dark light

Dr.Snufflebug

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 454 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2196569
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    I don’t get why they even bother with counter-shading.

    Proper camo rather than that dark grey though – sure. But since this is Kamov, how come this didn’t catch on:

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to129000/128641.jpg

    A lot slicker.

    I’m sorry that 99% of my “contributions” to this forum are about my neverending beef with Russian paintjobs. I just don’t get it though, everything’s so excessively colorful, oddly glossy, half-arsed (paint doesn’t tend to stick for very long, for instance) and it tends to look awfully dated (straight out of WW2 in a lot of cases) in general. There are a few exceptions, but very few indeed.

    I know that plenty of you folks are digging it… So this is like, just my opinion, man. Over and out.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2197243
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    I saw somewhere that this Tu-214R had been circling the battlefield near Palmyra or something, at high altitude, with strikes following.

    They are really putting a lot of new toys into action, I suppose this beats exercises at home..

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2197727
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Back to T-50;

    https://www.facebook.com/airforceswordsofsky/?fref=nf

    I don’t have FB but if anyone in here does, and can be bothered, message them and ask for their source. I am personally calling BS on it. It is twice as fast as P-42.

    Shouldn’t they have submitted it to FAI in that case? Because that’s like… Dude.

    The P-42 record apparently still stands there:

    Type of record: Time to climb to a height of 9 000 m
    Performance: 44.18s
    Date: 1987-03-10
    Course/Location: Podmoskovnoe (USSR)
    Claimant Nikolai Sadovnikov (URS)
    Aeroplane: Sukhoi P-42 (Modified SU-27)
    Engines: 2 Lyulka AL-31F

    edit: Dang, I misunderstood it completely, pardon me. It didn’t actually climb to that altitude, but somebody says it can do it that fast. K.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2197756
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    That was a popular suggestion just few years ago… Probably ain’t worth the effort and cost.. Surely would look seriously cool, though..

    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dWkQRPzYrlQ/hqdefault.jpg

    http://i.imgur.com/8cobDlZ.png

    For that 2.5D TVC, you know.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2198110
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    I agree, the more diffuse version did actually look a lot better.

    Still, aesthetically speaking, the contrast between the two shades is way too high.

    When the first proper plane takes to the skies, I hope they’ve worked something even better out. I think that the composite nacelles and the RAM will have a massive impact on looks.

    in reply to: Stridsbåt 2010 "Ny" #2017187
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    It was cancelled 6 years ago, before the first prototype was finished.

    The development of the twin-barreled mortar “AMOS” was cancelled altogether (both the land and sea based versions) at the same time, but rumor has it that it might be revived later this year for an armored land-based platform.

    We’ve now gone into 2016 and so far there’s nothing, unfortunately.

    in reply to: twin boom designs, can they still be useful on fighters? #2160418
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    it sounds like this arrangement is ideal for recon or ground attack.

    Yah, but ground attack isn’t exactly what makes a fighter. Anyway, you guys have been talking about twin booms and forward sweep, so here’s a sweet combination of the two:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fd/AHRLAC_Take-off.jpg/640px-AHRLAC_Take-off.jpg

    Totally viable COIN aircraft, and I see no particular reason that a similar configuration couldn’t be scaled up and shaped into a subsonic, armored CAS aircraft (A-10/Su-25-style). But a competitive fighter today? I doubt it.

    If I’m not entirely mistaken, my memory could be failing me, I’ve actually seen some renders/promo material for a concept twin-boom CAS aircraft, jet-powered, coming from some Russian design bureau… 1990’s or something. But as many have already said, the chief reasons that anybody even went twin-boom in the first place have been kinda negated by developments since the 1950’s. Can’t deny the aesthetic appeal though.

    Also, for good measure, I just have to mention my all time fav twin-boomer:

    https://oldmachinepress.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/sud-ouest-so8000-narval.jpg

    Oh, that perfectly proportioned classy nose/canopy section (like some of the Hawker jets of the same era), old school bare metal finish that just sort of conveys a dirtier, more “industrial” power, an absolutely great looking wing planform with moderate sweep and a fat contra-rotating prop as the icing on the cake. Yummy.

    Ok, ok, I got carried away there. Continue, you guys.

    in reply to: "Whatif" that aircraft had those markings thread #2164156
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    ^ Saw your question in that other thread, Mr. Smoked Pork, and no – I don’t really do requests. Not a Photoshop wiz anyway, and I only bother with it if there is something nagging in my head. Something that was nagging was that MiG-23UB in Swedish Viggen-ish colours. I put it back in the Frankenplane thread but as has already been said, it’d fit better in a “what-if” context. Whaddya know, you started a thread and it’s way more relevant here so I’ll just be lazy and re-post it.

    Here goes:
    http://i.imgur.com/BaySaBi.jpg

    And, again, the original photo is here:
    http://www.airforce.ru/content/drugie-avtory/1733-mig-23ub/

    Credit where credit is due.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2164769
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Nevermind. 🙂

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2165509
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Not really a Frankenplane, more of a “what-if”, but I thought I’d put it here anyway.

    Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23UB, Swedish Air Force-ish, 1980-ish:

    http://i.imgur.com/BaySaBi.jpg

    Original:
    http://www.airforce.ru/content/drugie-avtory/1733-mig-23ub/

    Just a sudden idea that I got. Always thought that the 23UB looked cool, and for some reason I’ve wondered how it’d look in non-WP colors/markings. Some PS-ing later and there you go. There are mistakes, but at least it brought my idea to life a bit.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2167629
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]241227[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2167779
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    For me too I thought it was new, it is not very apparent especially to people not visiting regularly.

    Well, neither Moscow nor Komsomolsk looks that green in mid-October. 😉

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2168316
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Still from the realm of twitter and facebook unfortunately.

    Another image

    https://scontent-sin1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtp1/v/t1.0-9/12108841_706938856073969_1595326633397617140_n.jpg?oh=f6540fff1118a3e945e5ad1e646b5563&oe=568C9741

    That blurred photo is several weeks old and taken in Russia. Seeing that the helicopter appears to lack its rotors, it could be a sign of impending airlift (or that it was just rolled out of an Antonov there).

    That the registration is missing doesn’t necessarily mean a thing, it’s common for a multitude of reasons. What bugs me though is the bort number that seems to be sprayed-over in green. This obviously doesn’t in any way mask the helicopter’s origins and ownership (as if it being a grey Mi-28 to begin with, with a red star and ВВС РОССИИ to boot isn’t enough) but it could obfuscate just which particular machine and which unit we’re talking about. But… On the engine cowling though?! Don’t recall ever seeing that before.

    That’s odd, methinks. At any rate, if this chopper was indeed bound for Syria it’s probably already there.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2171231
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Michael Weiss says that Russian Air Force MiG-31’s are aiding ISIS in Syria:
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/08/russia-s-giving-isis-an-air-force.html

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2171682
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Yup, saw it now, my bad. 😉 From the Caspian Sea, so that’d probably narrow it down quite neatly to Kalibr/Klub missiles launched by the Buyan-M class corvettes and the one Kalibr-endowed Gepard class frigate of the Caspian Flotilla.

    Fairly interesting.

    And here’s the Russian MoDs video report on it, complete with graphics and all:

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 454 total)