Ryan, you missed my point I think ( perhaps you are not wealthy enough?)
If you cannot get something as simple as the gender of the most prominent policewoman in the country correct, why should we trust anything else you comment on?
John.
Since I think some of your last paragraph may possibly be aimed in my direction amongst others, I categorically repudiate your position which has no basis in fact.
It is merely you trying to justify your own hate of people who think differently to you. In that respect you are no better than those you accuse of appeasment.
I challenge you to find and reference on this forum a single article or letter in the Guardian or Independent,or even the Mail or Telegraph for that matter, that seeks to justify as acceptable any of the terrorist atrocities that have taken place in the UK, or France, or the USA or anywhere for that matter.
If you can’t, or won’t, that speaks volumes in itself
And for the record, I condemn without any qualification any terrorist act whosoever commits it. I make no apologies for my western values.
You haven’t actually proven anything Ryan, only put your perspective with loads of poorly referenced data . Important Difference.
And if you can’t even get the gender of the Met police commissioner right……..
I think most of the suurounding land is owned by the College. Not that that would stop the person who planted the crop having kittens
I Have had four nephews graduate in the past year. Three of them had graduate level well paid jobs lined up before they had sat their finals, the other has five or six interviews in the next month. Just saying. And all educated at comprehensive schools and graduating from Russell league universities.
She had just had an engine overhaul with three new cylinders. The first flight following the work was this morning I understand. Fantastic to see the pilot and aircraft in one piece. It was Paul Stone flying her earlier in the day I think
Re#420
I have no reason to believe anything that you write without the evidence to support it Some of it may well be accurate, however in all of the areas that we have had mutual experiences as you have explained them, I have found your position to be at best unusual.
In short, on this issue, no you have no credibility
Edit: but as I am sure you value my opinion as little as I value yours, feel free to ignore
Come on John, tell all, without details how can we accept that your ‘intelligence’ experience is of any value to the debate?
Altho’ it was a long time ago, apart perhaps from Tony T, I think I am the only one on this forum who has had practical experience of intelligence gathering against a determined enemy possessing little scruple
Please let us know how long ago and in what context?
My guess is that your experience so long ago has little direct relevance to today’s scenarios. indeed it may lead you to false conclusions
John, just because you find someone writing in the Torygraph letters pages who has a similar distrust of the commission for racial equality does not in itself mean that she, nor indeed you, are right.
You still haven’t explained where all these people you want to lock up will be housed, nor how it would be paid for.
And the german car industry argument not allowing a tough negotiating stance by Merkel et al has been debunked, even in the Torygraph, as a red herring
Yes, one can just imagine Mr. Laraman saying “and she was in the Film Battle of britain” and the reporter “forgetting” to write the notes up correctly
Hmmmmm…..
Was the Battle of Britain fought after 1942 then?
She was in the 1968 Film, do you think that counts?
That epic belongs to the fourth form debating society.
Ah,but you see I was trying to set it at your level since you don’t seem to understand the basics.
There are still people who believe the earth is flat. Not many, but a few.
A few centuries ago almost everybody believed the world was flat.
Denying climate change due to industrialisation and the burning of fossil fuels is on a par with still believing the earth is flat.
Just because you chose to believe that it is not so doesn’t alter the above. The only fraudulent science is served up by the deniers.
Oh, and yet again you are behind the times John, you will find that china is taking this very seriously now and indeed is taking the lead left by the USA courtesy of forrest trump.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-climatechange-idUKKBN1360DK