dark light

Discendo Duces

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 238 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Q: Gate guardian at RAF South Cerney, 1959 #976265
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    I was at South Cerney for a week’s Summer Camp with the ATC in 1964.

    No gateguard, but there was a derelict but otherwise unburnt Meteor T.7 in the long grass by the fence on the far side. It was in natural metal with no roundels or serial number, not a speck of paintwork anywhere, in fact.

    The only items of aviation interest were Chipmunks from Cambridge UAS and our AEF on summer camp, plus the daily Piston Provosts doing touch & goes from Little Riss; but a day’s visit to the USAF at Brize Norton more than made up for that .:)

    DD

    in reply to: Journey's End at Hendon ….. #981826
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    I wasn’t aware of that. Did Kermit Weeks trade something for his Albatros? Engine(s) possibly?

    DD

    in reply to: Journey's End at Hendon ….. #982906
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Rlangham;1970085]There’s already at least one other RE8 flying in New Zealand, and at least one Albatros, so there’s plenty of opportunity to see them[/QUOTE

    Yes, I knew that.

    I should have said that TVAL have the means to build one more of each for a UK buyer , should anyone have the ready cash..

    DD

    in reply to: Journey's End at Hendon ….. #983344
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Words cannot express how disgusted I am that those two aircraft are just being left sitting in that museum. In fact, i’m almost ready to say I will not visit the place again.

    If it wasn’t for the RAF Museum they wouldn’t be in this country. They commisioned them.

    I’m sure TVAL can build two more flyers if anyone wants to put up the money.

    DD

    in reply to: Journey's End at Hendon ….. #983472
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Great pictures of a marvellous museum, thanks for posting.

    DD

    in reply to: Scrapping WW2 aircraft in North Africa.. #989034
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Spitfire Alert

    Funnily enough…

    If I’m not mistaken, there’s a Spitfire fuselage loaded onto a railway waggon of scrap at about 6:15.

    DD

    in reply to: Another Mosquito under rebuild to fly in NZ #1002915
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Dave

    Precisely.

    Abuse of hospitality will only end up with the banning of cameras and possibly visitors as well. There are plenty of workshops where that policy is in place already.

    DD

    in reply to: Hurricane Data Plate #1002919
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Foray and Rocketeer

    Thanks.

    Foray please check your pms

    DD

    in reply to: IWM Spitfire Dismantled – Pics #1003616
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Presumably at Lambeth, date unknown, credit Colin Lourie. What’s the cockpit in the right foreground?

    http://www.clourie.co.uk/aircraft/page58/files/page58-1248-full.html

    Several more from Lambeth in that excellent set.

    DD

    in reply to: Hurricane Data Plate #1004755
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    DD
    Your wondering is correct in as much as each sub component had its own id plate and number, which makes it even more odd why there should be two major plates (giving final ‘whole’ aircraft details) on the fuselage sub component. One would do.

    I’m no expert on Hurricane construction, but are you sure that the locations of the two plates are on the same sub component? The one in the cockpit is self-evident, but where was the other – on the rear fuselage upper decking ?

    If they were on different sub components, with different 41H-xxxx numbers, then the airframe serial number may have been stamped onto the ‘secondary’ plate at a later date , when the components were joined together.

    Pure speculation, of course…

    DD

    in reply to: Hurricane Data Plate #1005186
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Andy

    OK, thanks.

    DD

    in reply to: Hurricane Data Plate #1005210
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Foray

    I agree. I just wondered if ,where there were two plates, they referred to different parts of the airframe; for instance, rear fuselage and centre/cockpit section. In that case I would expect the Hawker part numbers to be different.

    DD

    in reply to: Hurricane Data Plate #1006121
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    I believe that it wasn’t an either/or, but that this would have been fitted along with the main plate on the port side of the cockpit near the fuel tap.

    I know of several recovered wrecks where both have been found.[/QUOTE]

    Where two plates have been found on one airframe, could you say whether the 41H-xxxxx Hawker Part No. was the same on both plates? Just curious.

    DD

    in reply to: IWM Spitfire Dismantled – Pics #1010494
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    Perhaps he thinks he’s broken it?:):):)

    Regarding other comments if the aircraft has a WWII applied paint scheme, then leave well alone and carryout conservation work only. Far to many organizations who should know better still insist on having every airframe looking better than factory fresh!

    Eric

    I agree.

    I was at Lambeth on Tuesday just before the Spitfire came down. The stencilled detailing and patina it wore was in stark contrast to the immaculate Mustang, which to my mind looked like a giant Airfix kit in comparison. (No criticism intended, the P-51 as received by IWM needed a paint job).

    DD

    in reply to: Wagga Wagga wrecks update #940311
    Discendo Duces
    Participant

    There’s another 30 seconds that I won’t get back…

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 238 total)