I was at South Cerney for a week’s Summer Camp with the ATC in 1964.
No gateguard, but there was a derelict but otherwise unburnt Meteor T.7 in the long grass by the fence on the far side. It was in natural metal with no roundels or serial number, not a speck of paintwork anywhere, in fact.
The only items of aviation interest were Chipmunks from Cambridge UAS and our AEF on summer camp, plus the daily Piston Provosts doing touch & goes from Little Riss; but a day’s visit to the USAF at Brize Norton more than made up for that .:)
DD
I wasn’t aware of that. Did Kermit Weeks trade something for his Albatros? Engine(s) possibly?
DD
[QUOTE=Rlangham;1970085]There’s already at least one other RE8 flying in New Zealand, and at least one Albatros, so there’s plenty of opportunity to see them[/QUOTE
Yes, I knew that.
I should have said that TVAL have the means to build one more of each for a UK buyer , should anyone have the ready cash..
DD
Words cannot express how disgusted I am that those two aircraft are just being left sitting in that museum. In fact, i’m almost ready to say I will not visit the place again.
If it wasn’t for the RAF Museum they wouldn’t be in this country. They commisioned them.
I’m sure TVAL can build two more flyers if anyone wants to put up the money.
DD
Great pictures of a marvellous museum, thanks for posting.
DD
Spitfire Alert
Funnily enough…
If I’m not mistaken, there’s a Spitfire fuselage loaded onto a railway waggon of scrap at about 6:15.
DD
Dave
Precisely.
Abuse of hospitality will only end up with the banning of cameras and possibly visitors as well. There are plenty of workshops where that policy is in place already.
DD
Foray and Rocketeer
Thanks.
Foray please check your pms
DD
Presumably at Lambeth, date unknown, credit Colin Lourie. What’s the cockpit in the right foreground?
http://www.clourie.co.uk/aircraft/page58/files/page58-1248-full.html
Several more from Lambeth in that excellent set.
DD
DD
Your wondering is correct in as much as each sub component had its own id plate and number, which makes it even more odd why there should be two major plates (giving final ‘whole’ aircraft details) on the fuselage sub component. One would do.
I’m no expert on Hurricane construction, but are you sure that the locations of the two plates are on the same sub component? The one in the cockpit is self-evident, but where was the other – on the rear fuselage upper decking ?
If they were on different sub components, with different 41H-xxxx numbers, then the airframe serial number may have been stamped onto the ‘secondary’ plate at a later date , when the components were joined together.
Pure speculation, of course…
DD
Andy
OK, thanks.
DD
Foray
I agree. I just wondered if ,where there were two plates, they referred to different parts of the airframe; for instance, rear fuselage and centre/cockpit section. In that case I would expect the Hawker part numbers to be different.
DD
I believe that it wasn’t an either/or, but that this would have been fitted along with the main plate on the port side of the cockpit near the fuel tap.
I know of several recovered wrecks where both have been found.[/QUOTE]
Where two plates have been found on one airframe, could you say whether the 41H-xxxxx Hawker Part No. was the same on both plates? Just curious.
DD
Perhaps he thinks he’s broken it?:):):)
Regarding other comments if the aircraft has a WWII applied paint scheme, then leave well alone and carryout conservation work only. Far to many organizations who should know better still insist on having every airframe looking better than factory fresh!
Eric
I agree.
I was at Lambeth on Tuesday just before the Spitfire came down. The stencilled detailing and patina it wore was in stark contrast to the immaculate Mustang, which to my mind looked like a giant Airfix kit in comparison. (No criticism intended, the P-51 as received by IWM needed a paint job).
DD
There’s another 30 seconds that I won’t get back…