dark light

Dr.Snufflebug

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 454 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian near incursions #2227116
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    I never made it to Crimea, so I can’t speak from first hand, but I would have thought that Crimea always looked like that. Most Russian, and I guess Ukrainian, provincial towns and cities are very pleasant, friendly and relaxed in the Summer time, especially on a Sunday.

    Pretty much, yeah. The difference now being that tricolors are unusually abundant, but other than that little has changed. That photo is from downtown Sevastopol this August or so.

    in reply to: Russian near incursions #2227163
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Why are there then sanctions for Russia if the people overhelmingly wanted Russia to annex them ?

    I am just asking.

    That is a very good question, considering that Crimea as a matter of fact has been looking something like this ever since the fact:
    http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6735/35461249.34/0_aa34e_3b6158ea_orig.jpg

    It’s fairly interesting to keep tabs on it by following Crimean discussion forums, photoblogs, vloggers and so on. Needless to say it sorta clashes real good with the widely held beliefs outside Crimea. This discrepancy has taken on quite bizarre proportions, to be honest.

    Another good question is why there are Crimea-specific sanctions on business, transactions and so on, that don’t apply to Russia as a whole but only affect Crimean residents. Are the Crimeans punished for being forcibly annexed, or punished for making a democractic choice? Because that’s what it boils down to, both equally absurd.

    http://i.imgur.com/YejYgGF.jpg

    in reply to: Movable tail planes #2228173
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    But will there ever be an aircraft whose tail fins can be moved from vertical to leaning, F15 to F22, in flight?

    What would that be good for?

    in reply to: Ukraine / Russia dispute aviation thread #2228240
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Yeah those Ukrainian stories of destroying the Rebel air force are obviously baloney.

    Though the rebels having an AF at all is…weird.

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1157618.html

    NovoRussian Su-25. Not sure how flight worthy it is.

    Now, I’m fairly sure that this airframe is a repainted museum object, possibly supplemented with spare parts from recent wrecks.

    The segment is clearly filmed at said Lugansk Aviation Museum, and prior to the conflict there were two former Ukrainian AF Su-25s there – blue 01 and red 20. Both were in a rather sorry state. The red 20 is present in these recent videos, in its usual “parking space” but the blue 01 is nowhere to be seen anymore. Ergo, I think blue 01 is the bird in the videos, repainted in “Novorossiya” colors…

    The L-29 was seen earlier with conflicting bort numbers on various parts/sides of the fuselage.

    in reply to: Ukraine / Russia dispute aviation thread #2228279
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Judging by the aircraft cited as having been destroyed, it’s pretty obvious that they bombed/shelled the open-air display at the Lugansk Aviation Museum. While one could say that these are “aircraft” that are in “separatist possession”, they’re all junk. Most are nothing more than empty shells overgrown with moss and lichens after decades of element exposure.

    The so-called “LNR” rebels are known to possess two aircraft that may or may not be airworthy but that at least have been observed doing low-speed taxi runs with engines running – one Sukhoi Su-25 Frogfoot (Ukrainian aircraft that did an emergency landing in rebel-held territory last summer AFAIK) and one Aero L-29 Delfin (assembled from at least two different airframes). Note that these are not on the list.

    A collection of old Antonov An-2 biplanes are present at the southern Lugansk airport too, and some of them could conceivably be made airworthy for something akin to transport/liaison duties (I am not familiar with the condition of these but the An-2 is an extremely rugged piece). I have not heard any reports about these however.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2255113
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Russia completes Mi-8AMTSh-V helicopter upgrades with domestic equipment

    The entire fleet of Mi-8AMTSh-V helicopters are now fitted with the latest Russian-made equipment, including VK-2500-03 engines produced by United Engine Corporation’s Klimov.

    Upgrades made to the helicopters include replacing the Ukrainian-made AI-9V auxiliary power units (APUs) with the Russian-made TA-14 from SPE Aerosila and an on-board satellite navigation suite which is compatible with Russia’s GLONASS and GPS. They also feature Russian weather radar systems offering a 3D image of weather formations and objects.

    http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newsrussia-completes-mi-8amtsh-v-helicopter-upgrades-domestic-equipment-4425285

    So those VK-2500 turboshafts, are they also produced domestically? Because IIRC Motor Sich in Ukraine used to build them.

    in reply to: Russian offensive in Ukraine #2226375
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Some corruption?

    Oh lordy lord. It is all pervading. In government and civil society.

    I am guessing you do not read Russian, so here something that has some decent details on the sort of things going on in Russia:
    http://www.putin-itogi.ru/putin-corruption-an-independent-white-paper/

    Try doing business in Russia, you will quickly find out just how “hardly unique” the corruption is.

    Anything with Nemtsovs name on it should be taken with a pinch of salt and preferably thoroughly scrutinized multiple times, the man’s a notorious fact twister with one hell of a grudge against the entire Russian state. His take on the Sochi endeavour was truly remarkable with enormous amounts of lies that nobody relaying his tirades bothered to dispel by simply double-checking.

    That said, corruption’s definitely there and one does not simply eradicate something that has infested the entire power structure for more than a decade (from the “spontaneous privatization” of 1988 all through the capitalist “shock therapy” of the 1990’s). If you try to stifle it head-on, you’re a goner, simple as that. What you can do is to try to bridle it over time while not upsetting too many forces too quickly. Putin hasn’t done too bad in this regard, if you consider the circumstances. But things could always be better, don’t get too far-away-eyed though. Reality has its realities.

    My business with Russia has been largely painless and things have been improving steadily over the past decade, but nepotism is still running rampant and certain authorities are truly rotten. I don’t know what’s worse though, the prevalence of purely financial corruption or the frickin pi**y mentalities everywhere (where it matters). Ironically enough the “opposition” to this “system” is just as bad, if not worse, since it’s just the way things are.

    At any rate, this all stands in stark contrast to the regular folks I know and love, so I guess the system and its bureaucracy really screws people up. I do seem to sense a generational shift pertaining to this though, slowly but surely.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2226462
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    western datalink is 8 times faster

    http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/elec-tricks-turning-aesa-radars-into-broadband-comlinks-01629/

    http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/military/AESAs-Advantages_25395.html#.U__3v8VdWbM

    It sounds to me like they are mixing things up real bad here. Amateur mistake.

    They then demonstrated the transfer of a 72 MB synthetic aperture radar image in 3.5 seconds at a data rate of 274 Mbps

    72 MB in 3.5 seconds is technically slower than 274 Mbps but they are then talking about burst rates and what not and I am not too well versed in these types of transfers, I am just familiar with the general units.

    During the mission, the team transmitted and received in full duplex at 274-megabits per second burst rate.

    Raytheon has demonstrated the system can transmit data at rates of 274 megabytes a second — “a speed that starts to approach instantaneous –

    My emphasis in bold. They are mixing units up, one byte is 8 bits, 1 MB/s = 8 mbps.

    Obviously 72 MB in 3.5 seconds can’t be >72MB/s, this simply does not compute. In megabytes, the Raytheon numbers would be ~20 MB/s based on the transfer example (and an implied maximum of 34.25MB/s based on the mpbs figure, but that’s secondary as we have no direct quote of this).

    So, if the quoted Russian numbers are correct (ie 34 MB/s), they are faster than Raytheon based on the example given by the latter (72MB in 3.5 seconds). But if one considers the Raytheon 274mbps number (again, it doesn’t directly reflect the actual transfer example given, but let’s assume that it’s the important number to look at anyway) then they are just a tad faster (the Russians would clock in at an ever so slightly slower 272mbps based on their example). Then again, if the same difference between optimal speed (burst speed?) and actual volume transferred over a given time were to be observed, then the Russians would potentially be faster again, I guess. It’s a tad confusing, so this is why people should stick to coherent practices.

    But – and this is the one major caveat – if the Russians were also talking about megabits from the get go and ALSO messed up the units, then it’s the other way around and they are indeed much slower.

    in reply to: Russian offensive in Ukraine #2227025
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    Putin: making being a Russian politician cool since midnight 1999

    What’s gone down recently is really mostly a “rally ’round the flag”-effect. Good comparisons would be Thatcher and the Tories right around the Falkland crisis, or indeed the POTUS (for whose popularity ratings the term was originally coined) every time the US gets involved in something that spurs patriotism.

    Case in point (G.W. Bush approval ratings):
    http://i.imgur.com/3lKv8cnl.jpg

    Then you have three other main factors pertaining to V.V. Putins general popularity – namely the abysmal job his predecessor did, the very tangible improvement of peoples lives in Russia under Putin and the lack of any credible alternatives. In other words, it’s no wonder he’s heaps popular and there’s no need to ascribe it to propaganda or personality cults or anything like that.

    in reply to: Russian offensive in Ukraine #2227361
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    I guess Russia didn’t get enough trouble with Chechnya. Ukraine would be Chechnya many times over if they decide to fully invade that country. Meanwhile likenesses like this are appearing all over Moscow as Putin builds on his cult of personality.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231463[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231464[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231465[/ATTACH]

    Donbass is more of a Chechnya to Ukraine than what Ukraine is to Russia – just saying. Essentially a local separatist insurrection supported by foreign powers, that sprung into life during a highly unstable period of the parent country, with the parent country trying to stop it with crude and destructive methods. That’s pretty much a carbon copy of Chechnya #1.

    Chechnya #2 was a tad different, since they had by then morphed into mad islamists (not Chechen separatists anymore, but islamic caliphate people supported by the Gulf countries) with an affinity for terrorism against civilians, and on top of it all they actually attempted to invade the rest of Russia, like an actual military invasion.

    And I’m sure Putin personally instructed everyone to make t-shirts and what have you. I guess the reason for him visiting Mongolia the other day was to market this particular line, too:
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BwsNshBIQAAsrud.jpg

    Nah, overly popular politicians are always a bit eerie since politicians are just general swine and typically it comes across as a tad uncanny when people like them “too” much. But this is in no way unique and does not constitute a personality cult, not until he unveils a monument to himself or his name starts popping up in school curriculums. I know loads and loads of Russians and they tend to think he’s a pretty good president (and crucially, unfathomably much better than the drunkard Eltsin, which you must put into perspective), but they have no issues acknowledging his many faults and failed policies.

    When I asked them if they’d wear one of those silly t-shirt some said “hell yeah, if only to **** off the rest of the world”, since they know it’s such a flippin eyesore to some. There you go. :p

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2288772
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    And there are surely several other items wich are solely build manufactured in Ukrainian factories…. which I’m not sure are so eager to sell to Russia.

    What makes you think that? A whole lot of these Ukrainian manufacturers are entirely dependent on Russian sales for their very survival, since they’ve taken up such a niche post-USSR and Russia has refrained from seeking these components elsewhere, instead relying on the same producers as always. The companies/factories themselves thus have no issues about selling to Russia.

    The (current) Ukrainian government on the other hand doesn’t fancy the idea and it appears they’d rather let these companies die outright than letting them continue their businesses with Russia. A recent example of this is the Antonov “restructuring” ordered by the Ukrainian government, which saw their CEO fired on direct Kiev orders, and then the rest of the company was simply told off for not being competitive in the EU (which itself would appear a rather naive prospect anyway). Bummer, eh?

    In short, don’t mix up business and politics when it comes to things such as “eagerness”, because it doesn’t work that way.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2293572
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    RF code =/= serial

    True, and the machine lacking an RF code is yellow 47.

    From same event (Torzhok helicopter base, Tver Oblast, June 29th) with loads of choppers including the codeless yellow 47 to the far right:
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to141000/140005.jpg

    In other words there’s nothing fake or PSed about the photo TR1 posted.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2213964
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    I just spent my lunch on this serving suggestion:

    http://i.imgur.com/Ob6yhRM.jpg

    Seriously, just do it. 😎

    in reply to: Russian Aircraft #2222556
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    According to the BBC this morning, RAF Typhoons from RAF Leuchars were scrambled to intercept what turned out to be Russian military aircraft approaching but not penetrating UK airspace. Evidently, these aircraft could not be identified using conventional means.

    Just a small request – if any of these aircraft turn out to be TU-95 Bear bombers, which I believe are still operational, please let them fly down here over London and Kent. I couldn’t think of anything more fascinating: swept-wings/noisy turboprops (Kuznetsov?) and contra-rotating props.

    What an incredible spectacle.

    These long-range Tu-95/142 flights resumed in 2007 after being on a long hiatus since the 1990’s due to lack of funding and support. Every now and then Tu-160 does it too. 🙂

    As far as Europe goes they tend to start off at Engels and then fly north, round Nordkap (Norway) and from that point and on constantly escorted by NATO response units, all the way down to the North Sea and back. It’s a bit of a tradition and it occurs at least five times a year, probably more often than that.

    Good exercise for both the Bear crews and the NATO guys, so it’s mutually beneficial and quite difficult to consider it hostile in any way. I mean, the same applies for ships. Foreign ships that get close enough are always buzzed by aviation and escorted by patrol vessels, regardless of what countries we are talking about.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2223800
    Dr.Snufflebug
    Participant

    The Ukrainian government just stepped in and fired Antonovs chief designer and CEO Dmitry Kiva. Reasons unknown, too friendly with Russia by the sounds of it.

    This will have huge consequences I think, both for Russia and Ukraine itself.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 454 total)