg

    The last two brand new Chengdu J-7 trainers took to the skies last week over in China. That marks the end of MiG-21 production history, 1956-2017.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2140358
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Also, a nice pic of the SSJ:

    More Sukhoi SSJ… The Russians have now officially invaded the very capital of the European union:

    http://luchtzak-q41r3jh.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/image-768x513.jpeg

    Also, I just gotta ask, why the crazy armor protection on the Su-34? Isn’t it a bit schizophrenic somehow, I mean, surely nobody is seriously suggesting that a massive two-seat, twin-jet 30+ ton strike fighter be used in subsonic low-level combat in AAA-rich environments? Or are they?

    I just don’t get it. The plane’s basically a Strike Eagle-esque platform, with a very similar lineage (both are beefed-up two-seaters derived from purebred air superiority fighters), and Strike Eagle-esque things is what it should be doing. For that you don’t need a heavily armored cockpit. That’s some A-10/Su-25 sniffer stuff it’s got going on there, and a whole lot of unnecessary weight and complexity for that class of aircraft.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2163270
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Anybody has more info on this strange affair?

    From Kazakh news:
    http://newtimes.kz/silovoj-blok/item/47171-voennyj-vertolet-sel-na-trasse-aktobe-shymkent-video

    KazAF training flight, terrible snow storm with abysmal visbility, landed to ask some locals for directions.

    Has nothing to do with the RuAF.

    And before anyone says they should invest in GPS/GLONASS, from what the Kazakh MoD says the point of this training flight was to learn how to navigate the old-school way using landmarks, roads and what not. Then again that might just be some kind of excuse, but it does make sense.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2170449
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    They should make a black TU 160. Anyone good with photoshop, can you make a black one ?

    Take any photo of a Tu-160, then press ctrl-i. Voilá.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2172201
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    there must be orders of magnitude more bureaucrats than might reasonably be necessary to run a country of 140 million

    Yup, and that’s putting it mildly.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2172616
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    You really have to wonder about a country that is apparently ok with producing endless numbers of VIP aircraft for Putin and co.

    They’ve built five Il-96-300PU over the last 20 years, the first one started as a standard Il-96-300 that was rebuilt and the four others were built from scratch to presidential specs (EMP shielding, new comms systems, countermeasures and so on). Two of them have since been retired from presidential use, so they keep two today, just like Air Force One (two 747/VC-25s). Hardly “endless numbers” if you ask me.

    As for why they’re sticking to Ilyushin for those two presidential long-haulers despite cost ineffectiveness etc, I think the answer is pretty much a given. The 96 is the only available domestic model with that kind of range and loiter time, and they wanna keep it domestic in order to have full control over everything.

    The rest of the “Special Flight Squadron” uses a load of Tupolev 204/214s, some Il-96-300 standard models, a couple of Airbus 319s and two Sukhoi SSJ100s. Most of these are standard models with no particular “VIP” treatment, they’re used to ferry all kinds of people about (like those Russian diplomats+families who were expelled from the US this winter) and to support the ministries. First of all, Russia’s a vast place so even the most mundane domestic trip for the minister of education to inaugurate some kind of school for the deaf involves flying for a few hours, and they usually make sure to carry out multiple things while they’re at it so typically several ministries are in on each working trip and they all have their staff, security and support materials etc. Booking them in on regular public flights would be a pain in the *** most of the time. Second, the fleet is supposed to serve the president and his cabinet first of all, but is constantly in use by the rest of the ministries, the military, various deputies and has even been leased to the church (well, to the Patriarch, i.e. the Russian “Pope”..)

    And last but not least, they’re used to retrieve Russian citizens abroad if needed, and can be used for disaster relief etc. Of course MChS would be the goto place for that, but Rossiya can jump in too (and afaik most of their planes are civvies and not subject to any airspace restrictions)

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 454 total)